• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领导者支配对员工零和思维及帮助行为的影响。

The impact of leader dominance on employees' zero-sum mindset and helping behavior.

机构信息

Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.

Department of Organisational Behaviour, London Business School.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2022 Oct;107(10):1706-1724. doi: 10.1037/apl0000980. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000980
PMID:34694835
Abstract

Leaders strive to encourage helping behaviors among employees, as it positively affects both organizational and team effectiveness. However, the manner in which a leader influences others can unintentionally limit this desired behavior. Drawing on social learning theory, we contend that a leader's tendency to influence others via dominance could decrease employees' interpersonal helping. Dominant leaders, who influence others by being assertive and competitive, shape their subordinates' cognitive schema of success based on zero-sum thinking. Employees with a zero-sum mindset are more likely to believe that they can only make progress at the expense of others. We further propose that this zero-sum mindset results in less interpersonal helping among subordinates. We test our hypotheses by employing different operationalizations of our key variables in eight studies of which four are reported in the manuscript and another four in Supplemental Information across a combined sample of 147,780 observations. These studies include a large archival study, experiments with both laboratory and online samples, and a time-lagged field study with employees from 50 different teams. Overall, this research highlights the unintended consequences that dominant leaders have on their followers' helping behavior by increasing their zero-sum mindset. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

领导者努力鼓励员工之间的帮助行为,因为这对组织和团队的效能都有积极影响。然而,领导者影响他人的方式可能会无意中限制这种期望的行为。本文以社会学习理论为基础,认为领导者通过支配倾向来影响他人的倾向可能会减少员工的人际帮助。支配型领导者通过自信和竞争来影响他人,根据零和思维塑造下属对成功的认知模式。具有零和思维的员工更有可能认为他们只能以牺牲他人为代价取得进步。我们进一步提出,这种零和思维会导致下属之间的人际帮助减少。我们通过在 8 项研究中使用我们的关键变量的不同操作化来检验我们的假设,其中 4 项在本文中报告,另外 4 项在补充信息中报告,总共有 147780 个观测值的综合样本。这些研究包括一项大型档案研究、一项有实验室和在线样本的实验,以及一项对来自 50 个不同团队的员工进行的时间滞后实地研究。总的来说,这项研究通过增加员工的零和思维,强调了支配型领导者对其下属帮助行为的意外后果。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
The impact of leader dominance on employees' zero-sum mindset and helping behavior.领导者支配对员工零和思维及帮助行为的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Oct;107(10):1706-1724. doi: 10.1037/apl0000980. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
2
When and Why Leaders' Helping Behavior Promotes Employees' Thriving: Exploring the Role of Voice Behavior and Perceived Leader's Role Overload.领导者的帮助行为何时以及为何能促进员工的茁壮成长:探究建言行为和感知到的领导者角色过载的作用
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:553512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.553512. eCollection 2020.
3
How responsible leadership shapes followers' low-carbon behavior: A dual-mediation model.负责任的领导如何塑造追随者的低碳行为:一个双重中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1086504. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1086504. eCollection 2022.
4
Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems.让领导心情不好:帮助下属解决个人问题的情感代价。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Apr;105(4):355-371. doi: 10.1037/apl0000450. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
5
Does Participative Leadership Matters in Employees' Outcomes During COVID-19? Role of Leader Behavioral Integrity.在新冠疫情期间,参与式领导对员工的工作成果有影响吗?领导者行为正直性的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 21;12:646442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646442. eCollection 2021.
6
How do leaders react when treated unfairly? Leader narcissism and self-interested behavior in response to unfair treatment.当领导者受到不公正待遇时,他们会如何反应?领导者自恋和自利行为对不公平待遇的反应。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Nov;102(11):1590-1599. doi: 10.1037/apl0000237. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
7
Narcissistic leaders: An asset or a liability? Leader visibility, follower responses, and group-level absenteeism.自恋型领导者:资产还是负债?领导者可见度、追随者反应和群体缺勤率。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Jul;103(7):703-723. doi: 10.1037/apl0000298. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
8
Leaders' ambition and followers' cheating behavior: The role of performance pressure and leader identification.领导者的抱负与追随者的欺骗行为:绩效压力和领导者认同的作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;14:982328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.982328. eCollection 2023.
9
Leader Humility, and Subordinates' Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Withdrawal Behavior: Exploring the Mediating Mechanisms of Subordinates' Psychological Capital.领导者谦逊与下属组织公民行为和退出行为:探究下属心理资本的中介机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 8;17(7):2544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072544.
10
The hidden dark side of empowering leadership: The moderating role of hindrance stressors in explaining when empowering employees can promote moral disengagement and unethical pro-organizational behavior.授权型领导的隐性阴暗面:阻碍压力源在解释何时授权员工会促进道德脱离和不道德的亲组织行为方面的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Dec;107(12):2220-2242. doi: 10.1037/apl0001013. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonzero-Sum Time Perception Is Associated with Greater Willingness to Help.非零和时间感知与更强的助人意愿相关。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 May 21;15(5):90. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15050090.
2
Zero-sum beliefs and the avoidance of political conversations.零和信念与避免政治对话。
Commun Psychol. 2024 May 16;2(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00095-4.
3
Students' School and Psychological Adjustment in Classrooms with Positive and Negative Leaders.学生在积极和消极领导者的课堂中的学校和心理调整。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Mar;53(3):550-562. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01937-w. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
4
How Bottom-Line Mentality Leads to Abusive Supervision? Investigating the Mediating Effects of Anxiety.底线思维如何导致滥用监管?探究焦虑的中介作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Nov 1;16:4431-4444. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S436568. eCollection 2023.
5
Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects.她的王冠更沉重:领导者情绪劳动的性别模式及其下游影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 29;13:849566. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849566. eCollection 2022.