Tudor Cristiana
International Business and Economics Department, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania.
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 11;8(11):e11384. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11384. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Air pollution remains the most serious environmental health issue in the United Kingdom while also carrying non-trivial economic costs. The COVID-19 lockdown periods reduced anthropogenic emissions and offered unique conditions for air pollution research. This study sources fine-granularity geo-spatial air quality and meteorological data for the capital cities of two UK countries (i.e. England's capital London and Scotland's capital Edinburgh) from the UK Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN) spanning 2016-2022 to assess long-term trends in several criteria pollutants (PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, O3, and CO) and the changes in ozone pollution during the pandemic period. Unlike other studies conducted thus far, this research integrates several tools in trend estimation, including the Mann-Kendall test, the Theil-Sen estimator with bootstrap resampling, and the generalized additive model (GAM). Moreover, several investigations, including cluster trajectory analysis, pollution rose plots, and potential source contribution function (PSCF), are also employed to identify potential origin sources for air masses carrying precursors and estimate their contributions to ozone concentrations at receptor sites and downwind areas. The main findings reveal that most of the criteria pollutants show a decreasing trend in both geographies over the seven-year period, except for O3, which presents a significant ascending trend in London and a milder ascending trend in Edinburgh. However, O3 concentrations have significantly decreased during the year 2020 in both urban areas, despite registering sharp increases during the first lockdown period. In turn, these findings indicate on one hand that the O3 generation process is in the VOC-limited regime in both UK urban areas and, on the other hand, confirm previous findings that, when stretching the analysis period, diminishing ozone levels can lead to NOx reduction even in VOC-controlled geographies. Trajectory analysis reveals that northern Europe, particularly Norway and Sweden, is a principal ozone pollution source for Edinburgh, whereas, for London, mainland Europe (i.e., the Benelux countries) is another significant source. The results have important policy implications, revealing that effective and efficient NOx abatement measures spur ozone pollution in the short-term, but the increase can be transient. Moreover, policymakers in London and Edinburgh should consider that both local and transboundary sources contribute to local ozone pollution.
空气污染仍然是英国最严重的环境卫生问题,同时还带来了不可忽视的经济成本。新冠疫情封锁期减少了人为排放,为空气污染研究提供了独特条件。本研究从英国自动城乡网络(AURN)获取了2016年至2022年期间英国两个国家首都城市(即英格兰首都伦敦和苏格兰首都爱丁堡)的细粒度地理空间空气质量和气象数据,以评估几种标准污染物(PM10、PM2.5、SO2、NO2、O3和CO)的长期趋势以及疫情期间臭氧污染的变化。与迄今为止进行的其他研究不同,本研究在趋势估计中整合了多种工具,包括曼-肯德尔检验、带自助重采样的泰尔-森估计器以及广义相加模型(GAM)。此外,还采用了多项调查,包括聚类轨迹分析、污染玫瑰图和潜在源贡献函数(PSCF),以识别携带前体物质的气团的潜在源地,并估计它们对受体站点和下风向地区臭氧浓度的贡献。主要研究结果表明,在这七年期间,除了O3之外,大多数标准污染物在这两个地区都呈现出下降趋势,O3在伦敦呈现出显著的上升趋势,在爱丁堡呈现出较温和的上升趋势。然而,尽管在第一次封锁期间O3浓度急剧上升,但在2020年这两个城市地区的O3浓度都显著下降。反过来,这些研究结果一方面表明,在英国的两个城市地区,O3生成过程都处于挥发性有机化合物(VOC)限制状态,另一方面证实了先前的研究结果,即当延长分析期时,即使在VOC控制的地区,臭氧水平的降低也可能导致氮氧化物(NOx)的减少。轨迹分析表明,北欧,特别是挪威和瑞典,是爱丁堡的主要臭氧污染源,而对于伦敦来说,欧洲大陆(即比荷卢三国)是另一个重要污染源。这些结果具有重要的政策意义,表明有效且高效的NOx减排措施在短期内会刺激臭氧污染,但这种增加可能是短暂的。此外,伦敦和爱丁堡的政策制定者应考虑到本地和跨界污染源都会对本地臭氧污染产生影响。