Schulte-Vieting Tamara, Siegle Anja, Jung Corinna, Villalobos Matthias, Thomas Michael
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstraße 1, D-69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):1689-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of existing methods used to develop a Question Prompt List (QPL) for an oncology setting.
We conducted a search of the literature published between 1999 and 2019 in five online databases followed by a hand search, and extracted data on the methods used to develop a QPL.
A total of 21 studies were included. The review shows differences in the development of older QPLs (1999-2009) and current QPLs (2010-2019). However, most QPLs were developed using interviews or focus groups with patients and an expert session to review or adapt the QPL. Health professionals, patients, and researchers were included in nearly all the studies.
To develop a QPL, it is important to combine several information sources and at least to involve health professionals, patients, and researchers in the development process. Review or evaluation steps can improve the appropriateness and acceptance of a QPL.
Further research is needed to define the type of target population for new QPLs and to develop a framework for their development.
本研究旨在概述用于制定肿瘤学环境下问题提示列表（QPL）的现有方法。
我们在五个在线数据库中检索了1999年至2019年间发表的文献，随后进行了手工检索，并提取了有关制定QPL所使用方法的数据。
共纳入21项研究。该综述显示了较旧的QPL（1999 - 2009年）和当前的QPL（2010 - 2019年）在制定过程中的差异。然而，大多数QPL是通过与患者进行访谈或焦点小组讨论以及专家会议来审查或调整QPL而制定的。几乎所有研究都纳入了卫生专业人员、患者和研究人员。
要制定QPL，重要的是结合多种信息来源，并且至少要让卫生专业人员、患者和研究人员参与到制定过程中。审查或评估步骤可以提高QPL的适用性和可接受性。
需要进一步研究来确定新QPL的目标人群类型，并为其制定建立一个框架。
