Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, China.
Department of Pharmacy and Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, Jiangsu College of Nursing, Huaian, China.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Feb;57(2):194-203. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02919-2. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from their inception to March 2023. Patients were divided into short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) group and antiplatelet therapy (APT) group. The incidence of events were performed using RevMan 5.4. The events including device-related thrombus (DRT), ischemic stroke/systemic embolization (SE), major bleeding, any bleeding, any major adverse event and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis were based on OAC alone or OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in OAC group. Oral anticoagulants include warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Fourteen studies with 35,166 patients were included. We found that the incidence of DRT (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66, P<0.0001) and all-cause mortality (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89, P = 0.002) were significantly lower in OAC group than APT group. However, there was no statistical differences in the incidence rates of ischemic stroke/SE (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.49-1.20, P = 0.25), major bleeding (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.55-1.27, P = 0.84), any bleeding (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.22, P = 0.34) and any major adverse event (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.30-1.03, P = 0.06) in the two groups. Subgroup analysis found that the incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality and any major adverse event in OAC monotherapy were lower than that in APT group (P<0.05), but not statistically different from other outcome. The incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality, any major adverse event and any bleeding in DOAC were significantly better than APT group (P<0.05). While warfarin only has better incidence of DRT than APT (P<0.05), there was no statistical difference between the two groups in other outcome (P>0.05). The incidence of DRT was significantly lower than APT group (P<0.05), major bleeding were higher, and the rest of the outcome did not show any statistically significant differences(P>0.05) when OAC plus SAPT. Based on the existing data, short-term OAC may be favored over APT for patients who undergo LAAC. DOAC monotherapy may be favored over warfarin monotherapy or OAC plus APT, when selecting anticoagulant therapies.
这项荟萃分析比较了左心耳封堵(LAAC)后不同抗栓方案的疗效和安全性。系统检索了 PubMed、Embase、Medline 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,检索时间从建库至 2023 年 3 月。患者分为短期口服抗凝治疗(OAC)组和抗血小板治疗(APT)组。采用 RevMan 5.4 软件进行事件发生率的比较。事件包括器械相关血栓(DRT)、缺血性卒中和全身性栓塞(SE)、大出血、任何出血、任何主要不良事件和全因死亡率。根据 OAC 组中仅使用 OAC 或 OAC 联合单种抗血小板治疗(SAPT)进行亚组分析。口服抗凝剂包括华法林和直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)。共纳入 14 项研究,涉及 35166 例患者。结果发现,OAC 组的 DRT 发生率(OR=0.49,95%CI 0.36-0.66,P<0.0001)和全因死亡率(OR=0.71,95%CI 0.57-0.89,P=0.002)显著低于 APT 组。然而,两组缺血性卒中和 SE 发生率(OR=0.77,95%CI 0.49-1.20,P=0.25)、大出血发生率(OR=0.84,95%CI 0.55-1.27,P=0.84)、任何出血发生率(OR=0.83,95%CI 0.56-1.22,P=0.34)和任何主要不良事件发生率(OR=0.56,95%CI 0.30-1.03,P=0.06)差异均无统计学意义。亚组分析发现,OAC 单药治疗的 DRT、全因死亡率和任何主要不良事件发生率均低于 APT 组(P<0.05),但与其他结局无统计学差异。DOAC 的 DRT、全因死亡率、任何主要不良事件和任何出血发生率均显著优于 APT 组(P<0.05)。而华法林仅在 DRT 发生率方面优于 APT 组(P<0.05),其他结局差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。OAC 联合 SAPT 时,DRT 发生率显著低于 APT 组(P<0.05),大出血发生率较高,其他结局差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。基于现有数据,LAAC 患者短期 OAC 可能优于 APT。在选择抗凝治疗时,DOAC 单药治疗可能优于华法林单药治疗或 OAC 联合 APT。