• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Replies to the commentaries on the question of 'Is it time to abandon the biological species concept?'.对关于“是时候摒弃生物物种概念了吗？”这一问题的评论的回应。
Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Aug;7(8):1407-1409. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa117. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
Replies to commentaries on beyond playing 20 questions with nature.对超越与自然玩二十个问题的评论的回复。
Behav Brain Sci. 2024 Feb 5;47:e65. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23002789.
3
The Emperor Is Naked: Replies to commentaries on the target article.《皇帝没穿衣服：对目标文章评论的回应》
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 29;45:e219. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22000656.
4
The Porosity of Autonomy: (Some) Replies to Open Peer Commentaries on "The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine".自主性的孔隙度：对关于《自主性的孔隙度：生物医学中患者的社会与生物构成》的公开同行评论的（部分）回应
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(4):W4-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1145757.
5
Replies to commentaries on ATP changes during sleep.对睡眠期间ATP变化相关评论的回复。
Sleep. 2011 Jul 1;34(7):841-3. doi: 10.5665/SLEEP.1110.
6
Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: when and why?: Practice Recommendations of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing: Expert Commentaries by Invited Authors and Replies by Guest Editors Contributors from South America.精子DNA碎片化检测：时机与原因？：精子DNA碎片化检测的实践建议：特邀作者的专家评论及南美客座编辑和撰稿人的回复
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Sep;6(Suppl 4):S504-S505. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.44.
7
Cultural evolution in the science of culture and cultural evolution.文化与文化进化科学中的文化进化。
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:31-51. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
8
Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: article overview: Practice Recommendations of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing: Expert Commentaries by Invited Authors and Replies by Guest Editors Contributors from Europe.精子DNA碎片化检测的临床应用：文章概述：精子DNA碎片化检测的实践建议：欧洲特邀作者的专家评论及客座编辑的回复
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Sep;6(Suppl 4):S532-S534. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.02.05.
9
Commentary on clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Practice Recommendations of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing: Expert Commentaries by Invited Authors and Replies by Guest Editors Contributors from North America.精子DNA碎片检测临床应用述评：精子DNA碎片检测的实践建议：北美特邀作者专家述评及客座编辑回复
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Sep;6(Suppl 4):S374-S376. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.01.16.
10
'It's hard to write a good article': The online comprehension of excuses as indirect replies.“写出一篇好文章很难”：作为间接回应的借口的在线理解
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1265-1269. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1327546. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic diversity of a short-ranged endemic terrestrial snail.一种短距离分布的地方性陆生蜗牛的遗传多样性
Ecol Evol. 2023 Nov 28;13(11):e10785. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10785. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
What are species and how are they formed?什么是物种以及它们是如何形成的？
Natl Sci Rev. 2023 Feb 9;9(12):nwad017. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad017. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Extensive gene flow in secondary sympatry after allopatric speciation.异域物种形成后次生同域分布中的广泛基因流动。
Natl Sci Rev. 2022 Dec 12;9(12):nwac280. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac280. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
A Revised Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution: Introducing the MATE 2.0.进化论接受度的修订衡量指标：介绍 MATE 2.0。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Mar;21(1):ar10. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-05-0127.

本文引用的文献

1
Alternative views of biological species: reproductively isolated units or genotypic clusters?生物物种的不同观点：生殖隔离单位还是基因型簇？
Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Aug;7(8):1401-1407. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa116. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Is it time to abandon the biological species concept? No.是时候摒弃生物物种概念了吗？不。
Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Aug;7(8):1400-1401. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa109. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
While neither universally applicable nor practical operationally, the biological species concept continues to offer a compelling framework for studying species and speciation.尽管生物物种概念既不具有普遍适用性，在实际操作中也不可行，但它仍然为研究物种及物种形成提供了一个引人注目的框架。
Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Aug;7(8):1398-1400. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa108. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
Genes and speciation: is it time to abandon the biological species concept?基因与物种形成：是时候摒弃生物物种概念了吗？
Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Aug;7(8):1387-1397. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz220. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
5
Speciation with gene flow via cycles of isolation and migration: insights from multiple mangrove taxa.通过隔离和迁移循环实现的基因流物种形成：来自多个红树林类群的见解。
Natl Sci Rev. 2019 Mar;6(2):275-288. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwy078. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
6
Adaptive introgression: a plant perspective.适应性基因渐渗：植物视角。
Biol Lett. 2018 Mar;14(3). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0688.
7
Can genomic data alone tell us whether speciation happened with gene flow?仅凭基因组数据就能告诉我们物种形成是否伴随着基因流动吗？
Mol Ecol. 2017 Jun;26(11):2845-2849. doi: 10.1111/mec.14117. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
A genomic perspective on hybridization and speciation.杂交与物种形成的基因组学视角
Mol Ecol. 2016 Jun;25(11):2337-60. doi: 10.1111/mec.13557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
9
Hybridization and speciation.杂交与物种形成。
J Evol Biol. 2013 Feb;26(2):229-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x.
10
Reconciling extremely strong barriers with high levels of gene exchange in annual sunflowers.在一年生向日葵中，高度基因交流与极强的障碍相协调。
Evolution. 2012 May;66(5):1459-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01537.x. Epub 2012 Jan 3.

Replies to the commentaries on the question of 'Is it time to abandon the biological species concept?'.

作者信息

Wu Chung-I, Wang Xinfeng, He Ziwen, Shi Suhua

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Key Lab of Plant Resources, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, China.

出版信息

Natl Sci Rev. 2020 Aug;7(8):1407-1409. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa117. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1093/nsr/nwaa117
PMID:34692170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8289014/
Abstract
摘要