Herman Aleksandra M, Stanton Tasha R
Laboratory of Brain Imaging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health & Human Performance, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
J Pain. 2022 Mar;23(3):487-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
Pain interventions typically include effortful exercise and long-term treatment - ie, short-term costs (effort) with delayed benefit (improved pain and/or function). Thus, understanding if long-term pain influences decision-making in context of delays and effort is essential given clear relevance to treatment uptake and/or adherence. We evaluated delay and effort attitudes in those experiencing chronic pain (n = 391) and in pain-free controls (n = 263). Additionally, we investigated the role of bodily sensation awareness and/or interpretation as potential contributing factors to altered decision-making. Volunteers completed three discounting questionnaires, assessing the influence of temporal delays (gains, losses) and effort on devaluation of monetary outcomes. Individuals with chronic pain had more short-sighted decisions for monetary gains, but not losses, and decreased willingness to undertake effort for monetary gains than the No Pain group. The Pain group had higher bodily sensation awareness and while this related to higher impulsivity, delay and effort discounting, neither awareness nor interpretation of bodily sensations interacted with pain levels or explained group differences in discounting behavior. These findings suggest that impaired delay and effort-based discounting is present in people with chronic pain, and that this may be driven by pain-induced changes, but not pain-induced enhancements in bodily sensation awareness and/or interpretation. Exploring the utility of interventions targeting discounting behavior is warranted. Data availability: Study materials are available here: https://osf.io/zexm7/?view_only=c9848597361c41808c612874da6f33b7. PERSPECTIVE: People with chronic pain make more short-sighted decisions (prefer less reward sooner) and decreased willingness to undertake effort (prefer less reward with little effort) for monetary gains than people without pain. Interventions targeting discounting behavior may help improve both uptake and adherence for evidence-based, effortful treatments, such as exercise.
疼痛干预通常包括费力的运动和长期治疗,即短期成本(努力)与延迟收益(疼痛减轻和/或功能改善)。因此,鉴于与治疗接受度和/或依从性的明确相关性,了解长期疼痛是否会在延迟和努力的背景下影响决策至关重要。我们评估了慢性疼痛患者(n = 391)和无疼痛对照组(n = 263)对延迟和努力的态度。此外,我们调查了身体感觉意识和/或解释作为决策改变的潜在促成因素的作用。志愿者完成了三份折扣问卷,评估时间延迟(收益、损失)和努力对货币结果贬值的影响。与无疼痛组相比,慢性疼痛患者在货币收益方面的决策更短视,但在货币损失方面并非如此,并且为货币收益付出努力的意愿降低。疼痛组的身体感觉意识更高,虽然这与更高的冲动性、延迟和努力折扣有关,但身体感觉的意识和解释均未与疼痛程度相互作用,也未解释折扣行为的组间差异。这些发现表明,慢性疼痛患者存在基于延迟和努力的折扣受损,这可能是由疼痛引起的变化驱动的,但不是由疼痛引起的身体感觉意识和/或解释的增强驱动的。探索针对折扣行为的干预措施的效用是有必要的。数据可用性:研究材料可在此处获取:https://osf.io/zexm7/?view_only=c9848597361c41808c612874da6f33b7。观点:与无疼痛的人相比,慢性疼痛患者在货币收益方面做出的决策更短视(更喜欢更快获得更少的奖励),并且为货币收益付出努力的意愿降低(更喜欢付出很少努力获得更少的奖励)。针对折扣行为的干预措施可能有助于提高基于证据的、费力的治疗(如运动)的接受度和依从性。