Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Sorbonne Université, CP 135, 57 Rue Cuvier, 75005, Paris, France; Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Station de Biologie Marine, 1 Place de la Croix, 29900, Concarneau, France.
Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux Auvergne Rhône Alpes, Maison de l'environnement, 14 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.
Environ Pollut. 2022 Jan 1;292(Pt B):118394. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118394. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
Among the most prevalent sources of biodiversity declines, Artificial Light At Night (ALAN) is an emerging threat to global biodiversity. Much knowledge has already been gained to reduce impacts. However, the spatial variation of ALAN effects on biodiversity in interaction with landscape composition remains little studied, though it is of the utmost importance to identify lightscapes most in need of action. Several studies have shown that, at local scale, tree cover can intensify positive or negative effects of ALAN on biodiversity, but none have - at landscape scale - studied a wider range of landscape compositions around lit sites. We hypothesized that the magnitude of ALAN effects will depend on landscape composition and species' tolerance to light. Taking the case of insectivorous bats because of their varying sensitivity to ALAN, we investigated the species-specific activity response to ALAN. Bat activity was recorded along a gradient of light radiance. We ensured a large variability in landscape composition around 253 sampling sites. Among the 13 bat taxa studied, radiance decreased the activity of two groups of the slow-flying gleaner guild (Myotis and Plecotus spp.) and one species of the aerial-hawking guild (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), and increased the activity of two species of the aerial-hawking guild (Pipistrellus kuhlii and Pipistrellus pygmaeus). Among these five effects, the magnitude of four of them was driven by landscape composition. For five other species, ALAN effects were only detectable in particular landscape compositions, making the main effect of radiance undetectable without account for interactions with landscape. Specifically, effects were strongest in non-urban habitats, for both guilds. Results highlight the importance to prioritize ALAN reduction efforts in non-urban habitats, and how important is to account for landscape composition when studying ALAN effects on bats to avoid missing effects.
在生物多样性减少的最主要原因中,人工夜间光照(ALAN)是对全球生物多样性的一个新出现的威胁。已经有很多知识被用来减少其影响。然而,ALAN 对生物多样性的影响与景观组成的空间变化相互作用的研究还很少,尽管确定最需要采取行动的光照景观至关重要。一些研究表明,在局部尺度上,树木覆盖可以加剧 ALAN 对生物多样性的正面或负面影响,但没有研究在景观尺度上,在有光照的地方周围更广泛的景观组成。我们假设,ALAN 影响的程度将取决于景观组成和物种对光的耐受能力。以食虫蝙蝠为例,因为它们对 ALAN 的敏感性不同,我们研究了物种特异性对 ALAN 的活动反应。蝙蝠的活动是沿着光照辐射梯度记录的。我们确保在 253 个采样点周围的景观组成有很大的可变性。在所研究的 13 种蝙蝠中,辐射降低了两种缓慢飞行的觅食者群体(Myotis 和 Plecotus spp.)和一种空中捕食者群体(Pipistrellus pipistrellus)的活动,增加了两种空中捕食者群体(Pipistrellus kuhlii 和 Pipistrellus pygmaeus)的活动。在这五种影响中,其中四种的程度受到景观组成的驱动。对于另外五种蝙蝠,只有在特定的景观组成中才能检测到 ALAN 的影响,因此,如果不考虑与景观的相互作用,就无法检测到辐射的主要影响。具体来说,对于两个群体,在非城市栖息地,影响最大。结果强调了在非城市栖息地优先减少 ALAN 努力的重要性,以及在研究 ALAN 对蝙蝠的影响时,考虑景观组成的重要性,以避免错过影响。