• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中低收入国家药品知识产权许可的经济和公共卫生影响:模型研究。

The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study.

机构信息

Medicines Patent Pool, Geneva, Switzerland.

Medicines Patent Pool, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2022 Feb;7(2):e169-e176. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00202-4. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00202-4
PMID:34710359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8809901/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-exclusive voluntary licensing that is access-oriented has been suggested as an option to increase access to medicines to address the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, there has been little research on the effect of licensing, mainly focused on economic and supply chain considerations, and not on the benefits in terms of health outcomes. We aimed to study the economic and health effect of voluntary licensing for medicines for HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS

A robust modelling framework was created to examine the difference between scenarios, with (factual) and without (counterfactual) a Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) licence for two medicines, dolutegravir and daclatasvir. Data were obtained from MPP licensees, as well as a large number of external sources. The primary outcomes were the cost savings and health impact between scenarios with and without MPP licences across all LMICs. Through its licences, MPP had access to the volumes and prices of licensed generic products sold in all covered countries on a quarterly basis. These data informed the volumes, prices, and uptake for the past factual scenarios and were the basis for modelling the future factual scenarios. These scenarios were then compared with a set of counterfactual scenarios in the absence of the studied licences.

FINDINGS

Cumulatively, between 2017 and 2032, the model's central assumptions predicted an additional uptake of 15·494 (range 14·406-15·494) million patient-years of dolutegravir-based HIV treatments, 151 839 (34 575-312 973) deaths averted, and US$3·074 (1·837-5·617) billion saved through the MPP licence compared with the counterfactual scenario. For daclatasvir-based HCV treatments, the cumulative effect from 2015 to 2026 was predicted to be an additional uptake of 428 244 (127 584-636 270) patients treated with daclatasvir, 4070 (225-6323) deaths averted, and $107·593 (30·377-121·284) million saved with the licence compared with the counterfactual scenario.

INTERPRETATION

The chain of effects linking upstream licensing to downstream outcomes can be modelled. Accordingly, credible quantitative estimates of economic and health effects arising from access-oriented voluntary licensing were obtained based on assumptions that early generic competition leads to price reductions that influence procurement decisions and enable the faster and broader uptake of recommended medicines, with beneficial economic and health effects.

FUNDING

Unitaid.

摘要

背景

以获取为导向的非独家自愿许可已被提议作为增加药物获取以应对 COVID-19 大流行的一种选择。迄今为止,关于许可的影响的研究很少,主要集中在经济和供应链方面,而不是在健康结果方面的收益。我们旨在研究在中低收入国家(LMICs)中针对艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)药物的自愿许可的经济和健康影响。

方法

创建了一个稳健的建模框架来研究有(实际)和没有(假设)药品专利池(MPP)许可情况下两种药物(多替拉韦和达芦那韦)的方案之间的差异。数据来自 MPP 许可方以及大量外部来源。主要结果是在所有 LMIC 中,有和没有 MPP 许可的情况下的成本节约和健康影响。通过其许可,MPP 可以按季度获得在所有涵盖国家/地区销售的许可仿制药的数量和价格。这些数据为过去实际情况下的数量、价格和采用情况提供了信息,并为未来实际情况的建模提供了依据。然后,将这些方案与没有研究许可的一组假设方案进行了比较。

结果

模型的中心假设预测,在 2017 年至 2032 年期间,累积起来,多替拉韦为基础的 HIV 治疗方案的采用量将增加 1549.4 万(范围为 1440.6-1549.4)人年,通过 MPP 许可可以避免 151839 人(34575-312973)死亡,与假设方案相比,节省 30.74 亿美元(18.377-56.177)。对于达芦那韦为基础的 HCV 治疗方案,预计从 2015 年至 2026 年的累积效果将是接受达芦那韦治疗的患者增加 428244 人(127584-636270),避免 4070 人(225-6323)死亡,与假设方案相比,通过许可节省 10.7593 亿美元(30.377-121.284)。

解释

可以对将上游许可与下游结果联系起来的连锁效应进行建模。因此,根据早期仿制药竞争导致价格降低,从而影响采购决策并使推荐药物更快、更广泛地采用的假设,获得了与以获取为导向的自愿许可相关的经济和健康影响的可信定量估计,从而产生了有益的经济和健康影响。

资金来源

联合国艾滋病规划署。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a3e/8809901/0910918e75fc/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a3e/8809901/9faa0547f6d5/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a3e/8809901/8bace04c6d4f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a3e/8809901/0910918e75fc/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a3e/8809901/9faa0547f6d5/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a3e/8809901/8bace04c6d4f/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a3e/8809901/0910918e75fc/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study.中低收入国家药品知识产权许可的经济和公共卫生影响:模型研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Feb;7(2):e169-e176. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00202-4. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
Projected savings through public health voluntary licences of HIV drugs negotiated by the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP).通过药品专利池(MPP)协商达成的艾滋病毒药物公共卫生自愿许可预计节省的费用。
PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0177770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177770. eCollection 2017.
3
Effect of voluntary licences for hepatitis C medicines on access to treatment: a difference-in-differences analysis.自愿许可丙肝药物对治疗可及性的影响:差异中的差异分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Sep;7(9):e1189-e1196. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30266-9. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
4
Intellectual property licensing of therapeutics during the COVID-19 crisis: lessons learnt for pandemic preparedness and response.COVID-19 危机期间治疗方法的知识产权许可:对大流行防范和应对的经验教训。
Global Health. 2024 Jul 2;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01057-5.
5
Expanding access to biotherapeutics in low-income and middle-income countries through public health non-exclusive voluntary intellectual property licensing: considerations, requirements, and opportunities.通过公共卫生非专有自愿知识产权许可扩大在低收入和中等收入国家获得生物治疗药物的机会:考虑因素、要求和机会。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jan;11(1):e145-e154. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00460-0. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
Voluntary licensing of long-acting HIV prevention and treatment regimens: using a proven collaboration- and competition-based mechanism to rapidly expand at-scale, sustainable, quality-assured and affordable supplies in LMICs.长效 HIV 预防和治疗方案的自愿许可:利用成熟的合作和竞争机制,在中低收入国家迅速扩大大规模、可持续、有质量保证且负担得起的供应。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2023 Jul;26 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e26092. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26092.
7
Additional resource needs for viral hepatitis elimination through universal health coverage: projections in 67 low-income and middle-income countries, 2016-30.通过全民健康覆盖消除病毒性肝炎的额外资源需求:2016-2030 年 67 个低收入和中等收入国家的预测。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Sep;7(9):e1180-e1188. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30272-4. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
8
Treatment advocate tactics to expand access to antiviral therapy for HIV and viral hepatitis C in low- to high-income settings: making sure no one is left behind.在中低收入国家和地区,治疗倡导者采取策略扩大艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒抗病毒治疗的可及性:确保不落下任何人。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Apr;21 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):e25060. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25060.
9
The 'Netflix plus model': can subscription financing improve access to medicines in low- and middle-income countries?“网飞+模式”:订阅融资能否改善中低收入国家的药品可及性?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2021 Apr;16(2):113-123. doi: 10.1017/S1744133120000031. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals in High-Income Countries: A Comparative Analysis.高收入国家药品强制许可:比较分析。
Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):284-313. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12557. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prices and Affordability of Essential Medicines in 72 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Markets.72个低收入、中等收入和高收入市场基本药物的价格与可负担性
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252043. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2043.
2
Intellectual property licensing of therapeutics during the COVID-19 crisis: lessons learnt for pandemic preparedness and response.COVID-19 危机期间治疗方法的知识产权许可:对大流行防范和应对的经验教训。
Global Health. 2024 Jul 2;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01057-5.
3
Feasibility, safety, efficacy and potential scaling-up of sofosbuvir-based HCV treatment in Central and West Africa: (TAC ANRS 12311 trial).

本文引用的文献

1
New licences for the COVID-19 Technology Access Pool.新冠技术获取池的新许可证。
Lancet Microbe. 2023 Dec;4(12):e971. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00329-4. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
Global public health efforts to address HIV and related communicable disease syndemics.全球公共卫生努力应对艾滋病毒和相关传染病综合征。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2020 Jul;15(4):261-265. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000636.
3
Patent pooling to increase access to essential medicines.专利池以增加基本药物的可及性。
基于索磷布韦的丙型肝炎病毒治疗在中非和西非的可行性、安全性、疗效及潜在推广情况:(ANRS 12311试验)
Sci Rep. 2024 May 3;14(1):10244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57013-1.
4
Negotiating public-health intellectual property licensing agreements to increase access to health technologies: an insider's story.谈判公共卫生知识产权许可协议以增加卫生技术的获取:内幕故事。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012964.
5
Voluntary licensing of long-acting HIV prevention and treatment regimens: using a proven collaboration- and competition-based mechanism to rapidly expand at-scale, sustainable, quality-assured and affordable supplies in LMICs.长效 HIV 预防和治疗方案的自愿许可:利用成熟的合作和竞争机制,在中低收入国家迅速扩大大规模、可持续、有质量保证且负担得起的供应。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2023 Jul;26 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e26092. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26092.
6
Prospects for Long-Acting Treatments for Hepatitis C.长效治疗丙型肝炎的前景。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 21;75(Suppl 4):S525-S529. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac715.
7
TRIPS to Where? A Narrative Review of the Empirical Literature on Intellectual Property Licensing Models to Promote Global Diffusion of Essential Medicines.走向何方的贸易相关知识产权协定?关于促进基本药物全球传播的知识产权许可模式实证文献的叙述性综述
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Dec 27;14(1):48. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010048.
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Aug 1;97(8):575-577. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.229179. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
Effect of voluntary licences for hepatitis C medicines on access to treatment: a difference-in-differences analysis.自愿许可丙肝药物对治疗可及性的影响:差异中的差异分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Sep;7(9):e1189-e1196. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30266-9. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
5
Does the political will exist to bring quality-assured and affordable drugs to low- and middle-income countries?是否存在将质量有保证且价格可承受的药品带给低收入和中等收入国家的政治意愿?
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1586317. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1586317.
6
Risks and benefits of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral drug regimens in sub-Saharan Africa: a modelling study.撒哈拉以南非洲地区基于多替拉韦的抗逆转录病毒药物方案的风险和获益:一项建模研究。
Lancet HIV. 2019 Feb;6(2):e116-e127. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30317-5. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
7
Prices of Generic Drugs Associated with Numbers of Manufacturers.与制造商数量相关的仿制药价格。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2597-2598. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1711899.
8
Projected savings through public health voluntary licences of HIV drugs negotiated by the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP).通过药品专利池(MPP)协商达成的艾滋病毒药物公共卫生自愿许可预计节省的费用。
PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0177770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177770. eCollection 2017.
9
Essential medicines for universal health coverage.全民健康覆盖的基本药物。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):403-476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
10
Projected Uptake of New Antiretroviral (ARV) Medicines in Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Forecast Analysis 2015-2025.低收入和中等收入国家成人新型抗逆转录病毒药物的预计使用情况:2015 - 2025年预测分析
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0164619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164619. eCollection 2016.