• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用评分细则提高内科住院医师不良事件报告质量

Use of a Rubric to Improve the Quality of Internal Medicine Resident Event Reporting.

机构信息

Clinical Instructor, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist.

Second-Year Medical Student, Baylor College of Medicine.

出版信息

MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Oct 11;17:11189. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11189. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11189
PMID:34692995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8502786/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As frontline providers, residents report patient safety events and provide crucial safety feedback. Specific ACGME and AAMC requirements for graduating residents include active participation in event reporting and patient safety investigations. However, formal training on what information a quality event report should include to effect real change in the health care system is lacking.

METHODS

This practical, interactive, case-based workshop educates residents on the key components of a quality event report in a 1-hour time frame. The scoring rubric offers quantitative feedback on the quality of information provided in residents' own event reports. The materials include a presentation template, sample teaching points, pre- and posttraining patient safety cases for residents to complete their own event reports about, and a standardized rubric to score event reports for feedback.

RESULTS

During the fall of 2019, 198 internal medicine residents completed the workshop, and 143 matched pre- and postcourse surveys were reviewed. Residents' ability to correctly identify the key concepts of an event report improved from a median score of 4 to 8 ( < .001). After completion of training, residents reported increased knowledge regarding the content of an effective event report ( < .001) and increased confidence in their ability to write one ( < .001).

DISCUSSION

Residents' knowledge of key event-reporting concepts and confidence in reporting improved after completion of the workshop. This brief interactive training and its novel rubric can be used as a standardized tool for patient safety curricula in academic training programs.

摘要

简介

作为一线医护人员,住院医师报告患者安全事件并提供重要的安全反馈。ACGME 和 AAMC 对即将毕业的住院医师的具体要求包括积极参与事件报告和患者安全调查。然而,缺乏关于质量事件报告应包含哪些信息才能真正改变医疗体系的正式培训。

方法

本实用、互动、基于案例的研讨会在 1 小时的时间内为住院医师提供关于质量事件报告的关键内容的教育。评分标准为住院医师自己的事件报告中提供的信息质量提供定量反馈。材料包括演示文稿模板、示例教学要点、住院医师完成自己的事件报告所需的预培训和后培训患者安全案例,以及用于反馈的标准化评分标准。

结果

2019 年秋季,198 名内科住院医师参加了该研讨会,共审查了 143 份匹配的课前和课后调查。住院医师正确识别事件报告关键概念的能力从中位数 4 提高到 8(<0.001)。培训完成后,住院医师报告说,他们对有效事件报告的内容有了更多的了解(<0.001),并对自己编写报告的能力更有信心(<0.001)。

讨论

住院医师对关键事件报告概念的了解和报告的信心在完成研讨会后有所提高。这种简短的互动培训及其新颖的评分标准可以作为学术培训计划中患者安全课程的标准化工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/978a/8502786/4b3ae9945981/mep_2374-8265.11189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/978a/8502786/9db50c4d8415/mep_2374-8265.11189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/978a/8502786/4b3ae9945981/mep_2374-8265.11189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/978a/8502786/9db50c4d8415/mep_2374-8265.11189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/978a/8502786/4b3ae9945981/mep_2374-8265.11189-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of a Rubric to Improve the Quality of Internal Medicine Resident Event Reporting.使用评分细则提高内科住院医师不良事件报告质量
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Oct 11;17:11189. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11189. eCollection 2021.
2
"Residents as Teachers" Workshop Improves Knowledge, Confidence, and Feedback Skills for General Surgery Residents.“住院医师担任教师”工作坊提高了普通外科住院医师的知识、信心和反馈技能。
J Surg Educ. 2020 Jul-Aug;77(4):757-764. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
House Staff Participation in Patient Safety Reporting: Identification of Predominant Barriers and Implementation of a Pilot Program.住院医师参与患者安全报告:主要障碍的识别与试点项目的实施。
South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):395-400. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000486.
4
A resident-led initiative to improve patient safety event reporting in an internal medicine residency program.一项由住院医师主导的旨在改善内科住院医师培训项目中患者安全事件报告的倡议。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2020 May 21;10(2):111-116. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2020.1740507.
5
Chief of Residents for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety: A Recipe for a New Role in Graduate Medical Education.质量改进与患者安全住院总医师:研究生医学教育新角色的秘诀
Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1747-e1751. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00179.
6
Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel High-Value Care Curriculum in a Single Academic Surgery Department.单一学术外科科室中新型高价值医疗课程的实施与评估
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jan;232(1):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.770. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
7
Outpatient Advance Care Planning Internal Medicine Resident Curriculum: Valuing Our Patients' Wishes.门诊预立医疗计划内科住院医师课程:重视患者意愿
J Palliat Med. 2016 Jul;19(7):734-45. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0313. Epub 2016 May 31.
8
Evaluation of a staged case-based discussion curriculum in standardized residency training.评估标准化住院医师培训中的分阶段基于案例的讨论课程。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2020 Mar;48(2):128-133. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21321. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
9
Resident Workshop Standardizes Patient Handoff and Improves Quality, Confidence, and Knowledge.住院医师研讨会规范了患者交接流程,提高了质量、信心和知识水平。
South Med J. 2017 Sep;110(9):571-577. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000698.
10
Early Immersion in Team-Based Event Review: Experiential Patient Safety Education for PGY 1 Internal Medicine Residents.早期沉浸于团队为基础的事件回顾:PGY1 内科住院医师的体验式患者安全教育。
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Jan 23;20:11376. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11376. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
What Do We Know About Contemporary Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Training Curricula in Health Workers? A Rapid Scoping Review.我们对卫生工作者的当代质量改进和患者安全培训课程了解多少?一项快速范围审查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 16;13(12):1445. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121445.
2
Education Research: Sustained Implementation of Quality Improvement Practices Is Observed in Early Career Physicians Following a Neurology Resident QI Curriculum.教育研究:在接受神经病学住院医师质量改进课程后,早期职业医师中观察到质量改进实践的持续实施。
Neurol Educ. 2024 Jun 10;3(2):e200137. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200137. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
A Narrative Review of Strategies to Increase Patient Safety Event Reporting by Residents.住院医师提高患者安全事件报告策略的叙事性综述
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Aug;12(4):415-424. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00649.1.
2
Patient Safety Escape Room: A Graduate Medical Education Simulation for Event Reporting.患者安全密室逃脱:用于事件报告的毕业后医学教育模拟
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Dec 27;15:10868. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10868.
3
Primer in Patient Safety Concepts: Simulation Case-Based Training for Pediatric Residents and Fellows.患者安全概念基础:面向儿科住院医师和研究员的基于模拟案例的培训
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Apr 27;14:10711. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10711.
4
An Inpatient Patient Safety Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.面向儿科住院医师的住院患者安全课程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Apr 13;14:10705. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10705.
5
SAFEST: Use of a Rubric to Teach Safety Reporting to Pediatric House Officers.SAFEST:使用评分标准向儿科住院医师传授安全报告
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2017 Nov 8;2(6):e045. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000045. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.
6
The Survey Checklist (Manifesto).调查问卷清单(宣言)。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):360-366. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002083.
7
Enhancing Patient Safety Event Reporting. A Systematic Review of System Design Features.加强患者安全事件报告:系统设计特征的系统评价
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Aug 30;8(3):893-909. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-02-R-0023.
8
International recommendations for national patient safety incident reporting systems: an expert Delphi consensus-building process.国家患者安全事件报告系统的国际建议:专家德尔菲共识达成过程
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):150-163. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004456. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
9
The problem with incident reporting.事件报告的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Feb;25(2):71-5. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004732. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
10
Elucidating Reasons for Resident Underutilization of Electronic Adverse Event Reporting.阐明住院医师未充分利用电子不良事件报告的原因。
Am J Med Qual. 2016 Jul;31(4):308-14. doi: 10.1177/1062860615574504. Epub 2015 Mar 9.