Department of Psychiatry, Referral Centre for Stress Related Disorders of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Croatia, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2022 Feb 1;210(2):104-110. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001417.
The role of coping dispositions in predicting coping with a potentially traumatic event (PTE; situational coping) has been bypassed. We explored the degree to which the dispositional coping of 103 mountain rescuers predicted coping with their last PTE. Dispositional venting of emotions and turning to religion explained more than half of the variance in the use of the same strategy to cope with the PTE. Most coping dispositions predicted about 30% to 40% of the variance in comparable situational coping. Dispositional denial did not predict situational use of denial. Multivariate dispositional coping style explained a great deal of the variance in most situational coping responses. Dispositional coping was more relevant than situational to participants' global psychological distress and explained about one-fourth of the variance in distress. These results suggest that most dispositional styles considerably impact coping with PTE but to the extent that varies across different coping styles.
应对特质在预测应对潜在创伤性事件（PTE；情境应对）中的作用被忽视了。我们探讨了 103 名山地救援人员的特质应对方式在多大程度上预测了他们对上次 PTE 的应对方式。情绪的特质宣泄和转向宗教解释了超过一半的使用相同策略来应对 PTE 的差异。大多数特质应对方式预测了大约 30%到 40%的可比情境应对中的差异。特质否认并不能预测情境中否认的使用。多维特质应对方式解释了大多数情境应对反应中很大一部分的差异。特质应对与参与者的整体心理困扰比情境更相关，解释了困扰的四分之一左右的差异。这些结果表明，大多数特质应对方式对 PTE 的应对有很大影响，但影响程度因不同的应对方式而异。
