Second Department of Medicine, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbruecken, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine III, Saarland University Hospital, University of the Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022 Mar;33(1):55-62. doi: 10.1007/s00399-021-00816-w. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
Previous studies established a role for the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) to effectively and safely bridge temporary risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with advanced heart failure. The prognostic relevance of the WCD remains controversial.
The authors investigated adherence to, as well as the safety and effectiveness of, WCD use in a real-world cohort of patients at high risk for SCD.
All consecutive patients (n = 83) receiving a WCD at a German tertiary care hospital between April 2012 and December 2019 were retrospectively included in this analysis. Patient characteristics were collected at the time of the index hospitalization. Using the Zoll® lifeVest® (ZOLL Medical Corporation, Chelmsford, MA, USA) network database, two separate investigators evaluated adherence to the WCD as well as arrhythmic events during WCD wear time.
During 3680 wearing days (mean WCD wear time, 44 days) with a median daily wear time of 23.1 h, three arrhythmic events of relevance (sustained ventricular tachycardia, VT) occurred, one of which was sufficiently terminated by WCD shock. Another patient died from sudden cardiac death while pausing his WCD. Right bundle branch block correlated significantly with sustained VT occurrence (r = 0.3315; 95% CI -0.1265 to 0.3014; p = 0.0022). In 30 patients (36.1%) a cardioverter/defibrillator was implanted.
In a real-life clinical setting, the use of WCD in patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death is effective and safe and adherence to the device is high. The event rate for VA was lower than in comparable patient cohorts. Adherence remains a crucial issue as one patient in the present series died while not wearing the device.
先前的研究已经确定,可穿戴式除颤器(WCD)在为患有晚期心力衰竭的患者有效和安全地桥接猝死(SCD)的临时风险方面发挥作用。WCD 的预后相关性仍存在争议。
作者研究了在高 SCD 风险的真实世界患者队列中,WCD 的使用依从性、安全性和有效性。
本研究回顾性纳入了 2012 年 4 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在德国一家三级护理医院接受 WCD 的所有连续患者(n=83)。在索引住院期间收集患者特征。使用 Zoll®lifeVest®(ZOLL Medical Corporation,马萨诸塞州切姆斯福德)网络数据库,两名独立研究者评估了 WCD 的佩戴依从性以及 WCD 佩戴期间的心律失常事件。
在 3680 个佩戴日(平均 WCD 佩戴时间 44 天)中,中位每日佩戴时间为 23.1 小时,发生了 3 次相关的心律失常事件(持续性室性心动过速,VT),其中 1 次被 WCD 电击充分终止。另一名患者在暂停使用 WCD 时死于心脏性猝死。右束支传导阻滞与持续性 VT 的发生显著相关(r=0.3315;95%CI-0.1265 至 0.3014;p=0.0022)。在 30 名患者(36.1%)中植入了心脏复律除颤器。
在真实临床环境中,高猝死风险患者使用 WCD 是有效且安全的,且对设备的依从性很高。VA 的发生率低于可比的患者队列。由于在本研究系列中,有 1 名患者在未佩戴设备的情况下死亡,因此依从性仍然是一个关键问题。