Su Na, Liu Bin-Bin, Wang Jun-Ru, Tong Ru-Chang, Ren Chen, Chang Zhao-Yang, Zhao Liang, Potter Daniel, Wen Jun
College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Herbarium of Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Oct 11;12:743643. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.743643. eCollection 2021.
The recognition, identification, and differentiation of closely related plant species present significant and notorious challenges to taxonomists. The group of , which comprises four to seven species, is an example of a group in which species delimitation and phylogenetic reconstruction have been difficult, due to the lack of clear morphological distinctions, limited sampling, and low informativeness of molecular evidence. Thus, the precise number of species in the group and the relationships among them remain unclear. Here, we used genome skimming to generate the DNA sequence data for 22 samples, including 17 individuals and five outgroups in Amygdaloideae of Rosaceae, from which we assembled the plastome and 446 single-copy nuclear (SCN) genes for each sample. The phylogenetic relationships of the group were then reconstructed using both concatenated and coalescent-based methods. We also identified eight highly variable regions and detected simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and repeat sequences in the species plastomes. The phylogenetic analysis based on the complete plastomes strongly supported three main subclades in the group of , while five subclades were recognized based on the nuclear tree. The phylogenetic network analysis detected six hybridization events. Integrating the nuclear and morphological evidence, we proposed to recognize five species within the group, i.e., , and . Within this group, the first three species are well-supported, while the gene flow occurring throughout the group seems to be especially frequent between and , eroding the barrier between them. The phylogenetic trees based on eight concatenated hypervariable regions had a similar topology with the complete plastomes, showing their potential as molecular markers and effective barcodes for further phylogeographic studies on .
对密切相关的植物物种进行识别、鉴定和区分,给分类学家带来了重大且棘手的挑战。由四到七个物种组成的该类群,就是一个物种界定和系统发育重建存在困难的例子,这是由于缺乏明确的形态学差异、采样有限以及分子证据的信息含量低所致。因此,该类群中物种的确切数量及其之间的关系仍不明确。在这里,我们使用基因组浅层测序为22个样本生成DNA序列数据,包括蔷薇科桃亚科的17个个体和5个外类群,从中我们为每个样本组装了质体基因组和446个单拷贝核基因。然后使用串联法和基于溯祖理论的方法重建了该类群的系统发育关系。我们还在该类群物种的质体基因组中鉴定出八个高度可变区域,并检测到简单序列重复(SSR)和重复序列。基于完整质体基因组的系统发育分析有力地支持了该类群中的三个主要亚分支,而基于核基因树则识别出五个亚分支。系统发育网络分析检测到六个杂交事件。综合核基因和形态学证据,我们建议在该类群中识别出五个物种,即……。在这个类群中,前三个物种得到了充分支持,而整个类群中发生的基因流在……和……之间似乎特别频繁,侵蚀了它们之间的屏障。基于八个串联的高变区域构建的系统发育树与完整质体基因组具有相似的拓扑结构,显示出它们作为分子标记和有效条形码用于进一步的……系统地理学研究的潜力。