Suppr超能文献

宠物爬行动物——我们满足它们的需求了吗?

Pet Reptiles-Are We Meeting Their Needs?

作者信息

Azevedo Alexandre, Guimarães Leonor, Ferraz Joel, Whiting Martin, Magalhães-Sant'Ana Manuel

机构信息

CIISA-Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal.

Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Rua Jorge de Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;11(10):2964. doi: 10.3390/ani11102964.

Abstract

The ability to meet the needs of each species in captivity is at the heart of the ethical debate on the acceptability of keeping reptiles and other animals as pets. Little is known about the ability of reptile owners to understand their pets' behavior and to meet their welfare requirements. In this study, we surveyed pet reptile owners in Portugal (N = 220) to assess their behavioral knowledge and the provision of essential husbandry needs. Although two-thirds of respondents (68%) scored very good to excellent in terms of knowledge of their pet reptile's behaviors, only 15% of respondents met four essential reptile husbandry needs (temperature, lighting, diet and refuge) and 43% met two or less. None of the respondents reported their reptile's welfare as very poor, and only a single respondent reported it as poor. Logistic regression model showed that while snake owners had fourteen times higher odds of reporting adequate husbandry provision, lizard owners had the highest odds of reporting good or very good welfare despite providing less of their animals' basic husbandry needs. These results suggest that many pet reptiles in Portugal live in, at best, 'controlled deprivation' and are at risk of suffering poor welfare throughout their captive lives. Moreover, behaviors indicative of poor welfare and captivity stress were considered '' by up to one quarter of respondents. We suggest that the frequency of these behaviors in pet reptiles has led to their acceptance as normal, precluding the search for ways to prevent them. These results suggest that campaigns aimed at challenging the current norm for adequate reptile welfare are warranted.

摘要

满足圈养中每个物种需求的能力是关于将爬行动物和其他动物作为宠物饲养的可接受性的伦理辩论的核心。关于爬行动物主人理解其宠物行为并满足其福利需求的能力,我们所知甚少。在这项研究中,我们对葡萄牙的宠物爬行动物主人(N = 220)进行了调查,以评估他们的行为知识以及基本饲养需求的提供情况。尽管三分之二的受访者(68%)在宠物爬行动物行为知识方面得分非常好至优秀,但只有15%的受访者满足了四项基本的爬行动物饲养需求(温度、光照、饮食和避难所),43%的受访者满足了两项或更少。没有受访者报告其爬行动物的福利非常差,只有一位受访者报告其福利差。逻辑回归模型显示,虽然蛇主人报告提供充足饲养条件的几率高出十四倍,但蜥蜴主人报告良好或非常好福利的几率最高,尽管他们为动物提供的基本饲养需求较少。这些结果表明,葡萄牙许多宠物爬行动物充其量生活在“控制性匮乏”中,并且在其圈养生活中面临福利不佳的风险。此外,高达四分之一的受访者认为表明福利不佳和圈养压力的行为是“正常的”。我们认为,这些行为在宠物爬行动物中的频繁出现导致它们被视为正常,从而排除了寻找预防方法的可能性。这些结果表明,开展旨在挑战当前适当爬行动物福利标准的运动是有必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d37/8533019/97f077253573/animals-11-02964-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验