Suppr超能文献

系统性硬化症的肺部超声 B 线:间质性肺病筛查的截断值和方法学建议。

Lung ultrasound B-lines in systemic sclerosis: cut-off values and methodological indications for interstitial lung disease screening.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council.

Second Radiology Unit, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Apr 18;61(SI):SI56-SI64. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab801.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Lung ultrasound (LUS), through assessment of B-lines and pleural line alterations, is able to evaluate interstitial lung disease (ILD), a frequent complication of SSc. Different scanning schemes and counting methods have been proposed but no clear cut-off values have been indicated for screening. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different LUS methodological approaches to detect ILD compared with high-resolution CT (HRCT) as the gold standard.

METHODS

Sixty-nine SSc patients underwent LUS and chest HRCT on the same day. Both exams were scored by expert readers. The accuracy of different scanning schemes and counting methods was assessed and clinical and functional data were compared with imaging findings.

RESULTS

B-lines were more numerous in patients with the diffuse skin subset and Scl70 autoantibody positivity. The number of B-lines correlated with the Scleroderma Lung Study (SLS) I HRCT score (R = 0.754, P < 0.0001). A total of >10 B-lines on the whole chest or >1 B-line on the postero-basal chest showed 97% sensitivity for detecting even very early ILD signs (corresponding to an SLS I score of 1). Sensitivity increased to 100% when pleural line alterations were included in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS has a very high sensitivity in detecting SSc-related ILD. A cut-off value of >10 B-lines on the whole chest or >1 B-line on the postero-basal chest can be used for the screening of SSc-ILD. Assessing only the postero-basal chest seems to be mostly effective, combining high sensitivity with a less time-consuming approach.

摘要

目的

通过评估 B 线和胸膜线改变,肺部超声(LUS)能够评估间质性肺病(ILD),这是 SSc 的常见并发症。已经提出了不同的扫描方案和计数方法,但尚未确定用于筛查的明确截止值。我们旨在评估与高分辨率 CT(HRCT)作为金标准相比,不同 LUS 方法学方法检测 ILD 的准确性。

方法

69 例 SSc 患者在同一天接受 LUS 和胸部 HRCT 检查。由专家读者对这两项检查进行评分。评估了不同扫描方案和计数方法的准确性,并比较了临床和功能数据与影像学发现。

结果

弥漫性皮肤亚型和 Scl70 自身抗体阳性的患者 B 线更多。B 线数量与硬皮病肺研究(SLS)I HRCT 评分相关(R=0.754,P<0.0001)。整个胸部有>10 条 B 线或后基底胸部有>1 条 B 线可检测到早期 ILD 征象(对应 SLS I 评分 1),具有 97%的敏感性。当胸膜线改变包括在分析中时,敏感性增加到 100%。

结论

LUS 对检测 SSc 相关的 ILD 具有非常高的敏感性。整个胸部有>10 条 B 线或后基底胸部有>1 条 B 线的截止值可用于 SSc-ILD 的筛查。仅评估后基底胸部似乎最有效,结合高敏感性和耗时较少的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验