Suppr超能文献

血浆肿瘤和代谢相关生物标志物 AMBP、LPL 和 Glyoxalase I 可区分射血分数保留的心力衰竭合并肺动脉高压与特发性肺动脉高压。

Plasma tumour and metabolism related biomarkers AMBP, LPL and Glyoxalase I differentiate heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with pulmonary hypertension from pulmonary arterial hypertension.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, The Section for Cardiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; The Haemodynamic Lab, The Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, Heart and Lung Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, The Section for Cardiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; The Haemodynamic Lab, The Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, Heart and Lung Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2021 Dec 15;345:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.10.136. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discrimination of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with pulmonary hypertension (HFpEF-PH) from pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is crucial for clinical management but may be challenging due to similarities in clinical and comorbid characteristics. We aimed to investigate tumour and metabolism related proteins in differentiating HFpEF-PH from PAH.

METHODS

Sixty-nine tumour and metabolism plasma proteins were analysed with proximity extension assay in heathy controls (n = 20), patients with PAH (n = 48) and LHF-PH (n = 67) [HFpEF-PH (n = 31) and HF reduced EF-PH (n = 36)]. Haemodynamics were assessed with right heart catheterization.

RESULTS

The plasma levels of alpha-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor (AMBP) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), were higher in HFpEF-PH compared to healthy controls (p < 0.01), HFrEF-PH (p < 0.05), and PAH (p < 0.001). Glyoxalase I levels were higher in HFpEF-PH and HFrEF-PH compared to controls (p < 0.001) and PAH (p < 0.001). Each of plasma AMBP, LPL, and glyoxalase I, adjusted for age and sex in multivariable logistic regression models, could differentiate HFpEF-PH from PAH, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81, 0.84 and 0.79, respectively. The combination of AMBP, LPL and glyoxalse I yielded the largest AUC of 0.87 [95% confidence interval (0.79-0.95)] in discriminating HFpEF-PH from PAH, with a sensitivity of 87.1% and a specificity of 85.4%. In HFpEF-PH, the plasma levels of AMBP correlated with pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (r = -0.42, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma AMBP, LPL and glyoxalase I may facilitate the distinction of HFpEF-PH from PAH. Larger clinical studies are encouraged to confirm and validate our findings.

摘要

背景

鉴别射血分数保留的心力衰竭伴肺动脉高压(HFpEF-PH)与肺动脉高压(PAH)对临床管理至关重要,但由于临床和合并症特征相似,可能具有挑战性。我们旨在研究肿瘤和代谢相关蛋白在鉴别 HFpEF-PH 与 PAH 中的作用。

方法

采用邻近延伸分析检测 20 例健康对照者、48 例 PAH 患者和 67 例 LHF-PH 患者[HFpEF-PH(n=31)和 HF 射血分数降低的 PH(n=36)]中的 69 种肿瘤和代谢血浆蛋白。通过右心导管检查评估血液动力学。

结果

与健康对照组(p<0.01)、HF 射血分数降低的 PH(p<0.05)和 PAH 组(p<0.001)相比,HFpEF-PH 患者的血浆α-1-微球蛋白/双 Kunin 前体(AMBP)和脂蛋白脂酶(LPL)水平升高。与对照组(p<0.001)和 PAH 组(p<0.001)相比,HFpEF-PH 和 HF 射血分数降低的 PH 患者的糖氧醛酸酶 I 水平升高。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,调整年龄和性别后,血浆 AMBP、LPL 和糖氧醛酸酶 I 每一项都可以将 HFpEF-PH 与 PAH 区分开来,其受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)分别为 0.81、0.84 和 0.79。AMBP、LPL 和糖氧醛酸酶 I 的组合在鉴别 HFpEF-PH 与 PAH 方面产生了最大的 AUC(0.87 [95%置信区间(0.79-0.95]),敏感性为 87.1%,特异性为 85.4%。在 HFpEF-PH 中,AMBP 血浆水平与肺小动脉楔压呈负相关(r=-0.42,p=0.018)。

结论

血浆 AMBP、LPL 和糖氧醛酸酶 I 可能有助于鉴别 HFpEF-PH 与 PAH。鼓励进行更大的临床研究来证实和验证我们的发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验