Suppr超能文献

自我好与自我坏:自我启动引发积极和消极的内隐评价。

Me as good and me as bad: Priming the self triggers positive and negative implicit evaluations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan;122(1):106-134. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000332. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

Abstract

Although theories of personality and human behavior have long assumed that the self is affectively complex, widely used indirect measures of implicit self-evaluations have largely focused on the robustness and cultural universality of the self's positivity. Such indirect measures assess evaluations on a single continuum, ranging from positive to negative. Thus, they focus on the self's positivity and are inherently incapable of assessing whether the self is associated with good bad. Using the well-established evaluative priming task, the present work tested the hypothesis that positive implicit self-evaluations coexist with an inkling of negative implicit self-evaluations. Studies 1 and 2 empirically demonstrated that priming the self facilitated the classification of both positive negative targets (bivalent-priming). In contrast, replicating classic findings, priming a personally significant, liked object facilitated the classification of positive targets and inhibited the classification of negative targets (univalent-priming). Study 3 showed that the bivalent-priming triggered by self-primes cannot be explained by alternative accounts (e.g., arousal, vigilance). Meta-analyses of all studies attests to the robustness and reproducibility of self-primes triggering both positive negative implicit evaluations. Moreover, tests estimating heterogeneity in the strength of implicit self-evaluations indicated that individual differences in nonclinical, healthy individuals may be limited, possibly reflecting measurement limitations, the nature of implicit self-evaluations, or both. Overall, the present work shines a spotlight on a previously undocumented effect: Despite the self's robust net positivity, the self reliably triggers negative implicit self-evaluations. Implications for the conceptualization, assessment, and consequences of implicit self-evaluations are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

虽然人格和人类行为理论长期以来一直假设自我是情感复杂的,但广泛使用的内隐自我评价的间接测量方法主要集中在自我的积极性的稳健性和文化普遍性上。这些间接测量方法在单一连续体上评估评价,范围从积极到消极。因此,它们关注自我的积极性,并且固有地无法评估自我是否与好坏相关。本研究使用经过充分验证的评价启动任务,检验了这样一种假设,即积极的内隐自我评价与消极的内隐自我评价的暗示共存。研究 1 和 2 从经验上证明,启动自我有助于对积极和消极目标进行分类(双价启动)。相比之下,复制经典发现,启动一个个人重要且喜欢的对象促进了积极目标的分类,抑制了消极目标的分类(单一价启动)。研究 3 表明,自我启动引发的双价启动不能用替代解释(例如,唤醒、警惕)来解释。所有研究的元分析都证明了自我启动引发积极和消极内隐评价的稳健性和可重复性。此外,估计内隐自我评价强度的个体差异测试表明,非临床健康个体的个体差异可能有限,这可能反映了测量限制、内隐自我评价的性质,或者两者兼而有之。总的来说,本研究揭示了一个以前未被记录的效应:尽管自我具有强大的净积极性,但自我确实会引发消极的内隐自我评价。讨论了对内隐自我评价的概念化、评估和后果的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验