HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2022 Jan 5;53(1):1-16. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00026. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
Most speech-language pathologists (SLPs) working with children with developmental language disorder (DLD) do not perform language sample analysis (LSA) on a regular basis, although they do regard LSA as highly informative for goal setting and evaluating grammatical therapy. The primary aim of this study was to identify facilitators, barriers, and needs related to performing LSA by Dutch SLPs working with children with DLD. The secondary aim was to investigate whether a training would change the actual performance of LSA.
A focus group with 11 SLPs working in Dutch speech-language pathology practices was conducted. Barriers, facilitators, and needs were identified using thematic analysis and categorized using the theoretical domain framework. To address the barriers, a training was developed using software program CLAN. Changes in barriers and use of LSA were evaluated with a survey sent to participants before, directly after, and 3 months posttraining.
The barriers reported in the focus group were SLPs' lack of knowledge and skills, time investment, negative beliefs about their capabilities, differences in beliefs about their professional role, and no reimbursement from health insurance companies. Posttraining survey results revealed that LSA was not performed more often in daily practice. Using CLAN was not the solution according to participating SLPs. Time investment remained a huge barrier.
A training in performing LSA did not resolve the time investment barrier experienced by SLPs. User-friendly software, developed in codesign with SLPs might provide a solution. For the short-term, shorter samples, preferably from narrative tasks, should be considered.
大多数从事语言发育障碍(DLD)儿童工作的言语-语言病理学家(SLP)并不定期进行语言样本分析(LSA),尽管他们认为 LSA 对于设定目标和评估语法治疗非常有帮助。本研究的主要目的是确定荷兰语 SLP 在为 DLD 儿童进行 LSA 时的促进因素、障碍和需求。次要目的是调查培训是否会改变实际的 LSA 表现。
对 11 名在荷兰言语治疗实践中工作的 SLP 进行了焦点小组讨论。使用主题分析识别障碍、促进因素和需求,并使用理论领域框架对其进行分类。为了解决这些障碍,使用 CLAN 软件程序开发了培训。在培训前、培训后直接和培训后 3 个月向参与者发送调查,以评估障碍的变化和 LSA 的使用情况。
焦点小组中报告的障碍是 SLP 缺乏知识和技能、时间投入、对自己能力的负面信念、对其专业角色的信念差异以及保险公司不报销。培训后的调查结果显示,LSA 在日常实践中并没有更频繁地进行。根据参与的 SLP 的说法,使用 CLAN 并不是解决方案。时间投入仍然是一个巨大的障碍。
进行 LSA 的培训并没有解决 SLP 经历的时间投入障碍。用户友好的软件,与 SLP 共同设计开发,可能是一个解决方案。短期内,应该考虑较短的样本,最好来自叙事任务。