Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Aggress Behav. 2022 Jan;48(1):85-93. doi: 10.1002/ab.22001. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
In this study, prototypicality of the aggressor was tested as a group-level factor predicting social media users' active participation in cyberaggression. Participants were exposed to a fictitious conversation, in which either a prototypical versus non-prototypical user posted an aggressive comment as a reply to a provocative comment. In line with self-categorization theory, we hypothesized that bystander participants would post an aggressive comment and rate the aggression as acceptable to a greater extent in the prototypical than in the non-prototypical condition. Furthermore, we predicted that perceived normativity of aggression would mediate the effect of prototypicality. Results supported these predictions and showed that prototypical members affect the extent to which collective aggressive behaviors in online interactions are approved and enacted. These findings highlight the importance of group-level factors in the study of cyberaggression and provide important information for understanding the psychological underpinnings of collective forms of online aggression.
在这项研究中,攻击性的典型性被测试为一个群体水平的因素,预测社交媒体用户是否积极参与网络攻击。参与者被暴露在一个虚构的对话中,其中一个典型的用户与非典型的用户以回复挑衅性评论的方式发布了攻击性评论。根据自我分类理论,我们假设旁观者参与者会发布攻击性评论,并在典型条件下比非典型条件下更认为这种攻击是可以接受的。此外,我们还预测,攻击性的感知规范性将中介典型性的影响。结果支持了这些预测,并表明典型成员影响在线互动中集体攻击性行为得到认可和实施的程度。这些发现强调了群体水平因素在网络攻击研究中的重要性,并为理解集体形式的在线攻击的心理基础提供了重要信息。