Suppr超能文献

“不含烟草的尼古丁”宣称对非烟草使用的年轻成年人使用 Puff Bar 电子烟的意图和看法的影响。

Effect of a 'tobacco-free nicotine' claim on intentions and perceptions of Puff Bar e-cigarette use among non-tobacco-using young adults.

机构信息

Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2023 Jul;32(4):501-504. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056957. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Puff Bar disposable e-cigarettes are now marketed with a 'tobacco-free nicotine' claim. We assessed the effect of this claim on non-tobacco-using young adults' perceptions of and intentions of using Puff Bar.

METHODS

We conducted an online randomised between-subjects experiment among non-tobacco-using young adults (ages 18-29 years; n=1822). Participants viewed depictions of Puff Bar e-cigarettes with the claim that the product contains 'tobacco-free nicotine' (experimental group; n=909) or simply 'nicotine' (control group; n=913). Multivariable regressions were used to assess the associations between experimental conditions and Puff Bar use intentions, harm perceptions, use expectancies and perceived relative use of Puff Bar versus other e-cigarettes, controlling for participant characteristics.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the experimental group who saw the 'tobacco-free nicotine' claim reported higher intentions of using Puff Bar (coefficient=0.17, p<0.001). The experimental group had a lower likelihood of perceiving Puff Bar use as 'extremely or very harmful' (OR=0.63, p<0.001) and 'strongly or somewhat' agreeing with the negative expectancy of using Puff Bar (OR=0.67, p<0.001). Additionally, the experimental group reported being 'much more or more likely' to use Puff Bar over other e-cigarettes (OR=1.67, p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

Puff Bar's tobacco-free nicotine claim may increase non-tobacco-using young adults' intentions of using Puff Bar and reduce harm perceptions and negative expectancy towards using Puff Bar. The claim may also prompt the use of Puff Bar over other e-cigarette brands and types. These findings are concerning given the health effects and regulations for tobacco-free nicotine products are not immediately clear.

摘要

简介

现在,Puff Bar 一次性电子烟以“不含烟草的尼古丁”为卖点进行营销。我们评估了这一说法对不使用烟草的年轻成年人对 Puff Bar 的看法和使用意图的影响。

方法

我们在不使用烟草的年轻成年人(18-29 岁;n=1822)中进行了一项在线随机分组实验。参与者观看了含有“不含烟草的尼古丁”(实验组;n=909)或仅含“尼古丁”(对照组;n=913)的 Puff Bar 电子烟描述。多变量回归用于评估实验条件与 Puff Bar 使用意图、危害认知、使用预期和感知相对使用 Puff Bar 与其他电子烟之间的关联,同时控制参与者的特征。

结果

与对照组相比,看到“不含烟草的尼古丁”这一说法的实验组报告称,他们使用 Puff Bar 的意图更高(系数=0.17,p<0.001)。实验组认为使用 Puff Bar 是“非常或非常有害”(OR=0.63,p<0.001)和“强烈或有些”同意使用 Puff Bar 的负面预期(OR=0.67,p<0.001)的可能性较低。此外,实验组报告称,他们“更有可能或更有可能”使用 Puff Bar 而不是其他电子烟(OR=1.67,p<0.001)。

讨论

Puff Bar 的不含烟草的尼古丁说法可能会增加不使用烟草的年轻成年人使用 Puff Bar 的意图,并降低他们对使用 Puff Bar 的危害认知和负面预期。该说法还可能促使他们使用 Puff Bar 而不是其他电子烟品牌和类型。鉴于烟草中不含尼古丁产品的健康影响和法规尚不清楚,这些发现令人担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验