Donaldson C, Hundley V, Mapp T
Health Economics Research Unit, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Birth. 1998 Mar;25(1):32-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00032.x.
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the use of "willingness to pay" as a measure of the benefits of intrapartum care.
A questionnaire was mailed to 150 pregnant women booking at Aberdeen Maternity Hospital in the northeast of Scotland, giving information on options for intrapartum care compiled from a recent randomized trial of care in a midwife-managed delivery unit versus care in a consultant-led labor ward. Women were asked which type of care they preferred and what would be their maximum willingness to pay for their preferred option. Data were also collected on demographic and clinical characteristics.
Most women (55%) expressed a preference for care in a midwives unit. However, strength of preference, as reflected in willingness to pay, was greater among those in the smaller group, who expressed a preference for care in a consultant-led labor ward. The willingness-to-pay results were not associated with ability to pay.
These data should be used together with cost data to decide on provision of care. Given the strength of preference of the minority group, and if the cost implications are not too great, a flexible service that takes account of women's wishes should be provided, even if this goes against the trend for care of those at low risk. By analyzing choice of care by income groups and social class groupings, it is possible to examine whether willingness-to-pay results are associated with indicators of ability to pay. In this case, they were not. Willingness to pay has an advantage in allowing respondents to account for more than just health gain when valuing different types of care.
本研究旨在评估使用“支付意愿”作为衡量产时护理效益的可行性。
向在苏格兰东北部阿伯丁妇产医院预约的150名孕妇邮寄了一份问卷,问卷提供了从最近一项关于助产士管理的分娩单元护理与顾问主导的产房产护理的随机试验中汇编的产时护理选项信息。询问女性她们更喜欢哪种护理类型以及她们为首选选项愿意支付的最高金额。还收集了人口统计学和临床特征数据。
大多数女性(55%)表示更喜欢在助产士单元接受护理。然而,在较小的群体中,即那些表示更喜欢在顾问主导的产房产接受护理的人中,以支付意愿反映的偏好强度更大。支付意愿结果与支付能力无关。
这些数据应与成本数据一起用于决定护理的提供。鉴于少数群体的偏好强度,并且如果成本影响不是太大,应提供一种考虑到女性意愿的灵活服务,即使这与低风险人群护理的趋势相悖。通过按收入群体和社会阶层分组分析护理选择,可以研究支付意愿结果是否与支付能力指标相关。在这种情况下,它们不相关。支付意愿的一个优势在于,在评估不同类型的护理时,它允许受访者考虑的不仅仅是健康收益。