Reda Sara, Rühl Heiko, Witkowski Jana, Müller Jens, Pavlova Anna, Oldenburg Johannes, Pötzsch Bernd
Institute of Experimental Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 11;8:755281. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.755281. eCollection 2021.
Protein C (PC) activity tests are routinely performed in a thrombophilia workup to screen for PC deficiency. Currently used tests combine conversion of PC to activated PC (APC) by the snake venom Protac with subsequent APC detection through hydrolysis of a chromogenic peptide substrate or prolongation of a clotting time. In this prospective cohort study, we analyzed how different modes of PC activation and subsequent APC determination influence the diagnostic accuracy of PC activity testing in a cohort of 31 patients with genetically confirmed PC deficiency. In addition to chromogenic and clot-based measurement, an oligonucleotide-based enzyme capture assay utilizing a basic exosite-targeting aptamer was used for APC detection. To study the influence of the PC activation step on diagnostic sensitivity, PC activation through Protac and through the thrombin-thrombomodulin (TM) complex were compared. Twenty-six (84%) and 24 (77%) PC deficient patients were identified as true-positive using the chromogenic and the clot-based PC activity assay, respectively. True-positive results increased to 27 (87%) when the basic exosite-targeting aptamer approach was used for APC measurement. Additional replacement of the PC activator Protac by thrombin-TM gave true-positive results in all patients. These data indicate that the mode of PC activation is crucial in determining the accuracy of PC activity testing and that diagnostic sensitivity can be significantly improved by replacing the PC activator Protac with thrombin-TM. APC detection using a basic exosite-targeting aptamer achieves high sensitivity toward mutations outside the active center while being less subject to interfering factors than clot-based PC activity assays.
蛋白C(PC)活性检测在血栓形成倾向检查中经常进行,以筛查PC缺乏症。目前使用的检测方法是将蛇毒Protac介导的PC转化为活化蛋白C(APC),随后通过发色肽底物的水解或凝血时间的延长来检测APC。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们分析了不同的PC激活模式和随后的APC测定如何影响31例基因确诊为PC缺乏症患者队列中PC活性检测的诊断准确性。除了发色法和基于凝血的测量外,还使用了一种基于寡核苷酸的酶捕获测定法,该方法利用一种靶向碱性外位点的适体来检测APC。为了研究PC激活步骤对诊断敏感性的影响,比较了通过Protac和凝血酶-血栓调节蛋白(TM)复合物激活PC的情况。使用发色法和基于凝血的PC活性测定法,分别有26例(84%)和24例(77%)PC缺乏症患者被确定为真阳性。当使用靶向碱性外位点的适体方法检测APC时,真阳性结果增加到27例(87%)。用凝血酶-TM替代PC激活剂Protac后,所有患者均得到真阳性结果。这些数据表明,PC激活模式对于确定PC活性检测的准确性至关重要,并且用凝血酶-TM替代PC激活剂Protac可显著提高诊断敏感性。使用靶向碱性外位点的适体检测APC对活性中心以外的突变具有高敏感性,并且比基于凝血的PC活性测定法更不易受干扰因素的影响。