College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids and East Lansing, MI, USA.
Spectrum Health Hospitals, Grand Rapids, MI and Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, USA.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Mar;27(1):167-187. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10079-2. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
To perform a scoping review to determine what is known about emotional intelligence (EI) in undergraduate medical education (UME). Two main questions were asked: A. What medical student characteristics are associated with EI? Are there correlations with demographic or other factors? B. What research studies have been done on EI in UME? For example, is there evidence EI changes over time as a result of personal experiences? Should EI be used as an admission criterion? Can EI improve as a result of experiences or deliberate interventions?
The authors searched four databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Education Resources Information Center, and Web of Science) for all papers published up to and including December 2020. Two reviewers independently screened articles to determine if they met inclusion criteria. All authors extracted and analyzed data.
A set of 1520 papers on the topic of emotional intelligence was identified, with 119 papers meeting inclusion criteria. Most studies were done at international locations with only 17 done at US medical schools. Seventy-five were cohort or cross-sectional studies. Study populations were mixed among the studies, with year of medical study, inclusion of other healthcare students, and participation rates among the inter-study differences noted.
Numerous gaps in the literature on EI exist with several points being clear: (1) there is disagreement on the definition of EI, (2) it is undetermined whether EI is a trait or an ability, and (3) there is marked variability among the instruments used to measure EI. It is also becoming apparent that using EI determination may be helpful as a component of the admission process, higher EI is likely related to improved clinical reasoning, and higher EI contributes to more effective stress management.
进行范围综述,以确定本科医学教育(UME)中情绪智力(EI)的已知情况。主要提出了两个问题:A. 哪些医学生的特征与 EI 相关?是否与人口统计学或其他因素相关?B. UME 中关于 EI 的研究有哪些?例如,是否有证据表明 EI 会随着个人经历而随时间变化?是否应将 EI 用作入学标准?是否可以通过经验或刻意干预来提高 EI?
作者在四个数据库(PubMed、PsycInfo、教育资源信息中心和 Web of Science)中搜索了截至 2020 年 12 月发表的所有论文。两名评审员独立筛选文章,以确定是否符合纳入标准。所有作者都提取和分析了数据。
确定了一组关于情绪智力主题的 1520 篇论文,其中有 119 篇符合纳入标准。大多数研究是在国际地点进行的,只有 17 项是在美国医学院进行的。有 75 项是队列或横断面研究。研究人群在研究中混合在一起,医学研究的年份、其他医疗保健学生的纳入以及参与率是研究之间的差异。
关于 EI 的文献存在许多空白,有几点是明确的:(1)EI 的定义存在分歧,(2)尚未确定 EI 是一种特质还是一种能力,(3)用于测量 EI 的工具差异很大。越来越明显的是,使用 EI 确定可能有助于作为入学过程的一部分,更高的 EI 可能与改善临床推理有关,更高的 EI 有助于更有效地进行压力管理。