Anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-subanalysis from the multicenter LAARGE registry.

PURPOSE

Data regarding post-procedural antithrombotic therapy following percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) in real-world populations using various occluder systems is limited. In the present analysis, anticoagulation (AC) was compared against antiplatelet therapy (APT) using data from the real-world multi-center LAARGE study.

METHODS

Patients following LAA closure enrolled in the LAARGE study were assigned to two groups depending on initial post-implantation antithrombotic regime consisting of either AC or APT. Selection of antithrombotic medication was at the discretion of the treating center and/or physician.

RESULTS

From July 2014 until January 2016, a total of 627 patients at 38 centers were included. A total of 75 patients (12%) received AC and 552 patients (88%) received APT, respectively. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding the composite of death, stroke and systemic embolism 1 year after LAA closure (Kaplan-Meier estimated rate 9.4% for AC vs. 12.8% for APT; p log rank = 0.45). With respect to bleeding events also, no differences were observed 1 year after the procedure (major bleeding 4.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.23; moderate bleeding 4.0% vs. 4.9%, p = 1.00; any bleeding 8.0% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Postprocedural antithrombotic treatment with AC and APT showed comparable results regarding the composite of death, stroke, and systemic embolism as well as regarding bleeding complications after LAA closure in a real-world all-comers population.