• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I 期肿瘤学试验中疗效扩展的最优单阶段设计和分析。

Optimal one-stage design and analysis for efficacy expansion in Phase I oncology trials.

机构信息

Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;18(6):673-680. doi: 10.1177/17407745211052486. Epub 2021 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1177/17407745211052486
PMID:34693772
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contemporary Phase I oncology trials often include efficacy expansion in various tumor indications post dose finding. Preliminary anti-tumor activity from efficacy expansion can aid Go/No-Go decision for Phase 2 or Phase 3 initiation. Tumor cohorts in efficacy expansion are commonly analyzed independently in practice, which are often underpowered due to small sample size. Pooled analysis is also sometimes conducted, but it ignores the heterogeneity of the anti-tumor activity across cohorts.

METHODS

We propose an optimal one-stage design and analysis strategy for the efficacy expansion to assess whether the treatment is effective. Allowing heterogeneous anti-tumor effects across tumor cohorts, inactive cohorts are pruned, and the potentially active cohorts are pooled together to gain study power. For a prospective design with a target power, the total sample size across all cohorts is minimized; or for an ad hoc analysis with pre-specified sample size for each cohort, the pruning criteria are optimized to achieve maximum power. The global type I error is controlled after proper multiplicity adjustment, and a penalty adjusted significance level is used for the pooled test.

RESULTS

Simulation studies show that the proposed optimal design has desirable operating characteristics in increasing the overall power and detecting more true positive tumor cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The proposed optimal design and analysis strategy provides a practical approach to design and analyze heterogeneous efficacy expansion cohorts in a basket setting with global type I and type II error being controlled.

摘要

背景

当代肿瘤学 I 期临床试验通常在确定剂量后在各种肿瘤适应证中进行疗效扩展。来自疗效扩展的初步抗肿瘤活性可以辅助 2 期或 3 期启动的 Go/No-Go 决策。在实践中,疗效扩展中的肿瘤队列通常独立进行分析,但由于样本量小,通常效力不足。有时也会进行汇总分析,但它忽略了队列间抗肿瘤活性的异质性。

方法

我们提出了一种用于疗效扩展的最优单阶段设计和分析策略,以评估治疗是否有效。允许肿瘤队列之间存在异质性抗肿瘤作用,剔除无活性的队列,并将潜在的活性队列汇集在一起以获得研究效力。对于具有目标效力的前瞻性设计,最小化所有队列的总样本量;对于具有每个队列预先指定样本量的特定分析,优化剔除标准以获得最大效力。适当的多重调整后控制总体 I 类错误,并使用调整后的显著性水平进行汇总检验。

结果

模拟研究表明,所提出的最优设计在提高总体效力和检测更多真实阳性肿瘤队列方面具有理想的操作特征。

结论

所提出的最优设计和分析策略提供了一种实用的方法,可用于设计和分析篮子设置中具有总体 I 类和 II 类错误控制的异质性疗效扩展队列。

相似文献

1
Optimal one-stage design and analysis for efficacy expansion in Phase I oncology trials.I 期肿瘤学试验中疗效扩展的最优单阶段设计和分析。
Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;18(6):673-680. doi: 10.1177/17407745211052486. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
2
An optimal two-stage exploratory basket trial design with aggregated futility analysis.具有聚合失效分析的最优两阶段探索性篮子试验设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 May;116:106741. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106741. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
Optimal two-stage designs for exploratory basket trials.探索性篮子试验的最优两阶段设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;85:105807. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
4
Optimal Sequential Predictive Probability Designs for Early-Phase Oncology Expansion Cohorts.最优序贯预测概率设计在肿瘤早期扩展队列中的应用。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Mar;6:e2100390. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00390.
5
Bayesian basket trial design with false-discovery rate control.贝叶斯篮子试验设计与错误发现率控制。
Clin Trials. 2022 Jun;19(3):297-306. doi: 10.1177/17407745211073624. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
6
[The role of the expansion cohort in phase I trials in oncology: guidelines of the phase I HUB].[扩展队列在肿瘤学I期试验中的作用:I期HUB指南]
Bull Cancer. 2015 Jan;102(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2014.10.001. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
A stratified adaptive two-stage design with co-primary endpoints for phase II clinical oncology trials.分层适应性两阶段设计,具有针对 II 期临床肿瘤学试验的共同主要终点。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01748-w.
8
Increasing the efficiency of oncology basket trials using a Bayesian approach.使用贝叶斯方法提高肿瘤学篮子试验的效率。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Dec;63:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
9
Adaptive designs for single-arm phase II trials in oncology.肿瘤学中单臂II期试验的适应性设计
Pharm Stat. 2012 May-Jun;11(3):241-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.541. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
Optimal, minimax and admissible two-stage design for phase II oncology clinical trials.最优、最小最大化和可接受的两阶段设计用于肿瘤学 II 期临床试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 20;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01017-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A bootstrapping method to optimize go/no-go decisions from single-arm, signal-finding studies in oncology.一种自举法,用于优化肿瘤学中单臂、信号发现研究中的是/否决策。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024 Aug;13(8):1317-1326. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13161. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
Basket trials in oncology: a systematic review of practices and methods, comparative analysis of innovative methods, and an appraisal of a missed opportunity.肿瘤学中的篮子试验:实践与方法的系统评价、创新方法的比较分析以及对错失机遇的评估
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 14;13:1266286. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1266286. eCollection 2023.