• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cigarette Brand Use and Sexual Orientation: Intersections With Gender and Race or Ethnicity.香烟品牌使用与性取向:与性别、种族或民族的交集。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Oct 28;18:E94. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.210160.
2
Trends in sexual orientation disparities in cigarette smoking: Intersections between race/ethnicity and sex.吸烟行为的性取向差异趋势:种族/民族和性别的交叉点。
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106760. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106760. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
Association of Coming Out as Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual+ and Risk of Cigarette Smoking in a Nationally Representative Sample of Youth and Young Adults.出柜为女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋与青年和年轻成年人全国代表性样本中吸烟风险的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Jan 1;175(1):56-63. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3565.
4
Substance Use Disparities at the Intersection of Sexual Identity and Race/Ethnicity: Results from the 2015-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.物质使用在性认同和种族/民族交叉点上的差异:2015-2018 年全国药物使用与健康调查的结果。
LGBT Health. 2020 Aug/Sep;7(6):283-291. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2019.0352. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
5
Inequities in tobacco advertising exposure among young adult sexual, racial and ethnic minorities: examining intersectionality of sexual orientation with race and ethnicity.年轻成年人性取向、种族和民族的烟草广告接触不公平现象:检验性取向与种族和民族的交叉性。
Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):84-93. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055313. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Comparing the effects of organic, natural, and no additives labels on tobacco packaging between Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual (LGB) and heterosexual smokers.比较有机、天然和无添加剂标签对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋(LGB)和异性恋吸烟者烟草包装的影响。
Addict Behav. 2019 Apr;91:175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
Harm Perceptions of Menthol and Nonmenthol Cigarettes Differ by Brand, Race/Ethnicity, and Gender in US Adult Smokers: Results from PATH Wave 1.美国成年吸烟者中,薄荷醇和非薄荷醇香烟的危害感知因品牌、种族/民族和性别而异:PATH 波 1 研究结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Mar 30;21(4):439-449. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx277.
8
Similarities and Differences in Substance Use Patterns Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Mexican Adult Smokers.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和异性恋墨西哥成年烟民在物质使用模式上的异同。
LGBT Health. 2021 Nov;8(8):545-553. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2020.0457. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
9
Menthol cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别成年人中吸薄荷醇香烟的情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.044. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
10
Cigarette Smoking and the Role of Menthol in Tobacco Use Inequalities for Sexual Minorities.吸烟与薄荷醇在烟草使用不平等中的作用:性少数群体。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Oct 7;23(11):1942-1946. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab101.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Tobacco Advertising Receptivity Among Young Adults by Sexual Identity and Sex: Findings From the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.按性取向和性别划分的青年成年人对烟草广告接受度的差异:烟草与健康研究人群评估的结果
Ann LGBTQ Public Popul Health. 2024 Jun;5(2):155-175. doi: 10.1891/LGBTQ-2022-0036.
2
The association of gender with receptive and distributive needle sharing among individuals who inject drugs.性别与注射吸毒者接受性和分配性共用针具的关联。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Sep 30;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00689-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Potential Impact of Cigarette Packs Designed for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Adults: A Randomized Experiment to Inform U.S. Regulation, 2018.评估为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别成年人设计的香烟包装的潜在影响:一项为美国监管提供信息的随机试验,2018年。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1_suppl):157S-164S. doi: 10.1177/1524839919879923.
2
Comparing the effects of organic, natural, and no additives labels on tobacco packaging between Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual (LGB) and heterosexual smokers.比较有机、天然和无添加剂标签对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋(LGB)和异性恋吸烟者烟草包装的影响。
Addict Behav. 2019 Apr;91:175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
3
Disparities in retail marketing for menthol cigarettes in the United States, 2015.美国薄荷醇香烟零售营销的差异,2015 年。
Health Place. 2018 Sep;53:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) View it Differently Than Non-LGBT: Exposure to Tobacco-related Couponing, E-cigarette Advertisements, and Anti-tobacco Messages on Social and Traditional Media.同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者(LGBT)与非 LGBT 群体的看法不同:在社交媒体和传统媒体上接触与烟草相关的优惠券、电子烟广告和反烟草信息。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Mar 30;21(4):513-522. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty049.
5
Harm Perceptions of Menthol and Nonmenthol Cigarettes Differ by Brand, Race/Ethnicity, and Gender in US Adult Smokers: Results from PATH Wave 1.美国成年吸烟者中,薄荷醇和非薄荷醇香烟的危害感知因品牌、种族/民族和性别而异:PATH 波 1 研究结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Mar 30;21(4):439-449. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx277.
6
Misperceptions of harm among Natural American Spirit smokers: results from wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study (2013-2014).美国原住民吸食天然美国精神牌香烟者对危害的误解:烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究第一波(2013 - 2014年)结果
Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e61-e67. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053265. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
7
It's complicated: Examining smokers' relationships with their cigarette brands.情况很复杂:审视吸烟者与其香烟品牌之间的关系。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Dec;30(8):887-894. doi: 10.1037/adb0000225. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
Correlates of current menthol cigarette and flavored other tobacco product use among U.S. young adults.美国年轻成年人中当前薄荷醇香烟及调味烟草制品使用情况的相关因素
Addict Behav. 2016 Nov;62:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 May 31.
9
Trends in market share of leading cigarette brands in the USA: national survey on drug use and health 2002-2013.美国主要香烟品牌的市场份额趋势:2002 - 2013年全国药物使用与健康调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e008813. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008813.
10
Menthol cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别成年人中吸薄荷醇香烟的情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.044. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

香烟品牌使用与性取向:与性别、种族或民族的交集。

Cigarette Brand Use and Sexual Orientation: Intersections With Gender and Race or Ethnicity.

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850. Email:

National Cancer Institute, Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Rockville, Maryland.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Oct 28;18:E94. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.210160.

DOI:10.5888/pcd18.210160
PMID:34710347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8588870/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations have higher cigarette smoking rates than heterosexual populations. The tobacco industry has leveraged LGB, gender, and racial or ethnic identities to establish cigarette brand preference. We examined cigarette brand use among smokers by sexual orientation and the implications of gender and race or ethnicity for brand use.

METHODS

We used the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; 2015-2017) to conduct weighted bivariate analyses in 2019-2020 of the prevalence of 5 commonly used cigarette brands among adult smokers (N = 24,310) by sexual orientation. We conducted weighted regressions to test relationships between sexual orientation and brand use and interactions between sexual orientation, gender (defined in NSDUH as male or female), and race or ethnicity.

RESULTS

LGB smokers were more likely to use Camel (lesbian/gay, OR = 1.7 [95% CI, 1.2-2.3], bisexual, OR = 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.2]) and American Spirit cigarettes (lesbian/gay, OR = 2.8 [95% CI, 1.9-4.1], bisexual, OR = 3.2 [95% CI, 2.5-4.1]) than heterosexual smokers. Lesbian/gay smokers had higher odds of Marlboro cigarette use (OR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) than heterosexual smokers. Bisexual smokers were more likely to smoke Newport cigarettes (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.1) than heterosexual smokers. Interactions between LGB and female identities (vs gay or bisexual male) were positively associated with Camel, Marlboro, and Newport use. The interaction between lesbian/gay and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (vs lesbian/gay White) was also positively associated with Newport use.

CONCLUSION

LGB smokers may be more likely to smoke some commonly used cigarette brands than heterosexual smokers, and gender and race or ethnicity may have implications for brand preference. Future research could examine specific contributors to brand use among LGB smokers (eg, tobacco marketing).

摘要

介绍

女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋(LGB)人群的吸烟率高于异性恋人群。烟草业利用 LGB、性别以及种族或民族特征来建立香烟品牌偏好。我们研究了性取向对吸烟者香烟品牌使用的影响,以及性别和种族或民族特征对品牌使用的影响。

方法

我们利用 2015-2017 年全国毒品使用与健康调查(NSDUH)的数据,于 2019-2020 年对 24310 名成年吸烟者进行了加权双变量分析,以了解他们对五种常用香烟品牌的使用情况。我们进行了加权回归,以检验性取向与品牌使用之间的关系以及性取向、性别(NSDUH 定义为男性或女性)和种族或民族之间的相互作用。

结果

LGB 吸烟者更有可能使用骆驼牌(女同性恋/男同性恋,比值比[OR] = 1.7[95%置信区间[CI],1.2-2.3];双性恋,OR = 1.8[95% CI,1.5-2.2])和美国精神牌香烟(女同性恋/男同性恋,OR = 2.8[95% CI,1.9-4.1];双性恋,OR = 3.2[95% CI,2.5-4.1]),而非异性恋吸烟者。女同性恋/男同性恋吸烟者使用万宝路香烟的几率高于异性恋吸烟者(OR = 1.2;95% CI,1.0-1.4)。双性恋吸烟者更有可能吸食新港香烟(OR = 1.7;95% CI,1.4-2.1),而非异性恋吸烟者。LGB 和女性身份(而非同性恋或双性恋男性)之间的相互作用与骆驼牌、万宝路和新港的使用呈正相关。女同性恋/男同性恋和西班牙裔/拉丁裔种族(而非女同性恋/男同性恋白人)之间的相互作用也与新港的使用呈正相关。

结论

LGB 吸烟者可能比异性恋吸烟者更有可能使用一些常用香烟品牌,而性别和种族或民族特征可能对品牌偏好产生影响。未来的研究可以考察 LGB 吸烟者中品牌使用的具体原因(例如,烟草营销)。