Belmar da Costa Madalena, Delgado António Hs, Amorim Afonso Tomás, Proença Luís, Ramos Ana Sofia, Mano Azul Ana
Unit of Conservative Dentistry, Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz (IUEM), Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.
Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;13(20):3562. doi: 10.3390/polym13203562.
To compare the adhesive interface of eroded dentin formed by a functional dental adhesive and a gold standard strategy, by testing microtensile bond strength (μTBS), hardness/elastic modulus. Permanent sound human molars were randomly allocated to four experimental groups, all subject to artificial erosion (0.05 M citric acid; 3× daily, 5 days). Groups included control Clearfil SE Bond 2 (CFSE), and experimental group Clearfil SE Protect (CFP), at two different time points-immediate (24 h) and long term (3 months-3 M). Samples were sectioned into microspecimens for μTBS ( = 8) and into 2-mm thick slabs for nanoindentation assays ( = 3). Groups CFSE_3M and CFP_3M were stored in artificial saliva. Statistical analysis included two-way ANOVA for μTBS data, while hardness/modulus results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis H Test (significance level of 5%; SPSS v.27.0). Although no significant differences were found between mean μTBS values, for different adhesives and time points ( > 0.05), a positive trend, with μTBS rising in the CFP_3M group, was observed. Regarding hardness, no significant differences were seen in the hybrid layer, considering the two variables ( > 0.05), while the reduced elastic modulus rose in CFP_3M when compared to 24 h. Thus, CFP shows similar mechanical and adhesive performance to CFSE in eroded dentin, although it may comprise promising long-term results. This is advantageous in eroded substrates due to their increased enzymatic activity and need for remineralization.
通过测试微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)、硬度/弹性模量,比较功能性牙科粘合剂和金标准策略形成的侵蚀牙本质的粘结界面。将健康的恒牙随机分为四个实验组,所有组均进行人工侵蚀(0.05M柠檬酸;每天3次,共5天)。实验组包括对照组Clearfil SE Bond 2(CFSE),以及实验组Clearfil SE Protect(CFP),在两个不同时间点——即刻(24小时)和长期(3个月 - 3M)。将样本切成用于μTBS测试的微样本( = 8),并切成2毫米厚的薄片用于纳米压痕分析( = 3)。CFSE_3M组和CFP_3M组样本保存在人工唾液中。μTBS数据的统计分析采用双向方差分析,而硬度/模量结果采用Kruskal - Wallis H检验进行分析(显著性水平为5%;SPSS v.27.0)。尽管在不同粘合剂和时间点之间,平均μTBS值未发现显著差异( > 0.05),但观察到CFP_3M组的μTBS呈上升的积极趋势。关于硬度,考虑到两个变量,在混合层中未发现显著差异( > 0.05),而与24小时相比,CFP_3M组的弹性模量降低。因此,CFP在侵蚀牙本质中显示出与CFSE相似的机械和粘结性能,尽管它可能具有有前景的长期结果。这在侵蚀性底物中是有利的,因为它们的酶活性增加且需要再矿化。