• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门内括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:影响功能结局和生存率的参数。

Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Parameters Affecting Functional Outcomes and Survival Rates.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery Maslak Acibadem Hospital Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of General Surgery Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Surg Technol Int. 2021 Oct 26;39:166-172. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.39.CR1460.

DOI:10.52198/21.STI.39.CR1460
PMID:34699602
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The development of new surgical techniques and devices, as well as the improvements in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy enabled intersphincteric resection (ISR), has reduced permanent colostomy usage. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term oncological and functional outcomes of patients who underwent partial ISR for rectal cancer located less than 5cm from the anal verge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 106 consecutive patients with very low rectal cancer underwent curative partial ISR from January 2006 to September 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. One-hundred-three (97%) of 106 patients received neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence (LR) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The Wexner incontinence score and Kirwan classification were used to evaluate patients' functional results.

RESULTS

The median follow up was 60 months (range, 18-174). The estimated five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 89% and 81.6%, respectively. Five-year local recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 6.6% and 10.4%, respectively. There was no in-hospital and 30-day mortality. The median Wexner score was 9 (range, 0-20) for 72 patients. Age (<65 years, p=0.027) and gender (male, p=0.019) had a positive effect on functional outcomes after surgery. One and five years colostomy-free survival rates were 96% and 89%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intersphincteric resection techniques are feasible for patients with very low rectal cancer, providing good oncological and functional outcomes.

摘要

简介

新的手术技术和设备的发展,以及新辅助放化疗的改进,使得经肛门内括约肌切除术(ISR)得以实现,从而降低了永久性结肠造口术的使用。本研究旨在评估距肛缘小于 5cm 的低位直肠癌患者接受部分 ISR 的长期肿瘤学和功能结局。

材料和方法

回顾性评估了 2006 年 1 月至 2019 年 9 月期间,106 例连续接受低位直肠癌根治性部分 ISR 的患者。106 例患者中有 103 例(97%)接受了新辅助化疗放疗。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法计算总生存(OS)、无病生存(DFS)和局部复发(LR)率。采用 Wexner 失禁评分和 Kirwan 分类评估患者的功能结果。

结果

中位随访时间为 60 个月(范围 18-174)。估计 5 年总生存率和无病生存率分别为 89%和 81.6%。5 年局部复发和远处转移率分别为 6.6%和 10.4%。无院内和 30 天死亡率。72 例患者的中位 Wexner 评分是 9 分(范围 0-20)。年龄(<65 岁,p=0.027)和性别(男性,p=0.019)对术后功能结果有积极影响。1 年和 5 年无结肠造口术生存率分别为 96%和 89%。

结论

肛门内括约肌切除术技术适用于低位直肠癌患者,可提供良好的肿瘤学和功能结局。

相似文献

1
Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Parameters Affecting Functional Outcomes and Survival Rates.经肛门内括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:影响功能结局和生存率的参数。
Surg Technol Int. 2021 Oct 26;39:166-172. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.39.CR1460.
2
[Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].[腹腔镜下低位直肠癌部分、次全及全括约肌间切除术的肿瘤学结局与肛门功能比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 25;20(8):904-909.
3
Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的长期结果
Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):916-21; discussion 921-2. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c29ff.
4
[Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].[机器人辅助低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的技术特点及临床疗效分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1137-1143. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.008.
5
Analysis of the clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.分析低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术(ISR)后肛门功能相关的临床因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan 28;11:24. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-24.
6
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.经肛门入路机器人辅助吻合术联合或不联合经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:先经肛门入路,再行机器人手术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
7
Long-term results of extended intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a retrospective study.超低位直肠癌扩大括约肌间切除术的长期结果:一项回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2016 Apr 18;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0133-6.
8
Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.视频:经肛门内括约肌间切除术的腹腔镜入路优势。
Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1661-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1451-x. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
9
Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?腹腔镜低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术的临床及功能结果:三种手工缝合结肠肛管吻合术之间有区别吗?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Apr;32(4):587-590. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2724-1. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
10
[Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].[腹腔镜低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术后结肠肛管吻合口狭窄的危险因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;22(8):755-761. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.08.010.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel technique for low-rectal cancer: Pushing the anus in laparoscopic radical resection.一种治疗低位直肠癌的新技术:腹腔镜根治性切除术中的肛门内推法
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 4;104(27):e43267. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043267.
2
Comparison of side-to-side anastomosis vs. end-to-end anastomosis in NOSES operation for left colon cancer: a retrospective study.NOSES手术中左结肠癌侧侧吻合与端端吻合的比较:一项回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 7;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02837-5.
3
The prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in colorectal cancer and colorectal anastomotic leakage patients: a retrospective study.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在结直肠癌及结直肠吻合口漏患者中的预后价值:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02708-5.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes.机器人手术与腹腔镜括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌患者的短期疗效
J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jan 1;21(1):60-65. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_320_23. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
5
Robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study on surgical safety and functional outcomes.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:手术安全性和功能结局的比较研究
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Jan-Feb;95(1-2):156-162. doi: 10.1111/ans.19302. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
6
Analysis of the correlation between defunctioning stoma and postoperative low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.分析直肠癌预防性造口与术后低位前切除综合征的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03452-z.
7
Comparing total mesorectal excision with partial mesorectal excision for proximal rectal cancer: evaluating postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes.比较全直肠系膜切除术与部分直肠系膜切除术治疗近端直肠癌:评估术后和长期肿瘤学结果。
Updates Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):1279-1287. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01926-z. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
8
Determining the optimal distal resection margin in rectal cancer patients by imaging of large pathological sections: An experimental study.通过大病理切片的影像学检查确定直肠癌患者的最佳远端切缘:一项实验研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 24;103(21):e38083. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038083.
9
Robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-saving resections have similar peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes in female patients with rectal cancer.在女性直肠癌患者中,机器人手术和腹腔镜保肛切除术在围手术期、肿瘤学及功能方面的结果相似。
Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2201-2209. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01686-2. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
10
Efficacy of intraoperative fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green-containing gauze in identifying the appropriate dissection layer in laparoscopic intersphincteric resection: A case report.术中使用含吲哚菁绿纱布进行荧光成像在腹腔镜括约肌间切除术中识别合适解剖层面的疗效:一例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2022 Oct 20;10(10):e6356. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6356. eCollection 2022 Oct.