Wang Xinfeng, He Ziwen, Guo Zixiao, Yang Ming, Xu Shaohua, Chen Qipian, Shao Shao, Li Sen, Zhong Cairong, Duke Norman C, Shi Suhua
State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, School of Life Sciences, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou510275, China.
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai200438, China.
Natl Sci Rev. 2022 Dec 12;9(12):nwac280. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac280. eCollection 2022 Dec.
In the conventional view, species are separate gene pools delineated by reproductive isolation (RI). In an alternative view, species may also be delineated by a small set of 'speciation genes' without full RI, a view that has gained broad acceptance. A recent survey, however, suggested that the extensive literature on 'speciation with gene flow' is mostly (if not all) about exchanges in the early stages of speciation. There is no definitive evidence that the observed gene flow actually happened after speciation is completed. Here, we wish to know whether 'good species' (defined by the 'secondary sympatry' test) do continue to exchange genes and, importantly, under what conditions such exchanges can be observed. whole-genome assembly and re-sequencing of individuals across the range of two closely related mangrove species ( and ) reveal the genomes to be well delineated in allopatry. They became sympatric in northeastern Australia but remain distinct species. Nevertheless, their genomes harbor ∼4000-10 000 introgression blocks averaging only about 3-4 Kb. These fine-grained introgressions indicate continual gene flow long after speciation as non-introgressable 'genomic islets,' ∼1.4 Kb in size, often harbor diverging genes of flower or gamete development. The fine-grained introgression in secondary sympatry may help settle the debate about sympatric vs. micro-allopatric speciation. In conclusion, true 'good species' may often continue to exchange genes but the opportunity for detection is highly constrained.
按照传统观点,物种是由生殖隔离(RI)划分的独立基因库。另一种观点认为,物种也可能由一小部分“物种形成基因”划分,而不存在完全的生殖隔离,这一观点已得到广泛认可。然而,最近的一项调查表明,大量关于“基因流导致物种形成”的文献大多(如果不是全部的话)是关于物种形成早期阶段的基因交流。没有确凿证据表明观察到的基因流实际上发生在物种形成完成之后。在这里,我们想知道“好物种”(由“二次同域分布”测试定义)是否确实继续进行基因交流,重要的是,在什么条件下可以观察到这种交流。对两个密切相关的红树林物种( 和 )分布范围内的个体进行全基因组组装和重测序,结果表明在异域分布时基因组有明确的划分。它们在澳大利亚东北部成为同域分布,但仍然是不同的物种。然而,它们的基因组含有约4000 - 10000个渐渗片段,平均长度仅约3 - 4千碱基对。这些精细的渐渗表明在物种形成很久之后仍有持续的基因流,因为大小约为1.4千碱基对的不可渐渗“基因组岛”往往含有花或配子发育的分化基因。二次同域分布中的精细渐渗可能有助于解决关于同域物种形成与微异域物种形成的争论。总之,真正的“好物种”可能常常继续进行基因交流,但检测到这种交流的机会受到极大限制。