Center for Mobility and Rehabilitation Engineering Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, New Jersey, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
PM R. 2022 Oct;14(10):1207-1218. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12725. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
The application of wearable devices in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) resulting from stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) for monitoring physical activity (PA) has been relatively recent. The current systematic review aims to provide insights into the adaption of these devices, the outcome metrics, and their transition from the laboratory to the community for PA monitoring of individuals with ABI.
The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were systematically reviewed using appropriate search terms. A total of 20 articles were reviewed from the last 15 years.
Articles were classified into three categories: PA measurement studies, PA classification studies, and validation studies. The quality of studies was assessed using a quality appraisal checklist.
It was found that the transition of wearable devices from in-lab to community-based studies in individuals with stroke has started but is not widespread. The transition of wearable devices in the community has not yet started for individuals with TBI. Accelerometer-based devices were more frequently chosen than pedometers and inertial measurement units. No consensus on a preferred wearable device (make or model) or wear location could be identified, although step count was the most common outcome metric. The accuracy and validity of most outcome metrics used in the community were not reported for many studies.
To facilitate future studies using wearable devices for PA measurement in the community, we recommend that researchers provide details on the accuracy and validity of the outcome metrics specific to the study environment. Once the accuracy and validity are established for a specific population, wearable devices and their derived outcomes can provide objective information on mobility impairment as well as the effect of rehabilitation in the community.
可穿戴设备在因中风或创伤性脑损伤(TBI)导致的后天性脑损伤(ABI)个体中用于监测身体活动(PA)的应用相对较新。本系统评价旨在深入了解这些设备的适应性、结果指标以及它们从实验室向社区过渡,以监测 ABI 个体的 PA。
使用适当的搜索词对 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 数据库进行了系统检索。在过去的 15 年中,共审查了 20 篇文章。
文章分为三类:PA 测量研究、PA 分类研究和验证研究。使用质量评估检查表评估研究的质量。
结果发现,可穿戴设备从实验室向中风患者的社区研究的过渡已经开始,但尚未普及。TBI 患者的可穿戴设备在社区中的过渡尚未开始。与计步器和惯性测量单元相比,基于加速度计的设备更常被选择。虽然步数是最常用的结果指标,但尚未确定首选的可穿戴设备(品牌或型号)或佩戴位置的共识。许多研究并未报告社区中使用的大多数结果指标的准确性和有效性。
为了促进未来使用可穿戴设备在社区中进行 PA 测量的研究,我们建议研究人员提供特定于研究环境的结果指标准确性和有效性的详细信息。一旦为特定人群建立了准确性和有效性,可穿戴设备及其衍生的结果就可以提供关于社区中移动障碍以及康复效果的客观信息。