• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对安氏II类1分类患者拔牙和非拔牙治疗后软组织变化的比较评估。

Comparative assessment of soft-tissue changes in Class II Division 1 patients following extraction and non-extraction treatment.

作者信息

Verma Sneh Lata, Sharma Vijay Prakash, Singh Gyan Prakash, Sachan Kiran

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, B.B.D. College of Dental Sciences, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Orthodontics, Chandra Dental College and Hospital, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Nov;10(6):764-71.

PMID:24379865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3872628/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The extraction of teeth for orthodontic purpose has always been a controversial subject in the speciality. The aesthetics impact of the soft-tissue profile might play a key role in deciding on premolar extraction or non-extraction (NE) treatment, particularly in borderline patients. The purpose of this cephalometric study was to examine the soft-tissue treatment effects of Class II Division 1 malocclusion undergoing extraction of all first premolars in comparison with patients undergoing treatment with a NE approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hundred post-pubertal female patients of Class II Division 1 malocclusion were selected. Group 1, treated with four first premolar extractions, consisted of 50 female patients with a mean age of 14 years 1 month. Group 2, treated without extractions, consisted of 50 patients with a mean age of 13 years 5 months. Pre-treatment and post-treatment lateral cephalograms of the patients were obtained. The pre-treatment and post-treatment stage comparison and the intergroup comparison of the treatment changes were conducted between extraction and NE groups of Class II malocclusion samples with t tests. The levels of significance tested were P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.

RESULTS

The main soft-tissue differences between the groups at the end of treatment were a more retruded lower lip and a more pronounced lower labial sulcus in those patients subjected to extraction.

CONCLUSION

In Class II Division 1 patients, the extraction or NE decision, if based on sound diagnostic criteria, seems to have no systematic detrimental effects on the facial profile.

摘要

背景

出于正畸目的拔牙在该专业领域一直是一个有争议的话题。软组织侧貌的美学影响可能在决定拔除前磨牙或不拔牙(NE)治疗中起关键作用,尤其是在临界病例中。这项头影测量研究的目的是比较拔除所有第一前磨牙的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者与采用不拔牙方法治疗的患者的软组织治疗效果。

材料与方法

选取100名青春期后安氏II类1分类错牙合的女性患者。第1组为拔除四颗第一前磨牙进行治疗,由50名平均年龄为14岁1个月的女性患者组成。第2组为不拔牙治疗,由50名平均年龄为13岁5个月的患者组成。获取患者治疗前和治疗后的头颅侧位片。采用t检验对安氏II类错牙合样本的拔牙组和不拔牙组进行治疗前和治疗后阶段比较以及治疗变化的组间比较。检验的显著性水平为P < 0.05和P < 0.01。

结果

治疗结束时两组之间主要的软组织差异在于拔牙患者的下唇更后缩,下唇唇沟更明显。

结论

在安氏II类1分类患者中,如果基于合理的诊断标准做出拔牙或不拔牙的决定,似乎对面部侧貌没有系统性的不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/9c24a209f2b0/DRJ-10-764-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/f37089441903/DRJ-10-764-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/e080216f65cf/DRJ-10-764-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/d7803e8cd5f8/DRJ-10-764-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/a7dc329e0cfc/DRJ-10-764-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/7d410c2b0e59/DRJ-10-764-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/9c24a209f2b0/DRJ-10-764-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/f37089441903/DRJ-10-764-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/e080216f65cf/DRJ-10-764-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/d7803e8cd5f8/DRJ-10-764-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/a7dc329e0cfc/DRJ-10-764-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/7d410c2b0e59/DRJ-10-764-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84cb/3872628/9c24a209f2b0/DRJ-10-764-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative assessment of soft-tissue changes in Class II Division 1 patients following extraction and non-extraction treatment.对安氏II类1分类患者拔牙和非拔牙治疗后软组织变化的比较评估。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Nov;10(6):764-71.
2
Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients.安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形患者拔牙与非拔牙正畸治疗后的美学效果比较。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Apr;4(2):206-12. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.114886.
3
Soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with extractions: a systematic review.拔牙治疗的安氏II类错颌患者的软组织变化:一项系统评价
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Dec;38(6):631-637. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv083. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
4
Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形患者正畸治疗后影响软组织侧貌变化的因素
Prog Orthod. 2016;17:13. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0125-1. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
Soft tissue treatment changes with fixed functional appliances and with maxillary premolar extraction in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients.在安氏II类1分类错颌畸形患者中,软组织治疗随固定功能矫治器及上颌第一前磨牙拔除而发生变化。
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):214-222. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx053.
6
Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions.正畸治疗后拔牙与不拔牙情况下面部轮廓变化的比较。
Br J Orthod. 1997 Feb;24(1):25-34. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.1.25.
7
Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.各类治疗方式用于矫治骨性安氏II类错牙合畸形后影响软组织侧貌变化的因素:一项横断面研究
Int Orthod. 2019 Sep;17(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
8
Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols.骨性牙颌与软组织变化在伴有非对称拔牙方案的 II 类分牙治疗中的体现。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 4;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0193-x.
9
[The effectiveness of asymmetric extraction in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions].[非对称拔牙矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)的疗效]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2010 Aug;19(4):359-65.
10
Lip profile changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion of varied growth patterns treated with maxillary premolar extractions: A pilot study.不同生长型安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)患者上颌双尖牙拔除后唇型变化的初步研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Nov;158(5):684-693. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.09.024. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficacy of the RME II System Compared with the Sander Bite-Jumping Appliance: A Retrospective Study.RME II系统与桑德咬合跳跃矫治器疗效的对比:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 May 25;14(11):3700. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113700.
2
Hard and soft tissue shape variation and changes in Class II division 1 malocclusion during orthodontic treatment: a geometric morphometric analysis.正畸治疗中 II 类 1 分类错颌的硬组织和软组织形态变化及变化:几何形态测量分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 27;23(1):931. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03684-7.
3
Spontaneous eruption of maxillary third molars in the adult patient undergoing orthodontic treatment after first molar extractions.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients.中国临界病例拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗效果的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.007.
2
Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions.与成功治疗的拔牙和不拔牙安氏II类1分类错牙合相关的长期牙颌形态变化。
Angle Orthod. 2000 Jun;70(3):208-19. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0208:LTPCAW>2.0.CO;2.
3
Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey.
在拔除第一磨牙后接受正畸治疗的成年患者中,上颌第三磨牙的自发萌出。
Clin Case Rep. 2020 Jun 29;8(8):1392-1398. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2934. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols.骨性牙颌与软组织变化在伴有非对称拔牙方案的 II 类分牙治疗中的体现。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 4;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0193-x.
美国错颌畸形患病率及正畸治疗需求:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES III)的估计
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13(2):97-106.
4
A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment.拔牙矫治与非拔牙矫治面部侧貌的对比研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Sep;114(3):265-76. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70208-2.
5
Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗中的治疗变化。
Eur J Orthod. 1998 Jun;20(3):225-36. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.3.225.
6
The effect of premolar extractions on the soft-tissue profile in adult African American females.前磨牙拔除对成年非裔美国女性软组织侧貌的影响。
Angle Orthod. 1997;67(2):129-36. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0129:TEOPEO>2.3.CO;2.
7
Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics.面部美学艺术与科学的选定方面。
Semin Orthod. 1995 Jun;1(2):105-26. doi: 10.1016/s1073-8746(95)80097-2.
8
Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of changes during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment.正畸治疗对面部轮廓的影响:非拔牙矫治与拔除四颗前磨牙矫治过程中变化的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 May;103(5):452-8. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81796-2.
9
Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted.拔除四颗前磨牙正畸治疗后软组织面部轮廓的变化
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(1):31-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0031:STFPCA>2.0.CO;2.
10
Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic.某大学正畸诊所拔牙频率的40年回顾
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(6):407-14. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0407:FROEFA>2.0.CO;2.