• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种自举法,用于优化肿瘤学中单臂、信号发现研究中的是/否决策。

A bootstrapping method to optimize go/no-go decisions from single-arm, signal-finding studies in oncology.

机构信息

Modeling and Simulation, Vantage Research, Chennai, India.

Modeling and Simulation, Generable, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024 Aug;13(8):1317-1326. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13161. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1002/psp4.13161
PMID:38863167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11330177/
Abstract

Phase Ib trials are common in oncology development but often are not powered for statistical significance. Go/no-go decisions are largely driven by observed trends in response data. We applied a bootstrapping method to systematically compare tumor dynamic end points to historical control data to identify drugs with clinically meaningful efficacy. A proprietary mathematical model calibrated to phase Ib anti-PD-1 therapy trial data (KEYNOTE-001) was used to simulate thousands of phase Ib trials (n = 30) with a combination of anti-PD-1 therapy and four novel agents with varying efficacy. A redacted bootstrapping method compared these results to a simulated phase III control arm (N = 511) while adjusting for differences in trial duration and cohort size to determine the probability that the novel agent provides clinically meaningful efficacy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed strong ability to separate drugs with modest (area under ROC [AUROC] = 83%), moderate (AUROC = 96%), and considerable efficacy (AUROC = 99%) from placebo in early-phase trials (n = 30). The method was shown to effectively move drugs with a range of efficacy through an in silico pipeline with an overall success rate of 93% and false-positive rate of 7.5% from phase I to phase III. This model allows for effective comparisons of tumor dynamics from early clinical trials with more mature historical control data and provides a framework to predict drug efficacy in early-phase trials. We suggest this method should be employed to improve decision making in early oncology trials.

摘要

Ib 期临床试验在肿瘤学发展中很常见,但通常没有统计学意义的功效。是/否决策主要取决于反应数据的观察趋势。我们应用了一种自举方法,系统地将肿瘤动态终点与历史对照数据进行比较,以确定具有临床意义疗效的药物。一种专有的数学模型经过 Ib 期抗 PD-1 治疗试验数据(KEYNOTE-001)校准,用于模拟数千个 Ib 期试验(n=30),其中包括抗 PD-1 治疗和四种新型药物的组合,这些药物的疗效各不相同。一种经过编辑的自举方法将这些结果与模拟的 III 期对照臂(n=511)进行了比较,同时考虑了试验持续时间和队列大小的差异,以确定新型药物具有临床意义疗效的可能性。接受者操作特征(ROC)分析显示,在早期试验(n=30)中,该方法具有较强的区分能力,能够区分疗效适中(ROC 下面积 [AUROC] = 83%)、中度(AUROC = 96%)和显著疗效(AUROC = 99%)的药物与安慰剂。该方法被证明可以有效地将具有不同疗效的药物通过一个计算管道,总体成功率为 93%,假阳性率为 7.5%,从 I 期到 III 期。该模型允许将早期临床试验中的肿瘤动力学与更成熟的历史对照数据进行有效比较,并提供了一种预测早期临床试验中药物疗效的框架。我们建议采用这种方法来改善早期肿瘤学试验中的决策制定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/11330177/6382df206769/PSP4-13-1317-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/11330177/ce8ddf7cbbc5/PSP4-13-1317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/11330177/50d76b4a7f79/PSP4-13-1317-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/11330177/521270cff6ac/PSP4-13-1317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/11330177/6382df206769/PSP4-13-1317-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/11330177/ce8ddf7cbbc5/PSP4-13-1317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/11330177/50d76b4a7f79/PSP4-13-1317-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/11330177/521270cff6ac/PSP4-13-1317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/11330177/6382df206769/PSP4-13-1317-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A bootstrapping method to optimize go/no-go decisions from single-arm, signal-finding studies in oncology.一种自举法,用于优化肿瘤学中单臂、信号发现研究中的是/否决策。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024 Aug;13(8):1317-1326. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13161. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
Comparison of Duration of Response vs Conventional Response Rates and Progression-Free Survival as Efficacy End Points in Simulated Immuno-oncology Clinical Trials.比较免疫肿瘤学临床试验中反应持续时间与传统缓解率和无进展生存期作为疗效终点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218175. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8175.
3
Optimal decision-making in oncology development programs based on probability of success for phase III utilizing phase II/III data on response and overall survival.基于利用 II/III 期数据评估反应和总生存期的 III 期成功率,优化肿瘤开发项目的决策。
Pharm Stat. 2020 Nov;19(6):861-881. doi: 10.1002/pst.2042. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
4
The use of phase 2 interim analysis to expedite drug development decisions.使用2期中期分析来加快药物研发决策。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 20.
5
Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.单臂与随机化 II 期癌症临床试验中错误率的比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1936-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5489. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
6
Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.分子靶向药物肿瘤学试验的无缝I/II期适应性设计
J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(5):903-20. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.920873. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
7
Evaluation of Deviation From Planned Cohort Size and Operating Characteristics of Phase 1 Trials.评估一期试验中与计划队列规模的偏差及操作特征
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037563. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37563.
8
Bayesian optimal phase II designs with dual-criterion decision making.贝叶斯最优 II 期设计与双重标准决策。
Pharm Stat. 2023 Jul-Aug;22(4):605-618. doi: 10.1002/pst.2296. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
9
Statistical controversies in clinical research: building the bridge to phase II-efficacy estimation in dose-expansion cohorts.临床研究中的统计学争议:搭建通向剂量扩展队列中II期疗效评估的桥梁。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(7):1427-1435. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx045.
10
The performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I clinical trials in oncology : A quantitative comparison of the performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I trials with molecularly targeted anticancer drugs over the last 2 years.基于模型与基于规则的肿瘤学I期临床试验的表现:过去两年中基于模型与基于规则的I期试验在分子靶向抗癌药物方面表现的定量比较。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2016 Jun;43(3):235-42. doi: 10.1007/s10928-016-9466-0. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Tearing down inequalities in the healthcare system across Europe: the BEACON project.消除欧洲医疗体系中的不平等现象:BEACON项目。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 5;13:1520772. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1520772. eCollection 2025.
2
Synthetic Data in Healthcare and Drug Development: Definitions, Regulatory Frameworks, Issues.医疗保健与药物研发中的合成数据:定义、监管框架、问题
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2025 May;14(5):840-852. doi: 10.1002/psp4.70021. Epub 2025 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Go/No-Go Decision-Making Properties Between Single Arm Phase II Trial Designs in Oncology.比较肿瘤学中单臂二期临床试验设计的 Go/No-Go 决策属性。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Mar;56(2):291-300. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00360-2. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Optimal one-stage design and analysis for efficacy expansion in Phase I oncology trials.I 期肿瘤学试验中疗效扩展的最优单阶段设计和分析。
Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;18(6):673-680. doi: 10.1177/17407745211052486. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
3
Data augmentation based on waterfall plots to increase value of response data generated by small single arm Phase II trials.
基于瀑布图的数据增强方法,提高小样本单臂 II 期临床试验应答数据的价值。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Nov;110:106589. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106589. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
4
Single-arm oncology trials and the nature of external controls arms.单臂肿瘤学试验和外部对照臂的性质。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Aug;10(12):1052-1066. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0003. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
5
Comparison of Duration of Response vs Conventional Response Rates and Progression-Free Survival as Efficacy End Points in Simulated Immuno-oncology Clinical Trials.比较免疫肿瘤学临床试验中反应持续时间与传统缓解率和无进展生存期作为疗效终点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218175. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8175.
6
Accounting for All Patients in Waterfall Plots.瀑布图中所有患者的统计分析。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Apr;5:414-420. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00150.
7
Implementing Historical Controls in Oncology Trials.在肿瘤学试验中实施历史对照。
Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):e859-e862. doi: 10.1002/onco.13696. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
A systematic review of meta-analyses assessing the validity of tumour response endpoints as surrogates for progression-free or overall survival in cancer.系统评价元分析评估肿瘤反应终点作为癌症无进展或总生存期替代终点的有效性。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Nov;123(11):1686-1696. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01050-w. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
Linking Tumor Growth Dynamics to Survival in Ipilimumab-Treated Patients With Advanced Melanoma Using Mixture Tumor Growth Dynamic Modeling.利用混合肿瘤生长动态模型将肿瘤生长动力学与接受伊匹单抗治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者的生存情况联系起来。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;8(11):825-834. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12454. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
10
From waterfall plots to spaghetti plots in early oncology clinical development.从瀑布图到早期肿瘤学临床开发中的意大利面条图。
Pharm Stat. 2019 Oct;18(5):526-532. doi: 10.1002/pst.1944. Epub 2019 Apr 3.