Suppr超能文献

光子与粒子计算机断层扫描预测组织相对阻止本领的实验比较。

Experimental comparison of photon versus particle computed tomography to predict tissue relative stopping powers.

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.

Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, London, UK.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2022 Jan;49(1):474-487. doi: 10.1002/mp.15283. Epub 2021 Nov 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Measurements comparing relative stopping power (RSP) accuracy of state-of-the-art systems representing single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography (SECT/DECT) with proton CT (pCT) and helium CT (HeCT) in biological tissue samples.

METHODS

We used 16 porcine and bovine samples of various tissue types and water, covering an RSP range from 0.90 0.06 to 1.78 0.05. Samples were packed and sealed into 3D-printed cylinders (  cm,  cm) and inserted into an in-house designed cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom (  cm,  cm). We scanned the phantom in a commercial SECT and DECT (120 kV; 100  and 140 kV/Sn (tin-filtered)); and acquired pCT and HeCT (  MeV/u, 2 steps, (p)/ (He) particles/projection) with a particle imaging prototype. RSP maps were calculated from SECT/DECT using stoichiometric methods and from pCT/HeCT using the DROP-TVS algorithm. We estimated the average RSP of each tissue per modality in cylindrical volumes of interest and compared it to ground truth RSP taken from peak-detection measurements.

RESULTS

Throughout all samples, we observe the following root-mean-squared RSP prediction errors combined uncertainty from reference measurement and imaging: SECT 3.10 2.88%, DECT 0.75 2.80%, pCT 1.19 2.81%, and HeCT 0.78 2.81%. The largest mean errors combined uncertainty per modality are SECT 8.22 2.79% in cortical bone, DECT 1.74 2.00% in back fat, pCT 1.80 4.27% in bone marrow, and HeCT 1.37 4.25% in bone marrow. Ring artifacts were observed in both pCT and HeCT reconstructions, imposing a systematic shift to predicted RSPs.

CONCLUSION

Comparing state-of-the-art SECT/DECT technology and a pCT/HeCT prototype, DECT provided the most accurate RSP prediction, closely followed by particle imaging. The novel modalities pCT and HeCT have the potential to further improve on RSP accuracies with work focusing on the origin and correction of ring artifacts. Future work will study accuracy of proton treatment plans using RSP maps from investigated imaging modalities.

摘要

目的

测量比较最先进的单能和双能计算机断层扫描(SECT/DECT)系统与质子 CT(pCT)和氦 CT(HeCT)在生物组织样本中的相对阻止本领(RSP)准确性。

方法

我们使用了来自各种组织类型的 16 个猪和牛样本以及水,涵盖了从 0.90 0.06 到 1.78 0.05 的 RSP 范围。样本被包装并密封在 3D 打印的圆柱体( cm, cm)中,并插入到内部设计的圆柱形聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)体模( cm, cm)中。我们在商用 SECT 和 DECT(120 kV;100 和 140 kV/Sn(锡滤过))中扫描体模,并使用粒子成像原型机采集 pCT 和 HeCT( MeV/u,2 步, (p)/ (He)粒子/投影)。从 SECT/DECT 使用化学计量法和从 pCT/HeCT 使用 DROP-TVS 算法计算 RSP 图。我们从每个圆柱体感兴趣区域的每个模式估计了每个组织的平均 RSP,并将其与来自峰值检测测量的地面真实 RSP 进行比较。

结果

在所有样本中,我们观察到以下均方根 RSP 预测误差 参考测量和成像的组合不确定度:SECT 3.10 2.88%,DECT 0.75 2.80%,pCT 1.19 2.81%,HeCT 0.78 2.81%。每种模式的最大平均误差 组合不确定性是皮质骨中的 SECT 8.22 2.79%,背脂中的 DECT 1.74 2.00%,骨髓中的 pCT 1.80 4.27%和骨髓中的 HeCT 1.37 4.25%。在 pCT 和 HeCT 重建中都观察到了环状伪影,这导致了对预测 RSP 的系统偏移。

结论

将最先进的 SECT/DECT 技术与 pCT/HeCT 原型进行比较,DECT 提供了最准确的 RSP 预测,紧随其后的是粒子成像。新型模态 pCT 和 HeCT 具有进一步提高 RSP 准确性的潜力,重点是环状伪影的来源和校正。未来的工作将研究使用研究成像模态的 RSP 图的质子治疗计划的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验