Thrombosis Center, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Vascular Medicine, National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 167 Beilishi Road, Beijing, 100037, China.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Adult Cardiac Surgery Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100037, China.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 May;53(4):926-933. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02594-1. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
The long-term prognosis of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) receiving different treatments is deserved to be analyzed in modern era of CTEPH treatment. From 2013 to 2019, a total of 364 patients diagnosed with CTEPH were retrospectively included, 14 patients were lost during follow-up. Among 350 patients included in the final analysis: 123 underwent pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), 121 received balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), and 106 treated with targeted drug alone. The median period of follow-up was 51.2 months, the estimated survival at 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year was 97.1%, 93.3%, 86.9%, and 82.0% for the whole cohort; 100%, 99.20%, 96.5% and 92.5% in PEA group; 98.4%, 97.4%, 95.3% and 89.3% in BPA group;92.5%, 81.9%, 70.1% and 66.8% in patients who received targeted drug alone. In comparing with targeted treatment along, results of multivariate Cox analysis after adjusting the confounders showed that receiving PEA decreased the risk of death by 83% (HR [hazard ratio] 0.17, 95% CI [Confidence interval] 0.07-0.44) and receiving BPA decreased the risk of death by 89% (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04-0.29). In conclusion, the estimated survival of CTEPH patients at 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year was 97.1%, 93.3%, 86.9%, and 82.0% respectively. The intervention of revascularization, including PEA and BPA, were preferred than treating with targeted drug alone in the view of long-term prognosis of CTEPH.
慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)患者接受不同治疗的长期预后值得在 CTEPH 治疗的现代时代进行分析。2013 年至 2019 年,共回顾性纳入 364 例 CTEPH 患者,随访期间失访 14 例。最终纳入 350 例患者进行分析:123 例行肺动脉内膜切除术(PEA),121 例行球囊肺动脉成形术(BPA),106 例单独接受靶向药物治疗。中位随访时间为 51.2 个月,全队列的估计 1、3、5 和 7 年生存率分别为 97.1%、93.3%、86.9%和 82.0%;PEA 组为 100%、99.20%、96.5%和 92.5%;BPA 组为 98.4%、97.4%、95.3%和 89.3%;单独接受靶向药物治疗的患者为 92.5%、81.9%、70.1%和 66.8%。多变量 Cox 分析结果显示,与靶向治疗相比,调整混杂因素后,PEA 可使死亡风险降低 83%(HR [风险比] 0.17,95%CI [置信区间] 0.07-0.44),BPA 可使死亡风险降低 89%(HR 0.11,95%CI 0.04-0.29)。总之,CTEPH 患者的 1、3、5 和 7 年估计生存率分别为 97.1%、93.3%、86.9%和 82.0%。从 CTEPH 的长期预后来看,血管再通干预(包括 PEA 和 BPA)优于单独靶向药物治疗。