Rudolph Abby E, Young April M
Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston MA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia PA.
Soc Networks. 2021 Oct;67:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
Studies aiming to construct risk networks have historically collected network members' names, demographic characteristics and relational data (i.e., type, strength, duration, frequency of interaction, and HIV-related risk behaviors between the pair). Due to difficulties in constructing risk networks stemming from partner anonymity and the use of nicknames, some studies also collect network members' screen names, phone numbers, physical attributes, and scars/tattoos to assist with entity resolution. In-depth interviews with 20 men who have sex with men and transgender women in Kentucky assessed privacy/confidentiality concerns as well as accuracy/recall issues associated with providing these details. Most preferred providing alters' nicknames/first names only or a first name with the first letter of the last name. Many perceived screen names, phone numbers, and scars/tattoos to be too personal/identifying. Willingness to provide more detailed information varied by relationship type/strength, which could influence the validity of the resulting network.
以往旨在构建风险网络的研究收集了网络成员的姓名、人口统计学特征和关系数据(即两人之间关系的类型、强度、持续时间、互动频率以及与艾滋病毒相关的风险行为)。由于伴侣匿名和使用昵称导致构建风险网络存在困难,一些研究还收集网络成员的网名、电话号码、身体特征以及疤痕/纹身,以协助进行身份识别。对肯塔基州20名男同性恋者和变性女性进行的深入访谈评估了隐私/保密问题以及提供这些细节相关的准确性/回忆问题。大多数人更喜欢只提供化名/名字,或者提供名字和姓氏的首字母。许多人认为网名、电话号码以及疤痕/纹身过于个人化/具有识别性。提供更详细信息的意愿因关系类型/强度而异,这可能会影响所得网络的有效性。