• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用紫外可见光谱和化学计量学定量检测湿加工和干法加工的圆豆研磨咖啡中的玉米掺杂物。

Quantification of Corn Adulteration in Wet and Dry-Processed Peaberry Ground Roasted Coffees by UV-Vis Spectroscopy and Chemometrics.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Technology, Lampung State Polytechnic, Jl. Soekarno Hatta No. 10, Rajabasa, Bandar Lampung 35141, Indonesia.

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Lampung, Jl. Soemantri Brojonegoro No.1, Bandar Lampung 35145, Indonesia.

出版信息

Molecules. 2021 Oct 9;26(20):6091. doi: 10.3390/molecules26206091.

DOI:10.3390/molecules26206091
PMID:34684672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8539780/
Abstract

In this present research, a spectroscopic method based on UV-Vis spectroscopy is utilized to quantify the level of corn adulteration in peaberry ground roasted coffee by chemometrics. Peaberry coffee with two types of bean processing of wet and dry-processed methods was used and intentionally adulterated by corn with a 10-50% level of adulteration. UV-Vis spectral data are obtained for aqueous samples in the range between 250 and 400 nm with a 1 nm interval. Three multivariate regression methods, including partial least squares regression (PLSR), multiple linear regression (MLR), and principal component regression (PCR), are used to predict the level of corn adulteration. The result shows that all individual regression models using individual wet and dry samples are better than that of global regression models using combined wet and dry samples. The best calibration model for individual wet and dry and combined samples is obtained for the PLSR model with a coefficient of determination in the range of 0.83-0.93 and RMSE below 6% (/) for calibration and validation. However, the error prediction in terms of RMSEP and bias were highly increased when the individual regression model was used to predict the level of corn adulteration with differences in the bean processing method. The obtained results demonstrate that the use of the global PLSR model is better in predicting the level of corn adulteration. The error prediction for this global model is acceptable with low RMSEP and bias for both individual and combined prediction samples. The obtained RPD and RER in prediction for the global PLSR model are more than two and five for individual and combined samples, respectively. The proposed method using UV-Vis spectroscopy with a global PLSR model can be applied to quantify the level of corn adulteration in peaberry ground roasted coffee with different bean processing methods.

摘要

在本研究中,利用基于紫外可见分光光度法的光谱方法,通过化学计量学定量测定了平豆研磨烘焙咖啡中的玉米掺杂物含量。使用了两种豆加工类型的平豆咖啡,即湿法和干法加工,并故意用 10-50%掺杂物水平的玉米进行掺假。在 250 到 400nm 之间,间隔为 1nm,获得水相样品的紫外可见光谱数据。使用三种多元回归方法,包括偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)、多元线性回归(MLR)和主成分回归(PCR),来预测玉米掺杂物的含量。结果表明,使用单个湿样和干样的所有个体回归模型均优于使用湿样和干样组合的全局回归模型。对于个体湿样和干样以及组合样品,PLSR 模型获得了最佳的校准模型,其决定系数范围为 0.83-0.93,校准和验证的 RMSE 低于 6% (/ )。然而,当个体回归模型用于预测具有豆加工方法差异的玉米掺杂物含量时,误差预测在 RMSEP 和偏差方面显著增加。研究结果表明,使用全局 PLSR 模型预测玉米掺杂物含量更好。对于该全局模型,个体和组合预测样品的 RMSEP 和偏差的误差预测是可以接受的。对于全局 PLSR 模型,在预测中获得的 RPD 和 RER 分别大于 2 和 5。使用紫外可见光谱和全局 PLSR 模型的方法可以应用于定量测定不同豆加工方法的平豆研磨烘焙咖啡中的玉米掺杂物含量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/7456a6afad78/molecules-26-06091-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/e4f470c96bef/molecules-26-06091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/663da3e14cfb/molecules-26-06091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/d6ea8fe1bd0a/molecules-26-06091-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/3e515b571080/molecules-26-06091-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/7456a6afad78/molecules-26-06091-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/e4f470c96bef/molecules-26-06091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/663da3e14cfb/molecules-26-06091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/d6ea8fe1bd0a/molecules-26-06091-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/3e515b571080/molecules-26-06091-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d8/8539780/7456a6afad78/molecules-26-06091-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantification of Corn Adulteration in Wet and Dry-Processed Peaberry Ground Roasted Coffees by UV-Vis Spectroscopy and Chemometrics.利用紫外可见光谱和化学计量学定量检测湿加工和干法加工的圆豆研磨咖啡中的玉米掺杂物。
Molecules. 2021 Oct 9;26(20):6091. doi: 10.3390/molecules26206091.
2
Quantitative evaluation of multiple adulterants in roasted coffee by Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and chemometrics.采用漫反射红外傅里叶变换光谱(DRIFTS)和化学计量学定量评估烘焙咖啡中的多种掺杂物。
Talanta. 2013 Oct 15;115:563-8. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Coffee arabica adulteration: Detection of wheat, corn and chickpea.阿拉比卡咖啡掺伪的检测:小麦、玉米和鹰嘴豆。
Food Chem. 2018 Oct 30;264:142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.037. Epub 2018 May 5.
4
Detection of the Adulteration of Dendrobium Huoshanense with Dendrobium Henanense by UV-Vis-Shortwave Near-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometrics.紫外-可见-短波近红外漫反射光谱结合化学计量学检测霍山石斛中河南石斛的掺假情况
J AOAC Int. 2024 Jan 4;107(1):158-163. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsad090.
5
Detection of Corn Adulteration in Brazilian Coffee (Coffea arabica) by Tocopherol Profiling and Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy.通过生育酚谱分析和近红外(NIR)光谱法检测巴西咖啡(阿拉比卡咖啡)中的玉米掺假情况。
J Agric Food Chem. 2015 Dec 16;63(49):10662-8. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04777. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
6
Authentication of the Origin, Variety and Roasting Degree of Coffee Samples by Non-Targeted HPLC-UV Fingerprinting and Chemometrics. Application to the Detection and Quantitation of Adulterated Coffee Samples.采用非靶向高效液相色谱-紫外指纹图谱和化学计量学方法对咖啡样品的产地、品种和烘焙程度进行鉴定。应用于掺假咖啡样品的检测和定量分析。
Foods. 2020 Mar 24;9(3):378. doi: 10.3390/foods9030378.
7
Rapid detection of green-pea adulteration in pistachio nuts using Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics.利用拉曼光谱和化学计量学快速检测开心果中的青豆掺杂物。
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Mar 15;101(4):1699-1708. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10845. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
8
Rapid detection of adulteration of minced beef using Vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy with multivariate methods.利用可见/近红外反射光谱结合多元方法快速检测牛肉糜掺假。
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2020 Apr 5;230:118005. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.118005. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
9
Improvement of near infrared spectroscopic (NIRS) analysis of caffeine in roasted Arabica coffee by variable selection method of stability competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (SCARS).通过稳定性竞争自适应重加权采样(SCARS)变量选择方法提高烘焙阿拉比卡咖啡中咖啡因的近红外光谱(NIRS)分析。
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2013 Oct;114:350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.05.053. Epub 2013 May 29.
10
Rapid quantification of the adulteration of pomegranate juices by Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics.拉曼光谱和化学计量学快速定量分析石榴汁的掺假。
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2023 Dec 5;302:123014. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.123014. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Targeted Detection and Quantification of Food Adulteration of High-Quality Stingless Bee Honey (SBH) via a Portable LED-Based Fluorescence Spectroscopy.通过基于便携式发光二极管的荧光光谱法对优质无刺蜂蜂蜜(SBH)掺假进行非靶向检测和定量分析
Foods. 2023 Aug 15;12(16):3067. doi: 10.3390/foods12163067.
2
Discrimination of Adulterated Ginkgo Biloba Products Based on 2T2D Correlation Spectroscopy in UV-Vis Range.基于 UV-Vis 范围 2T2D 相关光谱法鉴别掺假银杏叶产品。
Molecules. 2022 Jan 10;27(2):433. doi: 10.3390/molecules27020433.

本文引用的文献

1
Three centuries on the science of coffee authenticity control.三个世纪以来的咖啡真实性控制科学。
Food Res Int. 2021 Nov;149:110690. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110690. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
2
Digested Civet Coffee Beans (Kopi Luwak)-An Unfortunate Trend in Specialty Coffee Caused by Mislabeling of ?经过消化的麝香猫咖啡豆(猫屎咖啡)——特种咖啡中因误标导致的不良趋势?
Foods. 2021 Jun 9;10(6):1329. doi: 10.3390/foods10061329.
3
Use of non-volatile compounds for the classification of specialty and traditional Brazilian coffees using principal component analysis.
使用非挥发性化合物进行主成分分析,对特种咖啡和传统巴西咖啡进行分类。
Food Chem. 2021 Oct 30;360:130088. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130088. Epub 2021 May 13.
4
Authenticity Assessment and Fraud Quantitation of Coffee Adulterated with Chicory, Barley, and Flours by Untargeted HPLC-UV-FLD Fingerprinting and Chemometrics.采用非靶向高效液相色谱-紫外-荧光指纹图谱和化学计量学方法对掺有菊苣、大麦和面粉的咖啡进行真伪评估和掺假定量分析
Foods. 2021 Apr 12;10(4):840. doi: 10.3390/foods10040840.
5
Evaluation of chemical properties of intact green coffee beans using near-infrared spectroscopy.应用近红外光谱法评价完整绿咖啡豆的化学性质。
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Jun;101(8):3500-3507. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10981. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
6
Comparison of Batch and Continuous Wet-Processing of Coffee: Changes in the Main Compounds in Beans, By-Products and Wastewater.咖啡分批与连续湿法加工的比较:咖啡豆、副产品及废水中主要化合物的变化
Foods. 2020 Aug 18;9(8):1135. doi: 10.3390/foods9081135.
7
Rapid detection and quantification of sucrose adulteration in cow milk using Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy coupled with multivariate analysis.使用衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外光谱结合多变量分析快速检测和定量牛奶中的蔗糖掺假。
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2020 Oct 15;240:118628. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.118628. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
8
Artificial neural network and partial least square regressions for rapid estimation of cellulose pulp dryness based on near infrared spectroscopic data.基于近红外光谱数据的人工神经网络和偏最小二乘回归用于快速估计纤维素纸浆干燥度
Carbohydr Polym. 2019 Nov 15;224:115186. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115186. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
9
NIR spectroscopy-multivariate analysis for discrimination and bioactive compounds prediction of different Citrus species peels.近红外光谱-多元分析用于区分不同柑橘属果皮和预测生物活性化合物。
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2019 Aug 5;219:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Combining mid infrared spectroscopy and paper spray mass spectrometry in a data fusion model to predict the composition of coffee blends.将中红外光谱和纸喷雾质谱相结合,建立数据融合模型以预测咖啡混合物的成分。
Food Chem. 2019 May 30;281:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.044. Epub 2018 Dec 19.