Suppr超能文献

玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子联合和不联合局部非甾体类抗炎药治疗中心性糖尿病黄斑水肿。

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor with and without topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory in centre-involving diabetic macular edema.

机构信息

Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Vitreoretina, Vision Care and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;69(11):3279-3282. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1465_21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the mainstay in the management of center-involving diabetic macular edema (CI-DME). Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used to treat CI-DME as well. Whether there is any benefit of using both together has not been explored. The aim of this study was to compare visual acuity and OCT outcomes in patients with CI-DME who receive intravitreal anti-VEGF with and without topical NSAIDs in CI-DME.

METHODS

This was A retrospective observational study in two centers in India. The study compared visual and OCT parameters of patients with CI-DME treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy (group 1, N = 100) versus intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy with topical NSAIDs (group 2, N = 50) over 1-year follow-up. Continuous and categorical parameters were compared using parametric and nonparametric tests, respectively.

RESULTS

Over the 1-year follow-up, group 2 received more mean number of intravitreal injections (group 1: 2.26 ± 1.71 vs. group 2: 3.74 ± 2.42; P < 0.0001). There were no differences between the groups in visual acuity and OCT thickness at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy of topical NSAIDs with intravitreal anti-VEGF did not show any beneficial effects in terms of visual outcomes, reduction in central subfoveal thickness, or reduction in the mean number of injections in our study.

摘要

目的

玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗是治疗中心性糖尿病黄斑水肿(CI-DME)的主要方法。局部非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)也被用于治疗 CI-DME。是否联合使用这两种方法有任何益处尚未得到探索。本研究旨在比较接受玻璃体内抗 VEGF 治疗的 CI-DME 患者同时使用和不使用局部 NSAIDs 的视力和 OCT 结果。

方法

这是在印度的两个中心进行的回顾性观察性研究。该研究比较了接受玻璃体内抗 VEGF 单药治疗(第 1 组,N = 100)与玻璃体内抗 VEGF 联合局部 NSAIDs 治疗(第 2 组,N = 50)的 CI-DME 患者的视力和 OCT 参数,随访时间为 1 年。连续和分类参数分别使用参数和非参数检验进行比较。

结果

在 1 年的随访中,第 2 组接受的玻璃体内注射次数中位数(第 1 组:2.26 ± 1.71 次;第 2 组:3.74 ± 2.42 次;P < 0.0001)更多。两组在 1 年随访时的视力和 OCT 厚度无差异。

结论

在本研究中,局部 NSAIDs 联合玻璃体内抗 VEGF 治疗在视力结果、中心性黄斑下厚度减少或注射次数减少方面没有显示出任何有益效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef29/8725128/029000cec23b/IJO-69-3279-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验