• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利人在 2019 冠状病毒病大流行的第一周的知识、担忧和行为。

Knowledge, Concerns, and Behaviors of Individuals During the First Week of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Italy.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2015821. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15821.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15821
PMID:32706385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7382000/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

At the beginning of a public health crisis, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is important to collect information about people's knowledge, worries, and behaviors to examine their influence on quality of life and to understand individual characteristics associated with these reactions. Such information could help to guide health authorities in providing informed interventions and clear communications.

OBJECTIVES

To document the initial knowledge about COVID-19 and recommended health behaviors; to assess worries (ie, one's perception of the influence of the worries of others on oneself), social appraisal, and preventive behaviors, comparing respondents from areas under different movement restrictions during the first week after the outbreak; and to understand how worries, perceived risk, and preventive behaviors were associated with quality of life and individual characteristics among Italian adults.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This convenience sample, nonprobablistic survey study recruited adult participants with a snowballing sampling method in any Italian region during the first week of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy from February 26, 2020, to March 4, 2020. Data were analyzed from March 5 to 12, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Information was collected from citizens living in the quarantine zone (ie, red zone), area with restricted movements (ie, yellow zone), and COVID-19-free regions (ie, green zone).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Levels of knowledge on the virus, contagion-related worries, social appraisal, and preventive behaviors were assessed with ratings of quality of life (measured using the Short Form Health Survey). Additionally, some individual characteristics that may be associated with worries and behaviors were assessed, including demographic characteristics, personality traits (measured using Big Five Inventory-10), perceived health control (measured using the internal control measure in the Health Locus of Control scale), optimism (measured using the Revised Life Orientation Test), and the need for cognitive closure (measured using the Need for Closure Scale).

RESULTS

A total of 3109 individuals accessed the online questionnaire, and 2886 individuals responded to the questionnaire at least partially (mean [SD] age, 30.7 [13.2] years; 2203 [76.3%] women). Most participants were well informed about the virus characteristics and suggested behaviors, with a mean (SD) score of 77.4% (17.3%) correct answers. Quality of life was similar across the 3 zones (effect size = 0.02), but mental health was negatively associated with contagion-related worries (β = -0.066), social appraisal (β = -0.221), and preventive behaviors (β = -0.066) in the yellow zone (R2 = 0.108). Social appraisal was also associated with reduced psychological well-being in the green zone (β = -0.205; R2 = 0.121). In the yellow zone, higher worries were negatively correlated with emotional stability (β = -0.165; R2 = 0.047). Emotional stability was also negatively associated with perceived susceptibility in the yellow (β = -0.108; R2 = 0.040) and green (β = -0.170; R2 = 0.087) zones. Preventative behaviors and social appraisal were also associated with the need for cognitive closure in both yellow (preventive behavior: β = 0.110; R2 = 0.023; social appraisal β = 0.115; R2 = 0.104) and green (preventive behavior: β = 0.174; R2 = 0.022; social appraisal: 0.261; R2 = 0.137) zones.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that during the first week of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy, people were well informed and had a relatively stable level of worries. Quality of life did not vary across the areas, although mental well-being was challenged by the social appraisal and worries related to the contagion. Increased scores for worries and concerns were associated with more cognitive rigidity and emotional instability.

摘要

重要性

在公共卫生危机(如 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行)开始时,收集有关人们的知识、担忧和行为的信息以检查其对生活质量的影响并了解与这些反应相关的个体特征非常重要。此类信息有助于指导卫生当局提供知情干预和明确沟通。

目的

记录对 COVID-19 的初步认识和建议的健康行为;评估担忧(即,他人对自己的担忧的看法对自己的影响)、社会评估和预防行为,比较爆发后第一周处于不同运动限制地区的受访者;并了解担忧、感知风险和预防行为如何与意大利成年人的生活质量和个体特征相关联。

设计、地点和参与者:本便利样本、非概率调查研究于 2020 年 2 月 26 日至 3 月 4 日期间从意大利 COVID-19 爆发开始在意大利的任何地区通过滚雪球抽样法招募成年参与者。数据于 2020 年 3 月 5 日至 12 日进行分析。

暴露

信息是从隔离区(即红色区域)、限制行动区(即黄色区域)和 COVID-19 无疫区(即绿色区域)的公民那里收集的。

主要结果和措施

使用生活质量(使用简明健康调查量表评估)评估病毒、传染相关担忧、社会评估和预防行为的水平。此外,还评估了一些可能与担忧和行为相关的个体特征,包括人口统计学特征、人格特质(使用大五人格量表-10 进行测量)、感知健康控制(使用健康控制量表中的内部控制测量进行测量)、乐观(使用修订后的生活态度测试进行测量)和认知封闭需求(使用认知封闭量表进行测量)。

结果

共有 3109 人访问了在线问卷,2886 人至少部分回答了问卷(平均[标准差]年龄,30.7[13.2]岁;2203[76.3%]名女性)。大多数参与者对病毒特征和建议的行为有很好的了解,正确答案的平均(标准差)分数为 77.4%(17.3%)。三个区域的生活质量相似(效应量=0.02),但黄色区域的传染病相关担忧(β=-0.066)、社会评估(β=-0.221)和预防行为(β=-0.066)与心理健康呈负相关)(R2=0.108)。黄色区域的社会评估也与心理幸福感降低有关(β=-0.205;R2=0.121)。在黄色区域,较高的担忧与情绪稳定性呈负相关(β=-0.165;R2=0.047)。情绪稳定性也与黄色(β=-0.108;R2=0.040)和绿色(β=-0.170;R2=0.087)区域的感知易感性呈负相关。预防行为和社会评估也与黄色(预防行为:β=0.110;R2=0.023;社会评估β=0.115;R2=0.104)和绿色(预防行为:β=0.174;R2=0.022;社会评估:β=0.261;R2=0.137)区域的认知封闭需求相关。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,在意大利 COVID-19 爆发的第一周,人们的信息灵通,担忧水平相对稳定。尽管社会评估和传染相关的担忧对心理健康构成挑战,但各地区的生活质量没有差异。担忧和关注的增加与更多的认知僵化和情绪不稳定有关。

相似文献

1
Knowledge, Concerns, and Behaviors of Individuals During the First Week of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Italy.意大利人在 2019 冠状病毒病大流行的第一周的知识、担忧和行为。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2015821. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15821.
2
Inappropriate risk perception for SARS-CoV-2 infection among Italian HCWs in the eve of COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情前夕,意大利医护人员对新冠病毒感染存在不当的风险认知。
Acta Biomed. 2020 May 14;91(3):e2020040. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i3.9727.
3
Factors Associated With Mental Health Disorders Among University Students in France Confined During the COVID-19 Pandemic.法国 COVID-19 大流行期间被隔离的大学生心理健康障碍相关因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025591. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25591.
4
Online Information Exchange and Anxiety Spread in the Early Stage of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak in South Korea: Structural Topic Model and Network Analysis.韩国新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情早期的在线信息交流与焦虑传播:结构主题模型与网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19455. doi: 10.2196/19455.
5
Effects of Internet Hospital Consultations on Psychological Burdens and Disease Knowledge During the Early Outbreak of COVID-19 in China: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.中国新冠疫情早期互联网医院咨询对心理负担和疾病知识的影响:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 4;22(8):e19551. doi: 10.2196/19551.
6
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.
7
A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-reported beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors.一项关于公众对 COVID-19 大流行看法的全国性横断面调查:自我报告的信念、知识和行为。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 23;15(10):e0241259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241259. eCollection 2020.
8
COVID-19 and Iranian Medical Students; A Survey on Their Related-Knowledge, Preventive Behaviors and Risk Perception.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)与伊朗医学生;一项关于其相关知识、预防行为和风险感知的调查。
Arch Iran Med. 2020 Apr 1;23(4):249-254. doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.06.
9
The Recommended and Excessive Preventive Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Community-Based Online Survey in China.《COVID-19 大流行期间的推荐和过度预防行为:中国基于社区的在线调查》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 23;17(19):6953. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17196953.
10
Prevalence of and Risk Factors Associated With Mental Health Symptoms Among the General Population in China During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.中国新冠肺炎大流行期间普通人群心理健康症状的患病率及其相关危险因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2014053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14053.

引用本文的文献

1
Illness Expectations and Asthma Symptoms: A 6-Month Longitudinal Study.疾病预期与哮喘症状:一项为期6个月的纵向研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70285. doi: 10.1111/hex.70285.
2
COVID-19 Knowledge Among Sexual and Gender Minority Adults in New York City.纽约市性少数和性别少数成年人对新冠病毒的了解情况
LGBT Health. 2025 Feb-Mar;12(2):152-162. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0277. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
3
Factors influencing risk perception during Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC): a scoping review.影响国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC)期间风险感知的因素:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 22;24(1):1372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18832-z.
4
Factors Associated With Levels of Public Engagement in Protective Behaviors During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: Causal-Comparative Study Based on the Health Belief Model.与 COVID-19 大流行早期公众参与防护行为水平相关的因素:基于健康信念模型的因果比较研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Dec 19;10:e49687. doi: 10.2196/49687.
5
The Contribution of Meaning Making and Religiosity to Individuals' Psychological Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prosocial Orientation Matters.意义建构和宗教信仰对新冠疫情期间个体心理健康的贡献:亲社会取向很重要。
Eur J Psychol. 2023 May 31;19(2):192-206. doi: 10.5964/ejop.9389. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Decision-making process about prenatal genetic screening: how deeply do moms-to-be want to know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?产前基因筛查决策过程:孕妇对非侵入性产前检测的知情意愿有多深?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 18;23(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05272-z.
7
The Role of Trust in COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Considerations from a Systematic Review.信任在 COVID-19 疫苗接种接受中的作用:来自系统综述的考虑。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 30;20(1):665. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010665.
8
Knowledge About COVID-19 Symptoms, Transmission, and Prevention: The Relationship With Cognitive Status in Older Adults.关于新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)症状、传播及预防的知识:与老年人认知状态的关系
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022 Sep 9;8:23337214221123708. doi: 10.1177/23337214221123708. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Need for cognitive closure and trust towards government predicting pandemic behavior and mental health: comparing United States and China.对认知闭合的需求以及对政府预测疫情行为和心理健康的信任:美国与中国的比较
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jul 5:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03327-0.
10
Coping and Resilience Among Endurance Athletes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间耐力运动员的应对方式与恢复力
Front Psychol. 2022 May 19;13:811499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.811499. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial JTH 16 -The Coronavirus Disease COVID-19 and implications for transport and health.社论《交通卫生杂志》第16期——冠状病毒病COVID-19及其对交通和健康的影响。
J Transp Health. 2020 Mar;16:100853. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100853. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
2
How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?基于国家的缓解措施将如何影响新冠疫情的发展进程?
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931-934. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
3
The response of Milan's Emergency Medical System to the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy.米兰紧急医疗系统对意大利新冠疫情的应对。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):e49-e50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30493-1. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.隔离的心理影响及其减轻方法:快速综述证据。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
5
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.《中国 2019 年冠状病毒病临床特征》
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
6
A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.一场引发全球卫生关注的新型冠状病毒疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
Intragroup Emotion Convergence: Beyond Contagion and Social Appraisal.群体内情绪趋同:超越传染和社会评价。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 May;24(2):121-140. doi: 10.1177/1088868319882596. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
8
Dispositional optimism and physical health: A long look back, a quick look forward.性格乐观与身体健康:回顾过去,展望未来。
Am Psychol. 2018 Dec;73(9):1082-1094. doi: 10.1037/amp0000384.
9
A Systematic, Thematic Review of Social and Occupational Factors Associated With Psychological Outcomes in Healthcare Employees During an Infectious Disease Outbreak.一项关于传染病爆发期间与医护人员心理结果相关的社会和职业因素的系统、主题式综述。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Mar;60(3):248-257. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001235.
10
Being mindful about mindfulness.对正念保持正念。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;2(4):288-9. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00041-3. Epub 2015 Mar 31.