Universidade Federal do Pampa. Uruguaiana, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste. Irati, Paraná, Brazil.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Oct 25;75(2):e20201389. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1389. eCollection 2021.
to analyze the reasons and motives that initiates the decision to choose a cesarean section, by describing the plots, power relationships, struggles, and systems of truths regarding this method of childbirth.
a qualitative study, inserted into a poststructuralist perspective, and conducted in a city in southern Rio Grande do Sul state. The settings were a teaching hospital and home residences. Thirteen postpartum women who had a cesarean section participated. The analysis consisted of questions based on the information produced and articulated with Foucauldian theories.
two categories were developed: "I wanted a vaginal delivery, but it was a cesarean section", and, "Are you sure you want a vaginal delivery: paths and detours in the choice of cesarean section".
the study allowed us to identify problems in the choice for a cesarean section, which is associated with the circulation of "truths" that occur via discourses on society.
通过描述有关分娩方式的情节、权力关系、斗争和真理体系，分析选择剖宫产的原因和动机。
这是一项定性研究，置于后结构主义视角下，在南里奥格兰德州的一个城市进行。地点是一所教学医院和家庭住所。共有 13 名接受剖宫产的产后妇女参与。分析包括基于所产生信息的问题，并与福柯的理论联系起来。
得出了两个类别：“我本来想顺产，但结果是剖宫产”，以及，“你确定要顺产吗：选择剖宫产的路径和弯路”。
这项研究使我们能够识别出选择剖宫产的问题，这与通过社会话语传播的“真相”有关。
