• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面对面指导和个体化方案可提高结肠镜检查患者肠道准备质量。

Face-to-Face Instruction and Personalized Regimens Improve the Quality of Inpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):3592-3600. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07290-x. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-021-07290-x
PMID:34705157
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor bowel preparation is commonly observed in inpatients undergoing colonoscopy, particularly those with higher risks for inadequate bowel preparation.

AIMS

The objective of this study was to determine whether personalized bowel preparation regimens combined with face-to-face instruction (FFI) could improve the quality of bowel preparation for inpatient.

METHODS

In this endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 320 inpatients were enrolled and randomly allocated (1:1) to the control and intervention groups. The intervention group received FFI and personalized bowel preparation regimens, while the control group received the routine bowel preparation regimen and education. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of procedure-related adverse events, incorrect diet restriction and laxative intake, etc. RESULTS: The adequate bowel preparation rate in the intervention group was significantly higher compared to control group [intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis: 70.0% vs 51.3%, P < 0.001; per-protocol (PP) analysis: 79.4% vs 58.6%, P < 0.001]. Bowel cleanliness was significantly improved in high-risk inpatients (ITT analysis: 65% vs 44.6%, P = 0.004; PP analysis: 73.0% vs 51.7%, P = 0.004) and in low-risk inpatients (ITT analysis: 80% vs 62.7%, P = 0.037; PP analysis: 92.3% vs 69.8%, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences between two groups regarding procedure-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalized bowel preparation regimens combined with FFI improve the rate of adequate bowel preparation, especially for patients with high-risk factors. As such, inpatients could benefit from this novel approach for better bowel preparation to ultimately improve the quality of colonoscopies.

摘要

背景

接受结肠镜检查的住院患者常出现肠道准备不佳的情况,尤其是那些肠道准备不佳风险较高的患者。

目的

本研究旨在确定个体化肠道准备方案联合面对面指导(FFI)是否可以提高住院患者的肠道准备质量。

方法

这是一项内镜医师设盲、随机对照试验,共纳入 320 名住院患者,按 1:1 比例随机分配至对照组和干预组。干预组接受 FFI 和个体化肠道准备方案,对照组接受常规肠道准备方案和教育。主要结局为肠道准备充分率。次要结局包括与操作相关的不良事件、饮食限制和泻药摄入不当的发生率等。

结果

干预组的肠道准备充分率明显高于对照组[意向治疗(ITT)分析:70.0%比 51.3%,P<0.001;符合方案(PP)分析:79.4%比 58.6%,P<0.001]。高危住院患者的肠道清洁度明显改善(ITT 分析:65%比 44.6%,P=0.004;PP 分析:73.0%比 51.7%,P=0.004)和低危住院患者(ITT 分析:80%比 62.7%,P=0.037;PP 分析:92.3%比 69.8%,P=0.003)。两组在与操作相关的不良事件方面无显著差异。

结论

个体化肠道准备方案联合 FFI 可提高肠道准备充分率,尤其是对高危因素患者。因此,这种新方法可使住院患者受益,更好地进行肠道准备,从而提高结肠镜检查的质量。

相似文献

1
Face-to-Face Instruction and Personalized Regimens Improve the Quality of Inpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.面对面指导和个体化方案可提高结肠镜检查患者肠道准备质量。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):3592-3600. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07290-x. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
Improving the quality of bowel preparation through an app for inpatients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.通过为接受结肠镜检查的住院患者开发的应用程序提高肠道准备质量:一项随机对照试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Apr;76(4):1037-1045. doi: 10.1111/jan.14295. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study.住院患者结肠镜检查中肠道准备量的效果。一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验研究的结果
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01373-1.
4
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Bowel Cleansing Regimens for Colonoscopy After Failed Bowel Preparation.多中心随机对照试验比较两种结肠镜检查前肠道准备失败后的肠道清洁方案。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;20(6):e1283-e1291. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
5
Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Plus Laxative Is a Good Alternative to Conventional Large Volume Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Single-Blinded Trial.含枸橼酸镁的比沙可啶钠(SPMC)加泻药在肠道准备中是传统大容量聚乙二醇的良好替代方案:一项多中心随机单盲试验
Gut Liver. 2015 Jul;9(4):494-501. doi: 10.5009/gnl14010.
6
An Educational Intervention to Improve Patient Outcomes for Colonoscopy.一项改善结肠镜检查患者预后的教育干预措施。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2023;46(1):23-29. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000716. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
7
Effects of a Personalized Smartphone App on Bowel Preparation Quality: Randomized Controlled Trial.个性化智能手机应用对肠道准备质量的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e26703. doi: 10.2196/26703.
8
A multicenter, prospective, inpatient feasibility study to evaluate the use of an intra-colonoscopy cleansing device to optimize colon preparation in hospitalized patients: the REDUCE study.一项多中心、前瞻性、住院患者可行性研究,旨在评估一种结肠镜内清洁装置在住院患者中优化结肠准备的使用:RE
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 May 22;21(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01817-2.
9
Randomized Controlled Trial: Split-dose and Same-day Large Volume Bowel Preparation for Afternoon Colonoscopy Have Similar Quality of Preparation.随机对照试验:下午结肠镜检查的分剂量和同日大剂量肠道准备具有相似的准备质量。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov/Dec;53(10):724-730. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001213.
10
SPLIT-DOSE BOWEL PREPARATION IS SUPERIOR TO STRAIGHT-DOSE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS UNDERGOING INPATIENT COLONOSCOPY.分剂量肠道准备在住院行结肠镜检查的住院患者中优于单次剂量。
Arq Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan-Mar;60(1):39-47. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.202301000-06.

引用本文的文献

1
Bowel preparation experiences and needs before follow-up colonoscopy in older adult postoperative colorectal cancer patients: A qualitative study.老年成人术后结直肠癌患者随访结肠镜检查前的肠道准备经历与需求:一项定性研究
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):2968-2978. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2968.
2
2L polyethylene glycol combined with castor oil versus 4L polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy among inpatients.2L 聚乙二醇联合蓖麻油与 4L 聚乙二醇用于住院患者结肠镜检查前肠道准备的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 21;102(29):e34294. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034294.
3
Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A cross-sectional study of the Chinese population.

本文引用的文献

1
Modifiable Factors Associated with Quality of Bowel Preparation Among Hospitalized Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy.与住院行结肠镜检查患者肠道准备质量相关的可调节因素。
J Hosp Med. 2019 May;14(5):278-283. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3173.
2
Predictors of Inadequate Inpatient Colonoscopy Preparation and Its Association with Hospital Length of Stay and Costs.住院结肠镜检查准备不充分的预测因素及其与住院时间和费用的关联。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Nov;60(11):3482-90. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3761-2. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
3
Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance.
优化结肠镜检查的肠道准备:一项针对中国人群的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;10:953441. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.953441. eCollection 2022.
4
Linked color imaging improves identification of early gastric cancer lesions by expert and non-expert endoscopists.链接色成像可提高专家和非专家内镜医师对早期胃癌病变的识别能力。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8316-8325. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09280-0. Epub 2022 May 4.
肠道准备质量对结肠镜检查中腺瘤识别及监测最佳时机的影响
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct;60(10):3092-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3737-2. Epub 2015 Jun 6.