Suppr超能文献

全身麻醉下幕上肿瘤切除术中经颅与直接皮层刺激诱发运动诱发电位的比较(TRANSEKT试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Transcranial versus Direct Cortical Stimulation for Motor-Evoked Potentials during Resection of Supratentorial Tumors under General Anesthesia (The TRANSEKT-Trial): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Abboud Tammam, Asendorf Thomas, Heinrich Jutta, Faust Katharina, Krieg Sandro M, Seidel Kathleen, Mielke Dorothee, Matthies Cordola, Ringel Florian, Rohde Veit, Szelényi Andrea

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2021 Oct 16;9(10):1490. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9101490.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of motor function during surgery for supratentorial tumors under general anesthesia applies either transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) or direct cortical stimulation (DCS) to elicit motor-evoked potentials. To date, there is no guideline that favor one method over the other. Therefore, we designed this randomized study to compare between both methods regarding the prediction of postoperative motor deficits and extent of tumor resection.

METHODS

This is a multicenter (six centers in Germany and one in Switzerland), double blind, parallel group, exploratory, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients without or with mild paresis, who are scheduled for surgical resection of motor-eloquent brain tumors under general anesthesia will be randomized to surgical resection under TES or surgical resection under DCS. The primary endpoint is sensitivity and specificity in prognosis of motor function 7 days after surgery. The main secondary endpoint is the extent of tumor resection. The study is planned to include 120 patients within 2 years.

DISCUSSION

The present exploratory study should compare TES and DCS regarding sensitivity and specificity in predicting postoperative motor deficit and extent of tumor resection to calculate the required number of patients in a confirmatory trial to test the superiority of one method over the other.

摘要

背景

在全身麻醉下进行幕上肿瘤手术时,对运动功能的监测可采用经颅电刺激(TES)或直接皮质刺激(DCS)来诱发运动诱发电位。迄今为止,尚无指南表明哪种方法更具优势。因此,我们设计了这项随机研究,以比较这两种方法在预测术后运动功能障碍和肿瘤切除范围方面的差异。

方法

这是一项多中心(德国六个中心和瑞士一个中心)、双盲、平行组、探索性、随机对照临床试验。计划在全身麻醉下接受运动功能区脑肿瘤手术切除的无轻瘫或有轻度轻瘫的患者,将被随机分为接受TES手术切除或DCS手术切除。主要终点是术后7天运动功能预后的敏感性和特异性。主要次要终点是肿瘤切除范围。该研究计划在2年内纳入120例患者。

讨论

本探索性研究应比较TES和DCS在预测术后运动功能障碍和肿瘤切除范围方面的敏感性和特异性,以计算在验证性试验中测试一种方法优于另一种方法所需的患者数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67a4/8533079/94a27f162034/biomedicines-09-01490-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验