Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Finnöy J P, Wisth P J, Böe O E

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 1987 Feb;9(1):68-78. doi: 10.1093/ejo/9.1.68.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/9.1.68

PMID:3470187

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment.

Eur J Orthod. 1987 Feb;9(1):68-78. doi: 10.1093/ejo/9.1.68.

The non-extraction approach to the treatment of Class II malocclusions: diagnosis and treatment planning.

N Z Dent J. 1982 Apr;78(352):41-51.

Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction.

Am J Orthod. 1982 Nov;82(5):384-91. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90187-7.

The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile.

Am J Orthod. 1986 Jun;89(6):507-17. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90009-6.

Anterior vertical changes in function regulator therapy.

Eur J Orthod. 1983 Aug;5(3):219-23. doi: 10.1093/ejo/5.3.219.

A study on the effects of treatment for upper protrusion in adult females by the edgewise method.

J Nihon Univ Sch Dent. 1983 Sep;25(3):183-99. doi: 10.2334/josnusd1959.25.183.

Class II, division 2 malocclusion. To extract--or not extract?

Angle Orthod. 1984 Apr;54(2):123-38. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1984)054<0123:CIDM>2.0.CO;2.

Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns.

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04512-2.

Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987 May;91(5):385-94. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90391-x.

Class II division I. A case report.

J Charles H. Tweed Int Found. 1982 Apr;10:59-74.

引用本文的文献

Relationship of Nasolabial Angle with Maxillary Incisor Proclination and Upper Lip Thickness in North Indian Population.

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):489-492. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2432.

Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities.

Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):50-9. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.050-059.oar.

Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy--a retrospective cohort study.

Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):865-74. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1574-5. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

Comparative assessment of soft-tissue changes in Class II Division 1 patients following extraction and non-extraction treatment.

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Nov;10(6):764-71.

Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients.

Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Apr;4(2):206-12. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.114886.

The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions.

Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):209-17. doi: 10.2319/051911-339.1. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

Mini-implants vs fixed functional appliances for treatment of young adult Class II female patients: a prospective clinical trial.

Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):294-303. doi: 10.2319/042811-302.1. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

The effect of premolar extractions on incisor position and soft tissue profile in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion.

J Orofac Orthop. 2009 Mar;70(2):128-38. doi: 10.1007/s00056-009-0813-2. Epub 2009 Mar 26.

Facial profile and dental changes before, during and after treatment with Hansaplate/Headgear.

J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(1):34-44. doi: 10.1007/BF02340930.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验