Suppr超能文献

LDI 之谜第二部分:深度不确定烧伤,人为还是机器?

The LDI Enigma Part II: Indeterminate depth burns, man or machine?

机构信息

Burn Center, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium; Department of Plastic Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.

Burn Center, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium; Department of Plastic Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Burns. 2021 Dec;47(8):1773-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laser Doppler imaging is universally considered the most evidence-based method for objective burn depth assessment by accurately predicting burn wound healing potential. This study has analyzed how exactly laser Doppler imaging measurements can be useful in the early therapeutic decision making for patients with clinically indeterminate depth burns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An extensive survey, by questionnaire and in-depth interviews, was conducted among 51 burn centers worldwide to gain insight on the practical use of laser Doppler imaging.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (53%) of the 51 burn centers contacted almost completely answered the 32 questions. Fifty-two percent of these centers (14/27) had at least 10 years of laser Doppler imaging experience. laser Doppler imaging was considered to be mainly or almost completely accurate by 89%. In case of discrepancy between clinical assessment and LDI, 41% relied more on clinical diagnosis, 25% delayed decision to operate, while 16% re-scanned the next day. The centers most experienced with laser Doppler imaging (13%) relied on it more. Final decisions for treatment were based on the combination of laser Doppler imaging and clinical assessment by 74%. Seventy percent of the centers almost never operated burns with laser Doppler imaging-red and would almost always operate burns with LDI-blue. Treatment decisions for intermediate laser Doppler imaging colors (pink, yellow and green) varied, with 76% basing decisions on other factors: % Total Body Surface Area (TBSA), general health, age, location of the burn, potential for colonization/infection, patient preference, compliance with aftercare, logistics, and socio-economic factors.

CONCLUSION

Laser Doppler imaging reduces the number of clinical indeterminate depth burns. For these intermediate depth burns on laser Doppler imaging, treatment decisions are based on a combination of interpretation ('man') and laser Doppler imaging measurements ('machine'). Thorough knowledge of confounding factors and validated laser Doppler imaging color code, consideration of surrounding laser Doppler imaging colors, the use of mean flux values, and not directly burn related factors are essential. Burn centers with most laser Doppler imaging experience considered laser Doppler imaging an indispensable diagnostic tool.

摘要

简介

激光多普勒成像被普遍认为是最具循证医学证据的客观评估烧伤深度的方法,它可以准确预测创面愈合潜能。本研究分析了激光多普勒成像测量在临床深度不确定烧伤的早期治疗决策中究竟如何发挥作用。

材料和方法

通过问卷和深入访谈,对全球 51 个烧伤中心进行了广泛调查,以了解激光多普勒成像的实际应用。

结果

联系的 51 个烧伤中心中有 27 个(53%)几乎完整地回答了 32 个问题。这些中心中有 52%(14/27)有至少 10 年的激光多普勒成像经验。89%的中心认为激光多普勒成像主要或几乎完全准确。如果临床评估与 LDI 之间存在差异,41%的中心更多地依赖临床诊断,25%的中心延迟手术决策,而 16%的中心则在第二天重新扫描。经验更丰富的中心(13%)更依赖于 LDI。74%的中心最终根据激光多普勒成像和临床评估的综合结果决定治疗。70%的中心几乎不会对激光多普勒成像红色的烧伤进行手术,几乎总会对激光多普勒成像蓝色的烧伤进行手术。对于中间激光多普勒成像颜色(粉红色、黄色和绿色)的烧伤,治疗决策因其他因素而异,76%的中心根据以下因素做出决策:烧伤的总体表面积(TBSA)%、总体健康状况、年龄、烧伤位置、潜在的定植/感染、患者偏好、对后续治疗的依从性、后勤保障以及社会经济因素。

结论

激光多普勒成像减少了临床深度不确定烧伤的数量。对于激光多普勒成像中的这些中间深度烧伤,治疗决策基于解释(“人”)和激光多普勒成像测量(“机器”)的综合结果。彻底了解混杂因素和经过验证的激光多普勒成像颜色编码,考虑周围的激光多普勒成像颜色、使用平均通量值以及与烧伤直接相关的因素并非必要因素。具有丰富激光多普勒成像经验的烧伤中心认为激光多普勒成像为不可或缺的诊断工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验