Suppr超能文献

EQ-5D-5L Plus呼吸附加模块在伯明翰慢性阻塞性肺疾病队列研究中的表现。

Performance of the EQ-5D-5L Plus Respiratory Bolt-On in the Birmingham Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Cohort Study.

作者信息

Hoogendoorn Martine, Jowett Susan, Dickens Andrew P, Jordan Rachel, Enocson Alexandra, Adab Peymane, Versteegh Matthijs, Mölken Maureen Rutten-van

机构信息

Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (IMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2021 Nov;24(11):1667-1675. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A respiratory bolt-on dimension for the EQ-5D-5L has recently been developed and valued by the general public. This study aimed to validate the EQ-5D-5L plus respiratory dimension (EQ-5D-5L+R) in a large group of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Validation was undertaken with data from the Birmingham COPD Cohort Study, a longitudinal UK study of COPD primary care patients. Data on the EQ-5D-5L+R were collected from 1008 responding participants during a follow-up questionnaire in 2017 and combined with (previously collected) data on patient and disease characteristics. Descriptive and correlation analyses were performed on the EQ-5D-5L+R dimensions and utilities, in relation to COPD characteristics and compared with the EQ-5D-5L without respiratory dimension. Multivariate regression models were estimated to test whether regression coefficients of clinical characteristics differed between the EQ-5D-5L+R utility and the EQ-5D-5L utility.

RESULTS

Correlation coefficients for the EQ-5D-5L+R utility with COPD parameters were slightly higher than the EQ-5D-5L utility. Both instruments displayed discriminant validity but analyses in clinical subgroups of patients showed larger absolute differences in utilities for the EQ-5D-5L+R. In the multivariate analyses, only the coefficient for the COPD Assessment Test score was higher for the model using the EQ-5D-5L+R utility as outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the addition of a respiratory domain to the EQ-5D-5L led to small improvements in the instrument's performance. Comparability of the EQ-5D across diseases, currently considered one of its strengths, would have to be traded off against a modest improvement in utility difference when adding the respiratory dimension.

摘要

目的

EQ-5D-5L最近开发了一个呼吸附加维度并得到了公众的评估。本研究旨在对一大群慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者验证EQ-5D-5L加呼吸维度(EQ-5D-5L+R)。

方法

利用伯明翰COPD队列研究的数据进行验证,这是一项对COPD初级保健患者进行的英国纵向研究。2017年在一份随访问卷中从1008名应答参与者收集了EQ-5D-5L+R的数据,并与(先前收集的)患者和疾病特征数据相结合。对EQ-5D-5L+R维度和效用进行描述性和相关性分析,涉及COPD特征,并与没有呼吸维度的EQ-5D-5L进行比较。估计多变量回归模型以测试临床特征的回归系数在EQ-5D-5L+R效用和EQ-5D-5L效用之间是否存在差异。

结果

EQ-5D-5L+R效用与COPD参数的相关系数略高于EQ-5D-5L效用。两种工具均显示出区分效度,但对患者临床亚组的分析显示,EQ-5D-5L+R在效用方面的绝对差异更大。在多变量分析中,仅以EQ-5D-5L+R效用为结果的模型中,COPD评估测试分数的系数更高。

结论

本研究表明,在EQ-5D-5L中增加一个呼吸领域可使该工具的性能略有改善。EQ-5D在不同疾病间的可比性目前被视为其优势之一,在增加呼吸维度时,必须在效用差异的适度改善与这种可比性之间进行权衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验