Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2015821. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15821.
At the beginning of a public health crisis, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is important to collect information about people's knowledge, worries, and behaviors to examine their influence on quality of life and to understand individual characteristics associated with these reactions. Such information could help to guide health authorities in providing informed interventions and clear communications.
To document the initial knowledge about COVID-19 and recommended health behaviors; to assess worries (ie, one's perception of the influence of the worries of others on oneself), social appraisal, and preventive behaviors, comparing respondents from areas under different movement restrictions during the first week after the outbreak; and to understand how worries, perceived risk, and preventive behaviors were associated with quality of life and individual characteristics among Italian adults.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This convenience sample, nonprobablistic survey study recruited adult participants with a snowballing sampling method in any Italian region during the first week of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy from February 26, 2020, to March 4, 2020. Data were analyzed from March 5 to 12, 2020.
Information was collected from citizens living in the quarantine zone (ie, red zone), area with restricted movements (ie, yellow zone), and COVID-19-free regions (ie, green zone).
Levels of knowledge on the virus, contagion-related worries, social appraisal, and preventive behaviors were assessed with ratings of quality of life (measured using the Short Form Health Survey). Additionally, some individual characteristics that may be associated with worries and behaviors were assessed, including demographic characteristics, personality traits (measured using Big Five Inventory-10), perceived health control (measured using the internal control measure in the Health Locus of Control scale), optimism (measured using the Revised Life Orientation Test), and the need for cognitive closure (measured using the Need for Closure Scale).
A total of 3109 individuals accessed the online questionnaire, and 2886 individuals responded to the questionnaire at least partially (mean [SD] age, 30.7 [13.2] years; 2203 [76.3%] women). Most participants were well informed about the virus characteristics and suggested behaviors, with a mean (SD) score of 77.4% (17.3%) correct answers. Quality of life was similar across the 3 zones (effect size = 0.02), but mental health was negatively associated with contagion-related worries (β = -0.066), social appraisal (β = -0.221), and preventive behaviors (β = -0.066) in the yellow zone (R2 = 0.108). Social appraisal was also associated with reduced psychological well-being in the green zone (β = -0.205; R2 = 0.121). In the yellow zone, higher worries were negatively correlated with emotional stability (β = -0.165; R2 = 0.047). Emotional stability was also negatively associated with perceived susceptibility in the yellow (β = -0.108; R2 = 0.040) and green (β = -0.170; R2 = 0.087) zones. Preventative behaviors and social appraisal were also associated with the need for cognitive closure in both yellow (preventive behavior: β = 0.110; R2 = 0.023; social appraisal β = 0.115; R2 = 0.104) and green (preventive behavior: β = 0.174; R2 = 0.022; social appraisal: 0.261; R2 = 0.137) zones.
These findings suggest that during the first week of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy, people were well informed and had a relatively stable level of worries. Quality of life did not vary across the areas, although mental well-being was challenged by the social appraisal and worries related to the contagion. Increased scores for worries and concerns were associated with more cognitive rigidity and emotional instability.
在公共卫生危机(如 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行)开始时,收集有关人们的知识、担忧和行为的信息以检查其对生活质量的影响并了解与这些反应相关的个体特征非常重要。此类信息有助于指导卫生当局提供知情干预和明确沟通。
记录对 COVID-19 的初步认识和建议的健康行为;评估担忧(即,他人对自己的担忧的看法对自己的影响)、社会评估和预防行为,比较爆发后第一周处于不同运动限制地区的受访者;并了解担忧、感知风险和预防行为如何与意大利成年人的生活质量和个体特征相关联。
设计、地点和参与者:本便利样本、非概率调查研究于 2020 年 2 月 26 日至 3 月 4 日期间从意大利 COVID-19 爆发开始在意大利的任何地区通过滚雪球抽样法招募成年参与者。数据于 2020 年 3 月 5 日至 12 日进行分析。
信息是从隔离区(即红色区域)、限制行动区(即黄色区域)和 COVID-19 无疫区(即绿色区域)的公民那里收集的。
使用生活质量(使用简明健康调查量表评估)评估病毒、传染相关担忧、社会评估和预防行为的水平。此外,还评估了一些可能与担忧和行为相关的个体特征,包括人口统计学特征、人格特质(使用大五人格量表-10 进行测量)、感知健康控制(使用健康控制量表中的内部控制测量进行测量)、乐观(使用修订后的生活态度测试进行测量)和认知封闭需求(使用认知封闭量表进行测量)。
共有 3109 人访问了在线问卷,2886 人至少部分回答了问卷(平均[标准差]年龄,30.7[13.2]岁;2203[76.3%]名女性)。大多数参与者对病毒特征和建议的行为有很好的了解,正确答案的平均(标准差)分数为 77.4%(17.3%)。三个区域的生活质量相似(效应量=0.02),但黄色区域的传染病相关担忧(β=-0.066)、社会评估(β=-0.221)和预防行为(β=-0.066)与心理健康呈负相关)(R2=0.108)。黄色区域的社会评估也与心理幸福感降低有关(β=-0.205;R2=0.121)。在黄色区域,较高的担忧与情绪稳定性呈负相关(β=-0.165;R2=0.047)。情绪稳定性也与黄色(β=-0.108;R2=0.040)和绿色(β=-0.170;R2=0.087)区域的感知易感性呈负相关。预防行为和社会评估也与黄色(预防行为:β=0.110;R2=0.023;社会评估β=0.115;R2=0.104)和绿色(预防行为:β=0.174;R2=0.022;社会评估:β=0.261;R2=0.137)区域的认知封闭需求相关。
这些发现表明,在意大利 COVID-19 爆发的第一周,人们的信息灵通,担忧水平相对稳定。尽管社会评估和传染相关的担忧对心理健康构成挑战,但各地区的生活质量没有差异。担忧和关注的增加与更多的认知僵化和情绪不稳定有关。