Suppr超能文献

紫杉醇和顺铂/卡铂联合氟尿嘧啶在食管癌同期放化疗中的应用。

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Department of Division of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):3391-3399. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12638.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cisplatin with 5-fluouracil (Cis/5Fu) and paclitaxel with carboplatin (Pac/Car) are common regimens used in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). Here, we aimed to compare the survival outcomes and treatment-related toxicities between these regimens in neoadjuvant CCRT in patients with locally advanced EC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty-six patients with locally advanced EC (98% squamous cell carcinoma) were prospectively recruited between 2016 and 2017 in a non-randomized manner. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the chemotherapeutic agents administered (Pac/Car group, n=87; Cis/5Fu group, n=47) in CCRT to compare the survival outcome and severe adverse event (sAE) incidence.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (85.7%) and 80 patients (91.4%) in the Cis/5Fu and Pac/Car groups completed pre-planned CCRT (p=0.26), respectively. The Cis/5Fu group presented a higher incidence of non-hematological sAE than the Pac/Car group (69.45% vs. 51.7%, p=0.049). Patients in the Pac/Car group showed a higher rate of surgical resection than those in the Cis/5Fu group (49.4% vs. 22.4%, p<0.001). After a median follow-up duration of 22.0 months (range=1.9-31.8), the 2-year survival rate was 56.9% for patients in the Pac/Car group and 28.7% for the Cis/5Fu group. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival was 0.45 (95%CI=0.28-0.72, p=0.001) in the comparison between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Overall, neoadjuvant CCRT with Pac/Car is associated with a better survival outcome, higher surgical resection rate, and better safety profiles than Cis/5Fu in patients with locally advanced EC.

摘要

背景/目的:顺铂联合氟尿嘧啶(Cis/5Fu)和紫杉醇联合卡铂(Pac/Car)是局部晚期食管癌(EC)患者同步放化疗(CCRT)中常用的方案。在此,我们旨在比较这两种方案在局部晚期 EC 新辅助 CCRT 中的生存结局和治疗相关毒性。

方法

2016 年至 2017 年,我们以非随机的方式前瞻性招募了 136 名局部晚期 EC(98%为鳞状细胞癌)患者。根据 CCRT 中使用的化疗药物(Pac/Car 组,n=87;Cis/5Fu 组,n=47)将患者分为两组,以比较生存结局和严重不良事件(sAE)发生率。

结果

Cis/5Fu 组和 Pac/Car 组分别有 42 例(85.7%)和 80 例(91.4%)患者完成了计划的 CCRT(p=0.26)。Cis/5Fu 组非血液学 sAE 的发生率高于 Pac/Car 组(69.45% vs. 51.7%,p=0.049)。Pac/Car 组患者的手术切除率高于 Cis/5Fu 组(49.4% vs. 22.4%,p<0.001)。中位随访时间为 22.0 个月(范围为 1.9-31.8)后,Pac/Car 组患者的 2 年生存率为 56.9%,Cis/5Fu 组为 28.7%。两组之间的总生存的风险比(HR)为 0.45(95%CI=0.28-0.72,p=0.001)。

结论

总体而言,与 Cis/5Fu 相比,新辅助 CCRT 中使用 Pac/Car 可使局部晚期 EC 患者的生存结局更好,手术切除率更高,安全性更好。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The American Cancer Society's Facts & Figures: 2020 Edition.美国癌症协会《2020年事实与数据》版
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2020 Mar;11(2):135-136. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2020.11.2.1. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
3
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.微创食管切除术。
Dig Surg. 2020;37(2):93-100. doi: 10.1159/000497456. Epub 2019 May 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验