• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Transanal excision with adjuvant therapy for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features offers equivalent survival to radical resection: A National Cancer Database analysis.经肛门切除联合辅助治疗高危特征 T1N0 期直肠肿瘤的生存与根治性切除相当:国家癌症数据库分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;125(3):475-483. doi: 10.1002/jso.26734. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by transanal local excision for T2 rectal cancer confers equivalent survival benefit as traditional transabdominal resection.新辅助放化疗后经肛门局部切除 T2 期直肠癌与传统经腹切除术的生存获益相当。
Surgery. 2019 Jun;165(6):1193-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Survival Outcomes After Surgical Management of the Primary Tumor With and Without Radiotherapy for Metastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database (NCDB) Analysis.转移性直肠腺癌手术治疗联合或不联合放疗的生存结局:国家癌症数据库(NCDB)分析。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Jun;18(2):e237-e243. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
4
Chemoradiation and Local Excision for T2N0 Rectal Cancer Offers Equivalent Overall Survival Compared to Standard Resection: a National Cancer Database Analysis.放化疗联合局部切除术与标准切除术治疗 T2N0 期直肠癌的总生存相当:一项基于国家癌症数据库的分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Oct;21(10):1666-1674. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3536-5. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
5
Defining the Role of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.定义微创直肠切除术在局部进展期直肠腺癌中的作用。
Ann Surg. 2017 Oct;266(4):574-581. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002357.
6
Refining the Use of Adjuvant Oxaliplatin in Clinical Stage II or III Rectal Adenocarcinoma.优化辅助奥沙利铂在临床 II 期或 III 期直肠腺癌中的应用。
Oncologist. 2019 Aug;24(8):e671-e676. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0333. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
Surgical Resection for Primary Rectal Lymphoma: Support for Local Excision?原发性直肠淋巴瘤的手术切除:支持局部切除?
J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.034. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Preoperative chemoradiation followed by transanal excision for rectal cancer.术前同步放化疗后行经肛门切除术治疗直肠癌。
J Surg Res. 2008 Aug;148(2):244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.08.010. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
9
A systematic review of local excision followed by adjuvant therapy in early rectal cancer: are pT1 tumours the limit?早期直肠癌局部切除加辅助治疗的系统评价:pT1 肿瘤是极限吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;20(10):854-863. doi: 10.1111/codi.14340. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
10
Long-term outcome of local excision after preoperative chemoradiation for ypT0 rectal cancer.术前放化疗后局部切除治疗ypT0 直肠癌的长期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Nov;57(11):1245-52. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000221.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of fluid therapy combined with a preoperative glucose load regimen on postoperative recovery in patients with rectal cancer.液体疗法联合术前葡萄糖负荷方案对直肠癌患者术后恢复的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):2662-2670. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2662.
2
Endoscopic and trans-anal local excision vs. radical resection in the treatment of early rectal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.内镜下经肛门局部切除术与根治性切除术治疗早期直肠癌的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Dec 29;39(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04584-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Postoperative Complications on Oncologic Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium.术后并发症对直肠癌手术后肿瘤学结果的影响:美国直肠癌联合会的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;28(3):1712-1721. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08976-8. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
2
Perineural Invasion Is a Prognostic but not a Predictive Factor in Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer.神经周围侵犯是非转移性结肠癌的预后因素,但不是预测因素。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Oct;62(10):1212-1221. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001450.
3
Chemoradiation and Local Excision for T2N0 Rectal Cancer Offers Equivalent Overall Survival Compared to Standard Resection: a National Cancer Database Analysis.放化疗联合局部切除术与标准切除术治疗 T2N0 期直肠癌的总生存相当:一项基于国家癌症数据库的分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Oct;21(10):1666-1674. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3536-5. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
4
The results of local excision with or without postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for early rectal cancer among patients choosing to avoid radical surgery.选择避免根治性手术的早期直肠癌患者行局部切除术加或不加术后辅助放化疗的疗效。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Feb;19(2):139-147. doi: 10.1111/codi.13477.
5
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术相比的肿瘤学及围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 4;16:380. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5.
6
Meta-analysis of oncological outcomes after local excision of pT1-2 rectal cancer requiring adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy or completion surgery.局部切除 T1-2 期直肠癌后行辅助(放)化疗或完成手术的肿瘤学结局的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2016 Aug;103(9):1105-16. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10163. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
7
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放手术切除直肠癌对病理结局的影响:ALA-CART 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009.
8
Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks.系统评价结直肠吻合口漏的术前、术中和术后危险因素。
Br J Surg. 2015 Apr;102(5):462-79. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9697. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
9
Association of race and socioeconomic status and outcomes of patients with rectal cancer.直肠癌患者的种族和社会经济地位与结局的关系。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1142-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2837-x. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
10
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.直肠癌前切除术吻合口漏的危险因素。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Jan;148(1):65-71. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2.

经肛门切除联合辅助治疗高危特征 T1N0 期直肠肿瘤的生存与根治性切除相当:国家癌症数据库分析。

Transanal excision with adjuvant therapy for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features offers equivalent survival to radical resection: A National Cancer Database analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;125(3):475-483. doi: 10.1002/jso.26734. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1002/jso.26734
PMID:34705273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8961452/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines favor transabdominal radical resection (RR) over transanal local excision (TAX) followed by adjuvant therapy (TAXa) for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features. Comparison of oncologic outcomes between these approaches is limited, although the former is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. We hypothesize that such treatment strategies result in equivalent long-term survival.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Cancer Database (2010-2016) to identify patients with pT1N0 rectal adenocarcinoma with high-risk features who underwent TAX or RR for curative intent. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), evaluated with log-rank and Cox-proportional hazards testing.

RESULTS

A total of 1159 patients (age 67.4 ± 12.9 years; 56.6% male; 83.3% White) met study criteria, of which 1009 (87.1%) underwent RR and 150 (12.9%) underwent TAXa. Patients undergoing TAXa had shorter lengths of stay (RR = 6.5 days, TAXa = 2.7 days, p < 0.001). The 5-year OS was equivalent between groups. TAX without adjuvant therapy was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.78, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study to demonstrate equivalent 5-year OS between TAXa and RR for T1N0 rectal cancer with high-risk features. These findings may guide the development of prospective, randomized trials and influence changes in practice recommendations for early-stage rectal cancer.

摘要

背景

目前的指南倾向于对具有高危特征的 pT1N0 直肠肿瘤进行经腹根治性切除术(RR),而不是经肛门局部切除术(TAX)加辅助治疗(TAXa)。这些方法的肿瘤学结果比较有限,尽管前者与术后发病率增加有关。我们假设这些治疗策略会导致等效的长期生存。

方法

本研究使用国家癌症数据库(2010-2016 年)进行回顾性队列研究,以确定接受 TAX 或 RR 治疗的具有高危特征的 pT1N0 直肠腺癌患者。主要结局是 5 年总生存率(OS),采用对数秩和 Cox 比例风险检验进行评估。

结果

共有 1159 名患者(年龄 67.4±12.9 岁;56.6%为男性;83.3%为白人)符合研究标准,其中 1009 名(87.1%)接受 RR,150 名(12.9%)接受 TAXa。接受 TAXa 的患者住院时间更短(RR=6.5 天,TAXa=2.7 天,p<0.001)。两组的 5 年 OS 相当。未行辅助治疗的 TAX 与死亡率增加相关(风险比 1.81,95%置信区间 1.17-2.78,p=0.01)。

结论

这是最大的研究,证明了 T1N0 直肠肿瘤高危特征的 TAXa 和 RR 之间 5 年 OS 等效。这些发现可能指导前瞻性、随机试验的发展,并影响早期直肠癌治疗建议的变化。