• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释新冠疫情期间人们的担忧程度:社会经济和文化维度分析

Explaining People's Worry Levels During the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Socio-Economic and Cultural Dimensions.

作者信息

Rojas-Méndez José I

机构信息

Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 6;12:737917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737917. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737917
PMID:34690892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8528019/
Abstract

This paper examines the influence of socio-economic and cultural dimensions (measured at the country level) on what concerns people the most about the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on secondary data, the study considers the opinion of more than 24,000 individuals living in 30 different countries, with national samples weighted to match each country's general population older than 18years of age. A set of linear Bayesian regressions was applied to 10 different types of worries reported for economic, health, and safety domains. Results demonstrate that socio-economic variables and cultural dimensions complement each other in explaining people's concerns about the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic. An overall view of the analysis also reveals that cultural dimensions exceed socio-economic variables in explaining peoples' worries about health and safety domains. Socio-economic variables are slightly more effective in explaining the worries of the economic domain. Among the cultural dimensions, long-term orientation and uncertainty avoidance are the best in explaining people's worries. The higher the score in long-term orientation, the lower the worry levels expressed by the respondents. Likewise, low scores on uncertainty avoidance generate lower levels of worries due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Finally, health worries produce a positive outcome because they explain a significant reduction in the fatality rate.

摘要

本文考察了社会经济和文化维度(在国家层面进行衡量)对人们最关注的新冠疫情相关问题的影响。基于二手数据,该研究考虑了居住在30个不同国家的24000多名个人的意见,对各国样本进行加权以匹配每个国家18岁以上的普通人群。对经济、健康和安全领域报告的10种不同类型的担忧进行了一组线性贝叶斯回归分析。结果表明,社会经济变量和文化维度在解释人们对新冠疫情影响的担忧方面相互补充。分析的总体情况还显示,在解释人们对健康和安全领域的担忧方面,文化维度超过了社会经济变量。社会经济变量在解释经济领域的担忧方面略为有效。在文化维度中,长期取向和不确定性规避在解释人们的担忧方面表现最佳。长期取向得分越高,受访者表达的担忧水平越低。同样,不确定性规避得分低会因新冠疫情而产生较低的担忧水平。最后,健康担忧产生了积极的结果,因为它们解释了死亡率的显著下降。

相似文献

1
Explaining People's Worry Levels During the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Socio-Economic and Cultural Dimensions.解释新冠疫情期间人们的担忧程度:社会经济和文化维度分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 6;12:737917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737917. eCollection 2021.
2
Socio-cultural Correlates of the COVID-19 Outcomes.社会文化因素与 COVID-19 结局的相关性。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022 Sep;12(3):328-339. doi: 10.1007/s44197-022-00055-3. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
3
How Covid-19 changed economic and health-related worries in Italy.新冠疫情如何改变了意大利人对经济和健康方面的担忧。
SN Bus Econ. 2022;2(12):197. doi: 10.1007/s43546-022-00385-1. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
4
Socio-economic factors, cultural values, national personality and antibiotics use: A cross-cultural study among European countries.社会经济因素、文化价值观、国民性格与抗生素使用:一项欧洲国家的跨文化研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2017 Nov-Dec;10(6):755-760. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.11.011. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
5
Knowledge, Concerns, and Behaviors of Individuals During the First Week of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Italy.意大利人在 2019 冠状病毒病大流行的第一周的知识、担忧和行为。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2015821. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15821.
6
Does cultural background influence the dissemination and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic?文化背景是否会影响新冠疫情的传播及严重程度?
Heliyon. 2022 Feb;8(2):e08907. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08907. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Personal Economic Worries in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross Sectional Study.应对新冠疫情的个人经济担忧:一项横断面研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 30;13:871209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871209. eCollection 2022.
8
Are cultural dimensions relevant for explaining cross-national differences in antibiotic use in Europe?文化维度对于解释欧洲抗生素使用的跨国差异是否相关?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun 6;8:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-123.
9
Psychosocial and Socio-Economic Crisis in Bangladesh Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: A Perception-Based Assessment.孟加拉国因 COVID-19 大流行而导致的心理社会和社会经济危机:基于认知的评估。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 26;8:341. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00341. eCollection 2020.
10
Finding the positives from the COVID-19 pandemic: factors associated with posttraumatic growth among nurses in Hong Kong.从 COVID-19 大流行中寻找积极因素:与香港护士创伤后成长相关的因素。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Feb 7;13(1):2005346. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2005346. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural uncertainty avoidance predicts consumers' affective reactions to chemicals.文化不确定性规避预测消费者对化学物质的情感反应。
Risk Anal. 2025 Jul;45(7):1792-1805. doi: 10.1111/risa.17693. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
2
The association of micro and macro worries with psychological distress in people living with chronic kidney disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,慢性肾脏病患者的微观和宏观担忧与心理困扰之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 22;19(10):e0309519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309519. eCollection 2024.
3
How Can We Increase Pro-environmental Behavior During COVID-19 Pandemic? Focusing on the Altruistic (vs. Egoistic) Concerns.在新冠疫情期间,我们如何增加亲环境行为?关注利他(而非利己)关切。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:870630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870630. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of the effects of health and financial threat on prosocial and antisocial responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of empathic concern.评估新冠疫情期间健康和经济威胁对亲社会和反社会反应的影响:共情关注的中介作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Aug;178:110855. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110855. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Output-weighted optimal sampling for Bayesian regression and rare event statistics using few samples.使用少量样本进行贝叶斯回归和稀有事件统计的输出加权最优采样。
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Feb;476(2234):20190834. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0834. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
3
Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications.贝叶斯推断在心理学中的应用。第一部分:理论优势与实际影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):35-57. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3.
4
The relationship between national culture and safety culture: Implications for international safety culture assessments.国家文化与安全文化之间的关系:对国际安全文化评估的启示。
J Occup Organ Psychol. 2016 Sep;89(3):515-538. doi: 10.1111/joop.12139. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
5
The Money Buffer Effect in China: A Higher Income Cannot Make You Much Happier but Might Allow You to Worry Less.中国的金钱缓冲效应:较高的收入并不能让你更幸福,但可能会让你少些担忧。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 23;7:234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00234. eCollection 2016.
6
Rethinking Rumination.重新思考沉思。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):400-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x.
7
Rumination, worry, cognitive avoidance, and behavioral avoidance: examination of temporal effects.反刍思维、担忧、认知回避和行为回避:时间效应的检验。
Behav Ther. 2012 Sep;43(3):629-40. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
8
Required sample size to detect the mediated effect.检测中介效应所需的样本量。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):233-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x.
9
Comparisons between rumination and worry in a non-clinical population.非临床人群中反刍思维与担忧的比较。
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Dec;43(12):1577-85. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.11.008.
10
Experimental manipulation of intolerance of uncertainty: a study of a theoretical model of worry.不确定性不耐受的实验性操纵:一项关于担忧理论模型的研究
Behav Res Ther. 2000 Sep;38(9):933-41. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00133-3.