WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management, Burgplatz 2, 56179 Vallendar, Germany.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Dec;124:104096. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104096. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
Mothers in Germany are entitled to midwifery care; however, they face a lack of skilled professionals. While the reliability of the access to midwifery is of great public interest, we know little about clients' preferences.
We conduct a discrete choice experiment to study preferences and willingness to accept copayment for the entire scope of midwifery care (pregnancy, delivery, and postnatal). Thereby, we aim to provide policy recommendations for priority settings in times of scarcity. Furthermore, we evaluate to what extent midwives' education matters to parents and assess the degree of support for the latest Midwifery Reform Act that transfers education from vocational schools to universities.
Discrete choice experiment with separated adaptive dual response.
Online Survey promoted through Facebook to parents in Germany.
2080 respondents completed the experiment. They all have or are expecting at least one natural child, mainly born between 2018 and 2020 (87%). The average respondent is female (99%), 33 years old, with a university degree (50%).
We use a d-optimal fractional factorial design and obtain individual parameter estimates through a Multinomial Logit analysis with Hierarchical Bayes estimation techniques. We calculate willingness to pay and importance weights and simulate uptake probabilities for different packages of care. To avoid extreme choice behavior, we apply separated adaptive dual response.
Home visits during the postnatal phase are most important (importance weight 50%); online support is demanded when no personal support is available. We find that 1:1 care during delivery is highly preferred, but one midwife supporting two women intrapartum is still acceptable. The midwife´s education plays a minor role with an importance weight of 3%; however, we find a preference for midwives trained at vocational schools rather than at universities.
In times of scarcity, postnatal care in the form of home visits should be prioritized over pregnancy counseling, and online services should be promoted as an add-on but not as a substitute for personal support. There is a high level of willingness to accept co-financing to ensure the availability of services usually covered by health insurance.
德国的产妇有权享受助产士护理,但她们面临着专业人员短缺的问题。虽然获得助产士服务的可靠性是公众非常关心的问题,但我们对客户的偏好知之甚少。
我们进行了一项离散选择实验,以研究对整个助产服务范围(怀孕、分娩和产后)的支付意愿和可接受性。因此,我们旨在为资源稀缺时期的优先事项设定提供政策建议。此外,我们评估助产士教育对父母的重要程度,并评估将教育从职业学校转移到大学的最新助产改革法案的支持程度。
具有分离自适应双重响应的离散选择实验。
通过 Facebook 向德国的父母在线推广调查。
2080 名受访者完成了实验。他们都有或至少有一个自然分娩的孩子,主要出生于 2018 年至 2020 年之间(87%)。平均受访者为女性(99%),年龄 33 岁,拥有大学学历(50%)。
我们使用 d-最优分数阶设计,并通过分层贝叶斯估计技术的多项逻辑回归分析获得个体参数估计。我们计算支付意愿和重要性权重,并为不同的护理套餐模拟吸收率。为避免极端选择行为,我们应用分离自适应双重响应。
产后阶段的家访最重要(重要性权重 50%);当没有个人支持时,需要在线支持。我们发现分娩时 1:1 的护理非常受欢迎,但一名助产士在分娩时同时支持两名女性仍然可以接受。助产士的教育作用较小,重要性权重为 3%;然而,我们发现人们更喜欢在职业学校接受培训的助产士,而不是在大学接受培训的助产士。
在资源稀缺时期,应以家访的形式优先提供产后护理,而应推广在线服务作为附加服务,而不是作为个人支持的替代品。为确保通常由健康保险覆盖的服务的可用性,人们有很高的共同融资意愿。