Bufe Sam, Roll Stephen, Kondratjeva Olga, Skees Stephanie, Grinstein-Weiss Michal
Social Policy Institute, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Soc Indic Res. 2022;161(1):379-407. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02828-y. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
Households in the U.S. regularly experience unexpected negative income or expense shocks, and low- and moderate-income households experience these shocks at disproportionately high rates. Relatively little is known about the impact these shocks have on households' subjective sense of financial well-being, and how access to different types of liquidity (e.g., liquid assets, credit cards, social resources, and income flows) can mitigate the impact of these shocks on subjective financial well-being. To address these gaps in the literature, this paper uses data from a two-wave survey administered to 3,911 low- and moderate-income tax filers in 2018. Applying a difference-in-difference analysis, we find that the experience of an income shock between survey waves was associated with a large decline in subjective financial well-being, while the experience of an expense shock was associated with a more modest decline. Relatively liquidity-constrained households tended to be more negatively impacted by shocks than their counterparts, though not all sources of liquidity were equally as effective in buffering households against shocks. The findings of this paper point to the need for policymakers and program administrators to develop tools that can facilitate access to different types of liquidity to offset different financial risks for households.
美国家庭经常遭遇意外的负收入或支出冲击,而低收入和中等收入家庭遭受这些冲击的比例尤其高。对于这些冲击如何影响家庭的主观财务幸福感,以及获得不同类型的流动性(如流动资产、信用卡、社会资源和收入流)如何减轻这些冲击对主观财务幸福感的影响,我们所知甚少。为了填补文献中的这些空白,本文使用了2018年对3911名低收入和中等收入纳税申报人进行的两波调查数据。通过应用差分分析,我们发现,在调查波次之间经历收入冲击与主观财务幸福感大幅下降有关,而经历支出冲击则与较为适度的下降有关。相对受流动性约束的家庭往往比其他家庭更容易受到冲击的负面影响,不过并非所有流动性来源在缓冲家庭冲击方面都同样有效。本文的研究结果表明,政策制定者和项目管理者需要开发工具,以促进家庭获得不同类型的流动性,从而抵消不同的财务风险。