• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定机遇和增强能力的动机,影响个性化数字健康中心髋部骨折护理模式的发展:混合方法探索性研究。

Identifying Opportunities, and Motivation to Enhance Capabilities, Influencing the Development of a Personalized Digital Health Hub Model of Care for Hip Fractures: Mixed Methods Exploratory Study.

机构信息

NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 28;23(10):e26886. doi: 10.2196/26886.

DOI:10.2196/26886
PMID:34709183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8587193/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most older people after a hip fracture injury never return to their prefracture status, and some are admitted to residential aged care facilities. Advancement of digital technology has helped in optimizing health care including self-management and telerehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand the perspectives of older patients with hip fracture and their family members and residential aged caregivers on the feasibility of developing a model of care using a personalized digital health hub.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods study in South Australia involving patients aged 50 years and older, their family members, and residential aged caregivers. Quantitative data analysis included basic demographic characteristics, and access to digital devices was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to examine correlations between the perceived role of a personalized digital health hub in improving health and the likelihood of subsequent use. Findings from qualitative analysis were interpreted using constructs of capability, opportunity, and motivation to help understand the factors influencing the likelihood of potential personalized digital health hub use.

RESULTS

This study recruited 100 participants-55 patients, 13 family members, and 32 residential aged caregivers. The mean age of the patients was 76.4 (SD 8.4, range 54-88) years, and 60% (33/55) of the patients were female. Approximately 50% (34/68) of the patients and their family members had access to digital devices, despite less than one-third using computers as part of their occupation. Approximately 72% (72/100) of the respondents thought that personalized digital health hub could improve health outcomes in patients. However, a moderate negative correlation existed with increasing age and likelihood of personalized digital health hub use (Spearman ρ=-0.50; P<.001), and the perceived role of the personalized digital health hub in improving health had a strong positive correlation with the likelihood of personalized digital health hub use by self (Spearman ρ=0.71; P<.001) and by society, including friends and family members (Spearman ρ=0.75; P<.001). Most patients (54/55, 98%) believed they had a family member, friend, or caregiver who would be able to help them use a personalized digital health hub. Qualitative analysis explored capability by understanding aspects of existing knowledge, including willingness to advance digital navigation skills. Access could be improved through supporting opportunities, and factors influencing intrinsic motivation were considered crucial for designing a personalized digital health hub-enabled model of care.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasized the complex relationship between capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for patients, their family members, and formal caregivers as a patient networked unit. The next stage of research will continue to involve a cocreation approach followed by iterative processes and understand the factors influencing the development and successful integration of complex digital health care interventions in real-world scenarios.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/8587193/9d56b7e8e916/jmir_v23i10e26886_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/8587193/9d56b7e8e916/jmir_v23i10e26886_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/8587193/9d56b7e8e916/jmir_v23i10e26886_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

大多数髋部骨折损伤后的老年人再也无法恢复到骨折前的状态,有些则入住了养老院。数字技术的进步有助于优化医疗保健,包括自我管理和远程康复。

目的

本研究旨在了解髋部骨折的老年患者及其家属和养老院护理人员对使用个性化数字健康中心开发护理模式的可行性的看法。

方法

我们在南澳大利亚进行了一项混合方法研究,涉及 50 岁及以上的患者、他们的家属和养老院护理人员。定量数据分析包括基本人口统计学特征,使用描述性统计分析数字设备的获取情况。使用 Spearman 秩相关检验来检验个性化数字健康中心在改善健康方面的感知作用与后续使用的可能性之间的相关性。使用能力、机会和动机的结构来解释定性分析结果,以帮助理解影响潜在个性化数字健康中心使用可能性的因素。

结果

这项研究招募了 100 名参与者-55 名患者、13 名家属和 32 名养老院护理人员。患者的平均年龄为 76.4(SD 8.4,范围 54-88)岁,60%(33/55)的患者为女性。尽管只有不到三分之一的患者将计算机作为职业的一部分,但大约有 50%(34/68)的患者及其家属可以使用数字设备。大约 72%(100/100)的受访者认为个性化数字健康中心可以改善患者的健康结果。然而,随着年龄的增长和个性化数字健康中心使用可能性的增加,存在中度负相关(Spearman ρ=-0.50;P<.001),而个性化数字健康中心在改善健康方面的感知作用与自我使用(Spearman ρ=0.71;P<.001)和社会使用(包括朋友和家人)的个性化数字健康中心使用可能性具有很强的正相关(Spearman ρ=0.75;P<.001)。大多数患者(55/55,98%)认为他们有一个可以帮助他们使用个性化数字健康中心的家庭成员、朋友或护理人员。定性分析通过了解现有知识的各个方面,包括愿意提高数字导航技能,探索了能力。可以通过支持机会来提高可访问性,并且影响内在动机的因素被认为是设计个性化数字健康中心支持的护理模式的关键。

结论

本研究强调了患者、其家属和正式护理人员作为患者网络单元的能力、动机和机会之间的复杂关系。下一阶段的研究将继续采用共同创造方法,然后进行迭代过程,并了解影响复杂数字医疗保健干预措施在实际场景中成功开发和整合的因素。

相似文献

1
Identifying Opportunities, and Motivation to Enhance Capabilities, Influencing the Development of a Personalized Digital Health Hub Model of Care for Hip Fractures: Mixed Methods Exploratory Study.确定机遇和增强能力的动机,影响个性化数字健康中心髋部骨折护理模式的发展:混合方法探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 28;23(10):e26886. doi: 10.2196/26886.
2
"Context, content, and system" supporting digital health hub (DHH)-enabled models of care (MoCs) for fragility hip fractures: perspectives of diverse multidisciplinary stakeholders in South Australia from qualitative in-depth interviews.“背景、内容和系统”支持脆性髋部骨折的数字健康中心 (DHH) 启用的护理模式 (MoC):来自南澳大利亚多元化多学科利益相关者的定性深入访谈观点。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Nov 6;16(1):167. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-01031-3.
3
Cocreation of a digital patient health hub to enhance education and person-centred integrated care post hip fracture: a mixed-methods study protocol.创建数字化患者健康中心以加强髋部骨折后教育和以患者为中心的整合护理:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 18;9(12):e033128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033128.
4
The Journey of Recovery: Caregivers' Perspectives From a Hip Fracture Telerehabilitation Clinical Trial.康复之旅:髋关节骨折远程康复临床试验中的护理人员观点。
Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa220.
5
Patient-clinician digital health interventions for the hip fracture population: a scoping review.患者-临床医生数字健康干预措施在髋部骨折人群中的应用:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):1052. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09784-y.
6
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
Development and Evaluation of a Post-Hip Fracture Instructional Workshop for Caregivers.为照顾者开发和评估髋关节骨折术后指导工作坊。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2020 Jul/Sep;43(3):128-136. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000230.
9
Recommendations made by patients, caregivers, providers, and decision-makers to improve transitions in care for older adults with hip fracture: a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada.患者、护理人员、医护人员和决策者提出的改善老年髋部骨折患者照护交接的建议:加拿大安大略省的一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02943-6.
10
Telerehabilitation to Address the Rehabilitation Gap in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Care: Survey of Patients.通过远程康复解决前交叉韧带护理中的康复差距:患者调查
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Sep 18;4(9):e19296. doi: 10.2196/19296.

引用本文的文献

1
Health care professionals intention to use digital health data hub working in East Gojjam Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: Technology acceptance modeling.埃塞俄比亚西北部戈贾姆东部医院的医疗保健专业人员使用数字健康数据中心的意向:技术接受模型
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0322460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322460. eCollection 2025.
2
Virtual Healthcare for Older Adults With Preventable Chronic Conditions: A Meta-synthesis of Quality Aspects.针对患有可预防慢性病的老年人的虚拟医疗保健:质量方面的元综合分析
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jul;44(7):1089-1108. doi: 10.1177/07334648241296791. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
3
Patient-clinician digital health interventions for the hip fracture population: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Personal digital health hubs for multiple conditions.多种疾病的个人数字健康中心。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Aug 1;98(8):569-575. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.249136. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
2
Innovations to improve access to musculoskeletal care.创新以改善肌肉骨骼护理的可及性。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;34(5):101559. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101559. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
3
Managing New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities.管理 COVID-19 大流行期间新发 1 型糖尿病:挑战与机遇。
患者-临床医生数字健康干预措施在髋部骨折人群中的应用:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):1052. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09784-y.
4
Barriers and Enablers to the Use of Web-Based Applications for Older Adults and Their Caregivers Post-Hip Fracture Surgery: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.基于 Web 的应用程序在老年髋部骨折术后患者及其照护者中的使用障碍和促进因素:一项描述性定性研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Nov 16;17:1635-1645. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S384822. eCollection 2022.
5
Family Caregivers' Experiences with Tele-Rehabilitation for Older Adults with Hip Fracture.家庭照顾者对髋部骨折老年人远程康复的体验
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 13;10(24):5850. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245850.
6
"Context, content, and system" supporting digital health hub (DHH)-enabled models of care (MoCs) for fragility hip fractures: perspectives of diverse multidisciplinary stakeholders in South Australia from qualitative in-depth interviews.“背景、内容和系统”支持脆性髋部骨折的数字健康中心 (DHH) 启用的护理模式 (MoC):来自南澳大利亚多元化多学科利益相关者的定性深入访谈观点。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Nov 6;16(1):167. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-01031-3.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jun;22(6):431-439. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0161. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
4
Video consultations for covid-19.针对新冠肺炎的视频问诊
BMJ. 2020 Mar 12;368:m998. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m998.
5
Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19.近乎完美?用于新冠疫情的远程医疗
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1679-1681. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2003539. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
6
Cocreation of a digital patient health hub to enhance education and person-centred integrated care post hip fracture: a mixed-methods study protocol.创建数字化患者健康中心以加强髋部骨折后教育和以患者为中心的整合护理:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 18;9(12):e033128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033128.
7
Lifestyle behaviour change for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.生活方式行为改变预防慢性肾脏病进展:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e031625. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031625.
8
Utilising Digital Health Technology to Support Patient-Healthcare Provider Communication in Fragility Fracture Recovery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.利用数字健康技术支持脆性骨折康复患者-医疗保健提供者的沟通:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 22;16(20):4047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16204047.
9
Understanding successful development of complex health and healthcare interventions and its drivers from the perspective of developers and wider stakeholders: an international qualitative interview study.从开发者和更广泛的利益相关者的角度理解复杂的健康和医疗保健干预措施及其驱动因素的成功发展:一项国际定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 30;9(5):e028756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028756.
10
Comparison of hospitalised trends, treatment cost and health outcomes of fall-related hip fracture for people aged ≥ 65 years living in residential aged care and the community.比较居住在养老院和社区中≥65 岁老年人因跌倒导致髋部骨折的住院趋势、治疗费用和健康结局。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Feb;30(2):311-321. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4800-6. Epub 2018 Dec 19.