Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande - FURG, Av. Itália km 8 Bairro Carreiros, Rio Grande, RS, 96203-900, Brazil.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(47):67880-67885. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17142-w. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
Restriction measures against COVID-19 caused the environmental panorama of cities to change, especially in relation to air pollution. This scenario of severe reduction in the emission of air pollutants led to a flurry of studies about their behavior during the pandemic. The vast majority of studies pointed to a decrease in all pollutants, with the exception of ozone. However, was this highlighted ozone trend really the global trend? This discussion seeks to answer this question while addressing two major considerations that led to this trend: (1) the process of ozone formation and behavior and (2) the main reasons that led to the findings of this trend (region of the studies, meteorological conditions, and the time scale adopted for data collection). From our observations, we emphasize that a trend is not unanimity! The global trend turned out to be the opposite of what the initial studies showed, all this because the observed trend was a regional trend, affected by the reasons discussed. Thus, we raise awareness and concern with the way in which the initial "fever" of the behavior of air pollutants occurred and also toward the act of sampling highly populated areas, as this attitude could have caused biased estimations and disinformation.
由于新冠疫情的限制措施,城市的环境状况发生了变化,尤其是在空气污染方面。这种污染物排放量大幅减少的情况引发了大量研究,以了解它们在疫情期间的行为。绝大多数研究表明,所有污染物的排放量都有所下降,除了臭氧。然而,这种明显的臭氧增加趋势是否真的是全球性的趋势呢?本讨论旨在回答这个问题,同时探讨导致这种趋势的两个主要考虑因素:(1)臭氧形成和行为的过程,以及(2)导致这种趋势的主要原因(研究区域、气象条件和数据收集所采用的时间尺度)。根据我们的观察,我们强调,趋势并不是一致的!全球趋势与最初研究显示的结果恰恰相反,这一切都是因为所观察到的趋势是区域性的趋势,受到了所讨论的原因的影响。因此,我们对空气污染物行为的初始“热潮”以及对人口密集地区进行采样的行为表示关注,因为这种态度可能导致了有偏差的估计和虚假信息。